I think it is more to do with lack of Law control, corruption, and failure of the authorities to punish the 'Top Cats' of drug production and distribution, poverty and unemployment, access to firearms, illiteracy and the Macho violence against women ...... just for starters.
Probably how rich the country is, I'm guessing. Hotter countries tend not to be in Europe, which is one of the richest parts of the world. As for why this would be true for other areas (i.e. the US and Canada are richer than Latin America, one of the most prosperous South American countries is Uruguay, etc.) I'm not sure. Maybe it's to do with how many people were in the places before colonisation versus how many colonists chose to stay there, being used to colder temperatures.
It's true that there's a correlation, but temperature alone doesn't explain it. Like vindem says, many South and Southeast Asian countries are very hot and humid and have much lower murder rates. Sure, they may be underreporting, but it's likely that these countries are underreporting as well.
Personally, I learned in a Psych class that income inequality is the biggest determinant of crime. As tshalla says above, murder rate rankings and GINI rankings are pretty similar.
Well, there'd be a big spike in Israel, circa 30 AD (according to certain sources), then pretty much it would flat line (!) until modern medicine and science started working their magic
For highest murder rates outside of Africa or the Americas, try http://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/170770/highest-murder-rate-countries-with-exceptions
My experience with South and Central Americans has led me to believe that segregation and prejudice in those countries is more of an issue between the wealthy and the poor (it seems that most of them only have small middle class communities) than it is between races because most people are of mixed race. There are very few "pure" blood lines in any ethnicity. That has just been my experience. I don't claim to be any kind of authority on the subject. The poor are forced to take what they need in a system that is stacked against them and often it means resorting to violent measures.
I'm by no means an expert either, but from what I understand that's a generalization we US-Americans tend to take as gospel (at least I took it as gospel).
Compared to the long history of enforced racial segregation in the US, countries like Mexico and Brazil are much, much more mixed. But they are still quite diverse. Not everyone is mestizo or pardo, and mestizo and pardo heritage can present a broad spectrum of physical characteristics. Mexico at least has a significant indigenous population (I don't mean mestizo; I mean large communities of people speaking Zapotec, Mayan languages, etc.).
As far as I know, colorism is still a big problem in many Latin American and Caribbean countries.
The Caribbean has a surprisingly high murder rate. I knew Jamaica was really bad but I was surprised to see places like the Bahamas and St Kitts and Nevis.
These countries - the Latin American ones at least - also have some of the world's lowest suicide rates. It's an interesting contradiction, that less depressed people are more homicidal
Personally not a big fan of murder rates as a statistic for judging a country, especially if you have a country with a really small population. You could have one single murder and have the highest murder rate in the world for that year despite it being the first killing in that place for 10 years or something. These kind of figures also make some countries look incredibly dangerous but they don't take into account that a lot of the time it is gang related murders which tourists wouldn't necessarily get caught up in.
They averaged the murder rates for 10 years so the sample size is pretty decent. The bigger issue is that only reported homicides are counted, so the actual most dangerous countries are all absent from this list.
We are. Unfortunately, gang violence is very high in the ghetto areas, and outside of the ghetto areas the murders we hear about the most are relationship related.
The Lesser Antilles nations and Tuvalu are very misleading. They are considerably safe, with very low murder counts, but the sheer lack of people in those countries drastically inflates those nations' homicide rates to unbelievable numbers.
But that's exactly the point of the "rate per 100,000 inhabitants". If you have a small population, 20 or 40 murders can be a lot. You'd only really have a valid argument for Tuvalu, which lands on this list with only 2 murders, which of course could be done in a single event by a single person and therefore skew the impression of relative safety. But St Lucia, for example, has only 165,000 people; 53 homicides is a LOT for that small of a place.
One of the most interesting things I read that hadn’t even occurred to me was how much the state of trauma care in a country can skew results. For instance, you can get shot clean through the head in the US for instance and wind up making a full recovery because of the quality and availability of emergency medical care, but a schoolyard squabble in, say, Lesotho, might cause an infected puncture wound from a pencil that results in death. The caveats specifically say that the technical rate of homicides may not be an accurate indicator of a country’s general state of societal violence, although that’s usually what this data is used for.
Those seem like rather fringe examples, but I think it'd be interesting to see what kinds of weapons are used most frequently. My guess is that a lot of these are firearm deaths related to drug/human trafficking and that healthcare might matter less when you're dealing with gunshot wounds than, say, a pencil wound.
Interesting. Of all the countries on this list, Namibia surprised me three most. I thought it was a pretty safe country but I guess not. I know next door Botswana is safer though.
Namibia is very sparsely populated (only around 1M population) and manages its wildlife relatively well. This means that it has one of the largest rhino populations in Africa, which attracts international mafias that engage in poaching there. Therefore you get murders in exactly the same ways you'd expect to get around drug cartels in the Americas.
This obviously isn't the only reason, but it definitely contributes to the statistics.
The likes of Iraq/ Syria/ Somalia would dwarf the Central American countries in murder statistics - they're just too poverty ridden to have a system that records all the crimes.
They actually would not. Kind of puts it in to perspective just how bad things are in Central America when it's safer being in an anarchistic failed state or active war zone.
Once the people from these places overrun the West, you will see the same nonsense wreck our societies, unfortunately, despite all the PC open borders idiocy.
Unfortunately it seems to be true. I think people with dark-skin are overrepresented in homicide offenders in all top 5 metropolitan areas of the USA. Maybe even all of the top 20 cities by homicide rate.
And "hispanics" get lumped into the "white" category in FBI data, which seems suspicious.
No one likes violent crime, regardless of their skin color.
Uh, buddy, y’know who’s actually more likely to commit violent crimes? Poor people. Y’know what people with darker skin tend to be? Poor. Correlation does not equal causation. People with darker skin commit more crimes because of their circumstances, not their skin colour.
People with dark color skin know right from wrong, and that murder is wrong. People who are poor know right from wrong, and that murder is wrong.
Trying to wish statistics away won't change the unfortunate reality, that in 2024, murder rates in the USA would drop by about 50% if black murderers were omitted.
It transcends wealth- "Neighborhood Racial Composition and Gun Homicides"
The occlusion of that is a tragedy; how many lives will be destroyed because some people would rather feel good about themselves, than address the crisis. Ignorance does not solve problems. Informing and changing behavior does.
So basically these countries are all either majority Black or Hispanic, the former of which being the majority. And before I have some social justice warriors respond here it's important to remember the difference between hate speech and fact and for one to make sure their emotions don't hijack their sense of logic.
For someone who supposedly only listens to logic, you jumped to gleeful axe-grinding rather quickly.
If you're so convinced a majority Black population is the root cause of this horrible violence, would you care to explain why nearly all of the Black countries on this list are in the Caribbean, when there's dozens more Black countries in Africa that are completely unaccounted for?
"Americas" fits the pattern here better than a racial explanation does.
Omg, I didn't expect I would score this quiz 100%. I got all the Central American countries at first then moved on to South Africa to try some luck, got the neighbouring countries too.
Then I tried Guyana and thought of the Caribbean countries. Super surprised that those island countries have such high murder rates. Why??
For a city (generally much more densely populated than an entire country; with much higher concentration of poverty and crime), that's not even that bad. For example, the rate in Tijuana is 134, in Cape Town it's 68, and in St Louis it's 65. Chicago would not make a top 50 list of world cities by murder rate.
But it's a Republican talking point that Chicago is a warzone, and also that California is an unlivable s*hole, and so these things get repeated online a lot, confusing everyone who actually lives either place.
There's no reason to excuse Chicago's problem with crime. I'm sure the people who live there don't want violent crime in the city, regardless of their skin color or political affiliation. It's sort of similar to McKinney Texas, in median housing cost, and is @ 5,000people/sq mile vs 3,000 for McKinney.
That's true: there is always reason to strive to do better. But what kalba says is also true.
Chicago has its problems for sure, but it is overly demonized to push an agenda. A lot like how many people around where I live are convinced that Texas is stuffed to the brim with racists, an accusation which would leave most Texans dumbfounded.
Incorrect. The source shows that El Salvador has a rate of 7.8, while the United States is still ahead at 6.4, and the average European country is around only 2 or even less.
Turns out, throwing literally everyone who has a tangential relationship to crime into prison without a trial decreases crime rates, at least in the short term. In the long term, I am dubious that an authoritarian police state is a good thing, states lead by authoritarians are not particularly stable in the long run so I would not expect this to end well.
For anyone interested, here is my theory, what those Caribbean and South African countries share:
1) extreme social and economical inequality levels
2) very diverse countries ethnically and racially = inequality is exacerbated by racism and often has racial backgrounds, history of structural racism is common
3) they are generally considered as medium-developed countries not developing ones and their average income is on world average & in reality the average income is a fiction and everybody is either very poor or very rich (their poverty levels are comparable to developing countries)
All of the mentioned is a perfect recipe for disaster as it creates strong sense of social injustice and struggle to break the glass ceiling by any means.
ALSO those countries have functional state and police forces to easily report and measure crime stats BUT on the same time they do not care about actually controlling the underdeveloped areas and are limited only to developed ones.
15,000 Haitian illegal aliens have found their way to the city of Springfield Ohio, population 60k. How interesting; what an opportunity for Springfield's culture
Some of these countries are so small a few murders inflates the rate an insane amount. St. Kitts and Nevis, for example, with that 29.4 per 100,000 rate; they only have ~53,000 people which means that literally amounts to about 16 murders per year. As an American, I visited and went all around St. Kitts last year, honestly safest I've ever felt in a country, although I am ethnically very Caribbean so maybe I just fit in well.
I have a question. Palau has 11.2 per 100k, (2 murders) Immedialty, i thought its becuase they only have 18k people However, 77 people are in jail, top 10 by rates!. Why is it so high, is it because palau is so american?
Personally, I learned in a Psych class that income inequality is the biggest determinant of crime. As tshalla says above, murder rate rankings and GINI rankings are pretty similar.
http://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/229194/countries-with-the-lowest-homicide-rate
http://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/156455/cities-with-the-highest-homicide-rates.
Compared to the long history of enforced racial segregation in the US, countries like Mexico and Brazil are much, much more mixed. But they are still quite diverse. Not everyone is mestizo or pardo, and mestizo and pardo heritage can present a broad spectrum of physical characteristics. Mexico at least has a significant indigenous population (I don't mean mestizo; I mean large communities of people speaking Zapotec, Mayan languages, etc.).
As far as I know, colorism is still a big problem in many Latin American and Caribbean countries.
This obviously isn't the only reason, but it definitely contributes to the statistics.
And "hispanics" get lumped into the "white" category in FBI data, which seems suspicious.
No one likes violent crime, regardless of their skin color.
Facts are facts.
Trying to wish statistics away won't change the unfortunate reality, that in 2024, murder rates in the USA would drop by about 50% if black murderers were omitted.
It transcends wealth- "Neighborhood Racial Composition and Gun Homicides"
The occlusion of that is a tragedy; how many lives will be destroyed because some people would rather feel good about themselves, than address the crisis. Ignorance does not solve problems. Informing and changing behavior does.
Yes it is a fact that these countries are made up of certain demographics.
Your comment seems to imply that black = murderer. But perhaps a more relevant metric might be poor = murderer.
If you're so convinced a majority Black population is the root cause of this horrible violence, would you care to explain why nearly all of the Black countries on this list are in the Caribbean, when there's dozens more Black countries in Africa that are completely unaccounted for?
"Americas" fits the pattern here better than a racial explanation does.
Then I tried Guyana and thought of the Caribbean countries. Super surprised that those island countries have such high murder rates. Why??
Might want to check your sources before jumping to conclusions
But it's a Republican talking point that Chicago is a warzone, and also that California is an unlivable s*hole, and so these things get repeated online a lot, confusing everyone who actually lives either place.
McKinney has a homicide rate of @2/100k.
There's no excuse not to strive to do better.
Chicago has its problems for sure, but it is overly demonized to push an agenda. A lot like how many people around where I live are convinced that Texas is stuffed to the brim with racists, an accusation which would leave most Texans dumbfounded.
...
Btw, I'm from Mexico.
1) extreme social and economical inequality levels
2) very diverse countries ethnically and racially = inequality is exacerbated by racism and often has racial backgrounds, history of structural racism is common
3) they are generally considered as medium-developed countries not developing ones and their average income is on world average & in reality the average income is a fiction and everybody is either very poor or very rich (their poverty levels are comparable to developing countries)
All of the mentioned is a perfect recipe for disaster as it creates strong sense of social injustice and struggle to break the glass ceiling by any means.
ALSO those countries have functional state and police forces to easily report and measure crime stats BUT on the same time they do not care about actually controlling the underdeveloped areas and are limited only to developed ones.
Criminality increases? Well, that would be socioeconomic factos ig.