Could you add Aussie Rules or Australian rules as a correct answer instead of having to type in football. I think it's obvious if you're typing in Aussie/Australian rules, you know the correct answer.
Could motor racing also be accepted for motorsport?
Good Quiz! Can you accept Football for American Football. If this quiz was in spanish, it would confuse people, but its in english. It would make sense
For Ireland, football is correct but not football / soccer. Much like how the US has American Football, we have Gaelic Football, known locally as football. Very distinct from soccer.
I know, after reading the comments, that some people consider chess a sport. However, the dictionary definition should take ultimate priority: "sport (noun): an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment." Chess is not a sport. I don't care if the queen of England, the Pope, and the mummy of King Tut all agree that chess is a sport - if they do, then they are disregarding the dictionary and/or all forms of logic.
The dictionary is a record of how things are, not how they must or should be. If society moves past the dictionary it is the dictionary that is wrong.
Now, whether Chess is or is not a sport is up for debate, but it is not illogical to disagree with the current dictionary definition, nor is it illogical to include something in a category we collectively made up.
It is called football. It is a ball game played with the foot. Not like handegg in wich the egg shaped object is played with the hands and the foot is barely used.
I live in Australia. Football is Australian Rules and soccer the "world game" or just soccer. You can call it what you like but don't tell others what to call it.
I've never understood the soccer vs. football debate as an avid soccer fan myself. There is no one "right way to call the sport" because "football" can mean different things to different people. Plus, isn't soccer branded as "the global game?" So why get mad about the use of "soccer" when it is an example of the globalization of the sport?
And if you want to talk about people changing names, the English were actually the ones who came up with the term soccer as a truncation of "association football." So if the most ardent defenders of the use of "football" actually created the term "soccer," who honestly cares what you call it.
Football (soccer) fans should know the history of their sport more then, as the word soccer has been used in Britain since the 19th century, and was used as much, maybe even more so, than the word football in the period 1950s to 1970s, and it was still used well into the 80s. Read old British newspaper reports, players' biographies published in the 50s, 60s, 70s, watch old Pathe news reports or The Big Match Revisited, and the word 'soccer' is used everywhere. Quite why the perception rose that the word was somehow American or not the right word for the sport is beyond me (although the ubiquity of Americans saying 'soccer' leading up to the 94 World Cup probably had something to so with it).
What leads football is called FIFA (which is in French Fédération Internationale de Football Association aka in English: International Federation of Association Football)
In Europe it is UEFA (Union of European Football Associations)
In North America so where the US belongs it is CONCACAF (Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football)
In Asia it is AFC (Asian Football Confederation) etc.
So yes every national federations agree to call it football.
Sure, the federations may call it football, but there's really no reason to argue football vs. soccer or "correct" people who say "soccer." I mean, there are so many reasons:
1. Ironically, the term was created in England, yet Englishmen are usually the most adamant about using "football."
2. It's hypocritical to call soccer "the global game" yet complain about others using the term soccer. It's literally an example of the globalization of the sport.
3. Not every sport is aptly named. Tennis, volleyball, and badminton could be called "volleyball," but that's not the case. Badminton is named after the estate of a duke. Tennis comes from the French verb "tenir," meaning "to hold," a call the server would make to their opponent for them to get ready. Nobody cares for those two sports, and no rule states that a sport has to be named after what body parts are used.
4. The word football was already being used in other nations. Why would two sports be called football? That's confusing.
Plus, why not just use an already existing term that's not in use (soccer)? It's like opening another bottle of juice before finishing the first.
5. We get overdramatic people who feel the need to "correct" people who use the term soccer.
6. It's literally just a word.
7. There are no problems with miscommunication. Anyone who plays the sport knows what "soccer" means.
8. This is probably the most important reason. We're all fans of the same sport. Soccer, football, the global game, the beautiful game, who cares what the hell you call it. It's literally the same sport and we both enjoy it.
I'll never understand why it's become such a crime to use the word soccer. People just have to get over themselves. There are probably more reasons as well.
You stated " Englishmen are usually the most adamant about using "football." ........ what is your source for this comment?......... In the north of England we called the game 'Soccer' and we would also change that in slang form to 'Togger' as in "Coming for a game of togger?"
I probably should have said British instead of English, honestly. That's my fault. But the point is still the same. I'm speaking anecdotally, but some articles claim that the major of Britain use the word football.
"One of the best-known differences between British and American English is the fact that the sport known as football in Great Britain is usually called soccer in the United States." - Britannica
"In the 1980s, however, Brits began rejecting [soccer], as soccer became a more popular sport in the United States." - The Atlantic.
Once again, I apologize. I should have said British instead of English. And I'll also rephrase to say, "a majority of the British people are adamant about the use of football." Then that point would be stronger. Even still, your comment and most of the other points point out the stupidity of the debate. Call it whatever the hell you want.
Nice quiz! The only ones I didn't get were archery for Bhutan and motorsport for Monaco, but I feel like I should've gotten them because I've read about archery being popular in Bhutan on JetPunk before and Monaco is pretty famous for racing.
Rugby Union and Rugby League are considered football, so given a variety of other codes are awarded simply by typing football, they should also be awarded for football. In much of Australia (well, mainly Queensland and New South Wales) if you say football or colloquially "footie" people will assume you mean rugby league. In NZ people will assume you mean rugby union.
In the UK Athletics generally refers to what Americans call Track and Field, and we refer to other sports by their individual names. We wouldn't think of classing tennis or football as athletics though they are athletic activities.
Have to grudgingly admit that the American way is more logical and probably more correct linguistically.
The sport is called athletics. Some events in the sport of athletics are not a part of "track and field," like cross country running and road races (like marathons).
Americans do usually say "track" or "track and field" when talking about it for convenience; at the high school level "track" is separate from "cross country" because they take place in different seasons (winter/spring vs. fall).
Edit: Also crazy that two sports that were invented in the US (yes, I know one of them was invented by a Canadian) are not the most popular in the US, but have caught on elsewhere.
... not that crazy really... I mean the #1 most popular sport in the US was also invented there. And the #1 most popular sports in the overwhelming majority of countries were invented somewhere else. In fact every sport on this quiz was invented one of two places - the US and the UK - except for "archery" which is a prehistoric technology that originated somewhere in Africa though we're not sure where it was first considered a spectator sport, and "athletics" which I guess were invented in Greece? Then there's "Aussie rules football" which is a variant of a sport invented in the UK.
The theory that Aussie rules football comes from an Aboriginal game is as thoroughly ridiculous as it is thoroughly debunked, unless you think that the Aboriginals, by complete coincidence, were playing a game almost identical to the most popular games the inventors of Aussie rules football played as children half a world away.
From the wikipedia: "The sport's origins can be traced to football matches played in Melbourne, Victoria, in 1858, inspired by English public school football games."
Great quiz KingEureka and you respond to comments very graciously.
I'd like to point out to a few on here, and I think someone18, that yes, hockey (that's field hockey, played in its current form since 1860s) is HUGE outside the Americas. We call it hockey because it started before ice hockey so no need to distinguish between the two.
Club hockey is particularly big in Europe, including the UK, and in India, Pakistan, Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. It's played in South Korea, China and Japan, and probably other Asian countries.
Played at all levels up to Summer Olympics, by all ages and is one of very few sports that can be played in mixed sex teams.
Sadly the switch from grass to Astroturf pitches has meant that many less wealthy clubs have folded but it is still a very big sport.
And football, American football and Rugby are totally different games.
"Athletics" encompasses all of running, walking, jumping, or throwing. Olympic and World Championship athletic events include sprinting, hurdles, steeplechase, marathon, walk racing, pole vault, high jump, long jump, triple jump, shot put, discus, hammer throw, javelin, pentathlon, heptathlon, and decathlon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_of_athletics
Great quiz!
Foot for football?
Pickle for pickleball?
Could motor racing also be accepted for motorsport?
Now, whether Chess is or is not a sport is up for debate, but it is not illogical to disagree with the current dictionary definition, nor is it illogical to include something in a category we collectively made up.
Soccer is much more popular then I realized.
Over 90% of the worlds population call it football.
https://i.redd.it/fdvgg3g7ngs51.jpg
Fun Fact: The Australian SOCCER Association changed its name to FOOTBALL Federation Australia in 2005.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_Australia
And if you want to talk about people changing names, the English were actually the ones who came up with the term soccer as a truncation of "association football." So if the most ardent defenders of the use of "football" actually created the term "soccer," who honestly cares what you call it.
What leads football is called FIFA (which is in French Fédération Internationale de Football Association aka in English: International Federation of Association Football)
In Europe it is UEFA (Union of European Football Associations)
In North America so where the US belongs it is CONCACAF (Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football)
In Asia it is AFC (Asian Football Confederation) etc.
So yes every national federations agree to call it football.
End of the debate I guess...
1. Ironically, the term was created in England, yet Englishmen are usually the most adamant about using "football."
2. It's hypocritical to call soccer "the global game" yet complain about others using the term soccer. It's literally an example of the globalization of the sport.
3. Not every sport is aptly named. Tennis, volleyball, and badminton could be called "volleyball," but that's not the case. Badminton is named after the estate of a duke. Tennis comes from the French verb "tenir," meaning "to hold," a call the server would make to their opponent for them to get ready. Nobody cares for those two sports, and no rule states that a sport has to be named after what body parts are used.
4. The word football was already being used in other nations. Why would two sports be called football? That's confusing.
5. We get overdramatic people who feel the need to "correct" people who use the term soccer.
6. It's literally just a word.
7. There are no problems with miscommunication. Anyone who plays the sport knows what "soccer" means.
8. This is probably the most important reason. We're all fans of the same sport. Soccer, football, the global game, the beautiful game, who cares what the hell you call it. It's literally the same sport and we both enjoy it.
I'll never understand why it's become such a crime to use the word soccer. People just have to get over themselves. There are probably more reasons as well.
"One of the best-known differences between British and American English is the fact that the sport known as football in Great Britain is usually called soccer in the United States." - Britannica
"In the 1980s, however, Brits began rejecting [soccer], as soccer became a more popular sport in the United States." - The Atlantic.
Once again, I apologize. I should have said British instead of English. And I'll also rephrase to say, "a majority of the British people are adamant about the use of football." Then that point would be stronger. Even still, your comment and most of the other points point out the stupidity of the debate. Call it whatever the hell you want.
Have to grudgingly admit that the American way is more logical and probably more correct linguistically.
Edit: Also crazy that two sports that were invented in the US (yes, I know one of them was invented by a Canadian) are not the most popular in the US, but have caught on elsewhere.
From the wikipedia: "The sport's origins can be traced to football matches played in Melbourne, Victoria, in 1858, inspired by English public school football games."
I'd like to point out to a few on here, and I think someone18, that yes, hockey (that's field hockey, played in its current form since 1860s) is HUGE outside the Americas. We call it hockey because it started before ice hockey so no need to distinguish between the two.
Club hockey is particularly big in Europe, including the UK, and in India, Pakistan, Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. It's played in South Korea, China and Japan, and probably other Asian countries.
Played at all levels up to Summer Olympics, by all ages and is one of very few sports that can be played in mixed sex teams.
Sadly the switch from grass to Astroturf pitches has meant that many less wealthy clubs have folded but it is still a very big sport.
And football, American football and Rugby are totally different games.
Also thanks for now accepting just Hockey for ice hockey because I don't think many of us Canadians would have gotten it otherwise
Great quiz!
but ok that works