WW2 Tanks quiz

How could the M4 Sherman be worse than the Tiger, Panther, and T-34? The Tiger and Panther had horrible reliability and were incredibly uncomfortable to their crews. Their build quality made them way worse than the Sherman. The T-34 was made even worse. It had non-existent reliability, the armour was way too brittle, causing it to break and crack even by a shell that shouldn't've penetrated it. Its optics were almost always made out of polished steel, meaning the crew couldn't look out of it. The suspension and cost cutting measures meant the crew had zero space inside the tank. The transmission was so unreliable and poorly mounted that it was almost impossible to shift higher the 2nd gear (19kph) or into reverse. The Sherman on the other hand, had high reliability, could easily be repaired due to the large amount of easily replaceable parts, and the crew could see out of the tank, were miles more comfortable, and could escape easily if the tank was hit due to the spring loaded hatches