The only reason I got Irrawaddy is because I read about the Irrawaddy Dolphin, an endangered species, lived in that river. At the last minute of the quiz I was taking wild guesses.
2,830 cubic meters per second. I've always heard that the Amazon had the largest discharge but the magnitude is astounding. I had no idea it was that much bigger than the Nile
I'm not sure I understand your question. Including tributaries wouldn't make sense as they don't discharge any water into the sea, only into another river.
I'm with marathon - the discharge from the tributaries will ultimately end up at the river mouth and be included ... and since it says "discharging into the sea", i.e. not a main river, there's no need to even mention tributaries?
Added some more spellings, but typing any of the following would have worked "River Plate", "Plate", "Rio de la Plata", "Rio Plata", or "Plata". Combining English and Spanish didn't work though.
@gamorro I suspect it's not intended to be anything approaching a translation. Rather, the spelling captures how someone might misspell it -- a non-native Spanish speaker might think it's a schwa at the end and try an 'e' instead of an 'ah' sound.
Shout out to South America - three of the top six, and appears to put out about as much water as the rest of the world combined (I'm not bothering to figure it out).
Some spare time here : probably too close to call, but South America does not make it by a small swimming pool (280600 meters cube per second vs 280793 for the rest of the world). However the Amazon alone discharges more than the last 15 rivers combined !
Very nice! I think Meghna should be accepted for Ganges/Brahmaputra. There is a quite confusing name situation in the delta there, but even wikipedia names these three.
Same for some other rivers, like the Yellow River, which I would've been willing to bet money were safely on here.
I'm not a geographer, though.