Yeah in New Zealand they are only known as Kumara... It took me much longer than it should have to realise that it was the same thing as sweet potato. Kumara is a Maori word though, I wouldn't expect it to be accepted as an answer on an American quiz site
Glad to know I don't need to spend time eating blueberries anymore, even though I'd read elsewhere they were rated the best fruit to eat. Actually, I guess I can skip most fruits and just concentrate on vegetables.
These ratings are for amount of various nutrients per 100 kcal (so many fruits are lower ranked due to having high sugar content. That said, eating vegetables instead of fruits can be a good way to cut down on sugar in your diet depending on what else your eating. (Note: eating the fruit itself is still much better than drinking fruit juice when it comes to reducing sugar in your diet.)
Some other comments point out that this study is looking at a variety of nutrients, whereas bluberries are known for being high in just a few specific nutrients. I can't speak to the accuracy of that comment but it might explain why blueberries didn't make the list.
Swede for rutabaga (seconded), rocket for arugula. I am surprised not to see blueberries on the list, they are a superfood from what I know! (And I mean the wild ones, not the farmed ones.) Likewise acai berries and goji berries? It's hard to believe iceberg lettuce is so high on the list as well. And is parsley really a vegetable? Thought it was a herb and never eaten in quantities that would afford it to be named vegetable.
I think parsley is usually just used as garnish/flavoring, but some people eat in nutritionally significant quantities...
My dad is on a low carb diet, so for breakfast he chops up a large bunch of parsley and fries it with eggs. He buys parsley by the pound. But he is weird :P
I didnt know what rhutabaga was, so looked it up. And it came back to me as kohlrabi... edit: it was koolraap, but in norwegian and danish it is kålrabbi
I looked some more, apparently we have koolraap en kohlrabi... very confusing (ánd knolraap..which is turnip, which is the word often used in england scotland and northern ireland and Newfoundland for rutabanga.) all the names in that family seems a bit of a mess, and different ones are used in different countries for a variety of these products.
It is like they said, ok we ve got a few of these vegetables which are related and /or lookalike and we ve got these bunch of names... help yourself! Take a pick
I know btw that this (used to) happen a lot, plants birds and insects. They see something in one place that sounds the the description of another thing they heard of before and name it that. Sometimes in the believe it is the same thing. Sometimes because they know they dont have that thing where they life, so give the name to something that is similar consciously. (Which works fine, someehat if you add a noun. )
Like i recently learned the american robin and european robin are two completely different birds, not the same with a slight twist (that would have after separation). Not even in the same family. As similar as a pigeon and a seagull... only thing in common is the red chest. But I have only ever heard them being called robin, on both sides of the pond. So initially you assume it is the same bird.
The study measured nutritional content per 100kcal, so higher calorie foods (including most fruits and more starchy vegetables) aren't high on their list.
"apples, bananas, corn, and potatoes" are specifically described as "low nutrient density" in the study (though their source for this is behind a paywall). Note that this does NOT mean these four are unhealthy, just that you need to eat a larger/higher calories serving of (say) apples than (say) watercress to get the same amount of disease-preventing vitamins and nutrients. This is obvious to anyone who has eaten both apples and watercress, but its nice to have a study explicitly measuring the differences I guess.
They are called koolraap and knolraap in my language (and then there is koolrabi) so the name is close aswell. Different countries sometimes use the same word for different things..
I'm surprised that ice berg lettuce made the list. I always heard it was basically water and no nutritional value. And very surpised blueberries didn't make it.
Of 47 foods studied, all but 6 (raspberry, tangerine, cranberry, garlic, onion, and blueberry) satisfied the powerhouse criterion (Table 2). Nutrient density scores ranged from 10.47 to 122.68 (median score = 32.23) and were moderately correlated with powerhouse group (ρ = 0.49, P = .001). The classification scheme was robust with respect to nutrients protective against chronic disease (97% of foods classified as PFV were separately classified as such on the basis of 8 nutrients protective against cancer and heart disease).
Blueberries are probably still great for you to eat but they don't help prevent disease which was the point of the study.
Apples have higher calorie density than most things on the list. (Probably mostly from sugar... note how fruits are mostly near the bottom of the rankings). Note that depending on your dietary needs/goals that might be a good thing, but this study was looking at the most calorie-efficient ways to get a variety of other nutrients.
In my area, calling them just "sprouts" would totally confuse people. Here, sprouts refer to bean or alfalfa sprouts, used as a salad ingredient - not to Brussels sprouts.
Read the study. It explains a lot. Some items, probably including blueberries, didn't make the list because they are extremely high in only one or two of the desired nutrients. The study capped the amount of each nutrient to prevent foods making the list which didn't score high in the total range. Also, this study was aimed specifically at those foods which would prevent chronic diseases. Green leafy, yellow/orange, and those with a broad range of nutrients were the preferred ones.
The study is measuring nutrients per 100kcal, so calorie dense vegetables (such as those high in sugars like blueberries or fats like avocado) are ranked lower than lower calory things like most leafy things :P
Also I'm pretty sure the study did not test avocados at all.
While those "superfoods" might be good for weight and overall health, the study this quiz is based on was looking at what foods help prevent disease, especially food related disease like scurvy. So "keep your immune system healthiest" vs. "keep your body slimmest".
In my part of the Upper South we eat so many different ones that we have to distinguish them - collard greens, mustard greens, poke greens, dandelion greens, turnip greens, komatsuna tendergreen, etc. (My favorite is tendergreen, but they're all good.)
And fiber, iron, folate, magnesium, potassium... but this study was looking for specific nutrients in specific groups for fighting diseases, and it definitely leaned toward green leafy and yellow/orange veggies and fruits.
Also, beans are much more calorie-dense (lots of good starch and protein as you mention) so that would also rank them lower than all the leafy stuff on this quiz.
This is looking at a variety of nutrients and dividing by calorie density. Bluberries are higher in sugar and aren't high in most of the nutrients they looked at -- both factors bring it down in this study's ranking.
Note that this does not mean that blueberries are "unhealthy" (depending on what your health/diet goals are). Just that if you want to get the nutrients this study is looking at, you can do so more efficiently with the foods on this quiz.
I'm surprised no one's noticed this, but this study was very limited, and was intended to be so. It was ONLY evaluating 6 types of fruits/vegetables: green leafy, yellow/orange, citrus, cruciferous, berries, and alliums – 47 all told. That leaves out a LOT of fruits and vegetables, and the author admits it: "Foods within particular groups were studied; thus, other nutrient-dense items may have been overlooked." The criteria was also admittedly limited: "Because it was not possible to include phytochemical data in the calculation of nutrient density scores, the scores do not reflect all of the constituents that may confer health benefits." (That's a HUGE caveat!) This is a single-author study (in a CDC-published journal, but NOT "endorsed" by them), by a sociologist. Now, she's well-published & the paper's been cited, but be clear: the mainstream media glommed onto it, and blew it up WAY beyond its original scope. These aren't "the healthiest fruits & vegetables" in any general sense.
Kestrana, I wanted to make sure I added that I mean no offense toward you; I have nothing but mad respect for anyone who takes the time and effort to make awesome JetPunk quizzes, and I thank you for doing so! But I did see from some of your responses to other commenters that you too may have mistook some aspects of this study as well, for instance: 1) It wasn't a CDC study (bottom of page: "The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of […] the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention […]." 2) The absence of blueberries in this top 41 doesn't mean they don't help prevent disease (there's TONS of evidence that they do!), just that they don't test high enough for *these particular metrics* of disease prevention. I have experience with academic publishing and its frequent misuse, so I felt it was important to point these issues out.
I want to second samiamco's comments about limits of the study and thanks to Kestrana. The quiz is very interesting but the title is misleading and I would appreciate better title or clarification in the quiz description.
Jute , Ice plant , Vegetable Fern , Rhubharb , Corn-On-The-Cob , Mash , Pea , Watermelon , Grape & , Can You Accept Potato For Sweet Potato. :):).... "Whats Leaf Lettuce". Ive Never Heard Of Leaf Lettuce. Can You Have Hamburg-Parsley. [Not Parsley....] . These Are Real XD. Did You Get All Of This Information From Wikipedia (Wiki). I Was Thinking Whats Scalian (I Still Don't Know What It is). Why Do YOU Accept Rocket For Arugula. First I Was Pepetually Typing Argula... {Next Time Search Better}. Can You Accept Parzley and Argula. Can You Accept Cabagge?? Check Out All Of Quizzes. Search My User Then Click On It Then You Go To World food Quiz If You See There are foods from all over like Moussaka , Spaghetti. :). Are You The 'moderator'. Is There Anything Called Honeydew Melon Great Quiz. I Took Unlimited Because I Only A Quarter of the answers. I tThink This is One My Favourite Quizzes XD. Quizmaster Almost Knows Everything He Knows Punctuation Like {} (Braces).
This study was primarily examining "green leafy, yellow/orange, citrus, and cruciferous items " (notice that except for citrus those would all be vegetables). Also, fruits tend to be much sweeter, and this study was looking at nutrient density per 100kcal... so fruits' sugar content would put them lower in the rankings.
Ginger wasn't studied. Garlic ranked very low in the study, either because it's highly calorie dense or doesn't have high levels of the nutrients this study focused on.
Yes, this study included garlic but it didn't score highly on their metrics. I'm not sure if that's because it's relatively calorie-dense (as for apples, potatoes, etc.) or just doesn't have high levels of the nutrients they looked at. Scoring low on this study does not mean it's unhealthy.
nice idea and thanks but couldnt it easily be called 'name a vegetable/fruit' on account of the fact you have included so many of them....be much more challenging if you restricted it to about the top 10-15?
BANANAS AND ESPECIALLY DATES SHOULD BE THERE!!! I'm so surprised why Dates aren't on top. They are the best fruit in the whole world and have a cure for almost every disease. They have lots of those minerals e.g Potassium, Iron, Calcium etc. DATES SHOULD BE ON TOP!!!
The source: "Foods within particular groups were studied; thus, other nutrient-dense items may have been overlooked." Thus, the study does *not* make the claim that these are "the healthiest fruits and vegetables."
The only issue I have with this is that, apparently, the study only analyzed 47 fruits and vegetables. Therefore, a lot of fruits or veggies that can be super nutritious dont show in the list...
This list is a great counter-propaganda to my brain steering me toward sweet carbs! I do assume that leafy greens that take up minerals would also take up undesirable minerals if the land was polluted (see phytoremediation), or conversely, fewer minerals if the soil were leached.
First of it really should have a caveat that this is nutrients/calory.
secondly the study is rather shaky, they choose a limited amount of items they considered to be powerhouse food and nearly all met the 10%requirement. They picked 46 items and 41 made the cut (all of which (onion, garlic and several berries) besides tangerine were decided to be added to the list alongside the suspected powerhouse foods based on being associated with benefits of the cardiovascular system, )
Some other comments point out that this study is looking at a variety of nutrients, whereas bluberries are known for being high in just a few specific nutrients. I can't speak to the accuracy of that comment but it might explain why blueberries didn't make the list.
My dad is on a low carb diet, so for breakfast he chops up a large bunch of parsley and fries it with eggs. He buys parsley by the pound. But he is weird :P
I looked some more, apparently we have koolraap en kohlrabi... very confusing (ánd knolraap..which is turnip, which is the word often used in england scotland and northern ireland and Newfoundland for rutabanga.) all the names in that family seems a bit of a mess, and different ones are used in different countries for a variety of these products.
It is like they said, ok we ve got a few of these vegetables which are related and /or lookalike and we ve got these bunch of names... help yourself! Take a pick
Like i recently learned the american robin and european robin are two completely different birds, not the same with a slight twist (that would have after separation). Not even in the same family. As similar as a pigeon and a seagull... only thing in common is the red chest. But I have only ever heard them being called robin, on both sides of the pond. So initially you assume it is the same bird.
"apples, bananas, corn, and potatoes" are specifically described as "low nutrient density" in the study (though their source for this is behind a paywall). Note that this does NOT mean these four are unhealthy, just that you need to eat a larger/higher calories serving of (say) apples than (say) watercress to get the same amount of disease-preventing vitamins and nutrients. This is obvious to anyone who has eaten both apples and watercress, but its nice to have a study explicitly measuring the differences I guess.
Of 47 foods studied, all but 6 (raspberry, tangerine, cranberry, garlic, onion, and blueberry) satisfied the powerhouse criterion (Table 2). Nutrient density scores ranged from 10.47 to 122.68 (median score = 32.23) and were moderately correlated with powerhouse group (ρ = 0.49, P = .001). The classification scheme was robust with respect to nutrients protective against chronic disease (97% of foods classified as PFV were separately classified as such on the basis of 8 nutrients protective against cancer and heart disease).
Blueberries are probably still great for you to eat but they don't help prevent disease which was the point of the study.
Also I'm pretty sure the study did not test avocados at all.
Isn't an apple a day supposed to keep the doctor away? :P
Also, beans are much more calorie-dense (lots of good starch and protein as you mention) so that would also rank them lower than all the leafy stuff on this quiz.
Note that this does not mean that blueberries are "unhealthy" (depending on what your health/diet goals are). Just that if you want to get the nutrients this study is looking at, you can do so more efficiently with the foods on this quiz.
That said adding watercress to your diet probably won't hurt! And it's not bad as stringy, leafy foods go. :P
Bananas are ranked lower because they are very starchy & sweet, so have lower nutrient content *PER CALORIE* than the quiz answers.
secondly the study is rather shaky, they choose a limited amount of items they considered to be powerhouse food and nearly all met the 10%requirement. They picked 46 items and 41 made the cut (all of which (onion, garlic and several berries) besides tangerine were decided to be added to the list alongside the suspected powerhouse foods based on being associated with benefits of the cardiovascular system, )
Would never have guessed watercress as Number 1..