By the strictest definition it might not be, although the events of the book precede The DaVinci Code. The movie version, with which the larger audience will be familiar, is certainly a prequel as the movie version came out after the movie version of the DaVinci Code.
You two are confusing me. Prequel is what happens BEFORE. So movie version coming out after something doesn't make it a prequel. And being written earlier isn't necessary proof of something being a prequel or not. Maybe Star Wars with chapters 1,2,3 coming out after 4,5,6 confuse you of the meaning of "prequel". That said, I am not familiar with Angels and Demons, so no idea if it is setting up the scene for the Da Vinci Code or not.
I changed it to "predecessor" based on fuanacdc's complaint. In the exceptionally technical sense, a prequel is a story that is written after the original work, but tells the events that occurred before it. Fuanacdc's complaint is that the book Angels & Demons was both written before, and tells the events that occurred before The DaVinci Code. This means it is not a "true" prequel.
Yes, that is what I was getting at, thanks. Those two books were written in the order in which the events occur. It would only be considered a prequel if the book told the events that happened prior to an already established story line. Since this is a literature quiz and not a movie quiz, the order the movies were released is really a moot point.
Correct. This absolutely needs to be changed. Anne would never accept Ann. She would assume you meant a different person. Same with Katherine with a C.
While I sympathize with Anne's desire to be properly spelled, if I didn't accept "Ann" I would have a whole host of commenters complaining that the "e" was required. Can't please everyone.
Someone didn't understand Animal Farm at all, if they think it is about Napoleon the person, over whom this quiz creator is clearly thinking it was written about.
It's about communism and the Russian Revolution, and the ideology that those who are controlled and still have leaders, will never be truly equal.
From what I remember from translation studies, alliteration is repetition of the first letter, and assonance is repetition of a sound anywhere in the words. Anaphora is the repetition of a word so it's not really related here.
I felt conflicted about the clue saying it was about Napoleon because technically it WAS about Napoleon the pig even if Napoleon the pig was based on Stalin. Funny
Also, why bring up the movies as justification when this is a literature quiz?
adulteress
It's about communism and the Russian Revolution, and the ideology that those who are controlled and still have leaders, will never be truly equal.
For me, and my french-from-France learning (and teaching...) your definition applies to anaphoras.
Alliteration=Peter Piper Picked a Peck of Pickled PePPers
Isn't that right also in UK, USA (...anywhere)?