I love the idea of this, but some of the selected answers don't really fit what you're going for.
For example- Mongolia refers to more or less the same region with both clues; Western Sahara is definitively just referring to part of the desert that's already mentioned; and Macedonia is just asking for controversy, since you're talking about two different parts of the same politically-charged region.
On the other hand, Pearl, Bad, Cedar, and Sierra are great since they refer to drastically distinct geographic entities.
You're completely missing the point, which is that one is a NAME of a thing and one is a description of a PICTURE of a thing. But I'll humor you anyway.
Geography is not ONLY about places. However, calling a flag a geographical feature loosens the definition to the point where pretty much EVERYTHING is a geographical feature. Why not add Hannah Montana and Dakota Fanning to your quiz as well? They're certainly a part of "the lands, the features, the inhabitants, and the phenomena of Earth" as much as a flag is.
This quiz was fun! With all respect to GrandMo and tchutzer, I think they're missing the point - we're just being asked here to have fun with words that appear in two different geographical contexts.
From my own visit to Macedonia, the country, and Macedonia, the Greek region, neither place feels "politically charged" - the only beef is just around the name: the Greeks are irritated that Macedonia, the country, is naming itself with a name that many Greeks feel belong to them.
And the use of Sahara in Western Sahara and Sahara Desert are not two different contexts. They're both referring to the exact same thing. Here's a new clue to add: North ______: Location of Fargo; South _____: Home of Mount Rushmore.
GrandMo and tschutzer ~ Western Sahara is a disputed geopolitical name, with meaning far beyond just "Here lies the western part of the Sahara Desert".
We understand that it is a name distinct from "a region of the desert;" what we're saying is that the word SAHARA is used in the same context in both clues.
As opposed to Pearl or York, which refer to two entirely different areas of the world, SAHARA and MONGOLIA e.g. are just the two different references to the same term.
Refer to the North/South "Dakota" example above. It demonstrates the problem with using this kind of reference.
Does "York" refer to entirely different things though?
Like, I'm pretty sure every York not in northern England refers either to that place, or to the Duke of that place. Don't know of any Yorks that came into that name independently. Whole quiz could literally be English places and then bits of former colonies they named after those places and the people who ruled them. Or French ones. Or Spanish ones. Is that honestly better? I don't think so.
I agree that those aren't the strongest entries in this quiz, but they work okay and it adds some variety.
As well as Cape York in Queensland (the most northerly point of Australia) there is in South Australia a York Peninsular, looks just like Italy, and Yorktown, there is a county of York also. There is a York in Western Australia with a great Car Museum. There is York Town in Tasmania etc.
Very Nice Quiz! You cloud likely make a quiz but just with U.S places. New Orleans, Boston, New Hampshire, Venice Beach, San Jose, Georgia, New Jersey, New Mexico, etc
Yes, it is SE Asia so is India I consider it more based on the ethnic groups. Afghanistan is the end of central Asia. Pakistanis are Clearly south east asians.
I've made this quiz in French, with other names. It is called Homonymie - Géographie. And yes I made it before this quiz but had only 150 Times played and not featured 😟
I agree, awolf. Having lived there during the 1990s, I can say it is totally appropriate for "Rapids" to be in quotation marks. The rapids in Cedar Rapids aren't very big unless you count the 5-in-1 Dam.
For example- Mongolia refers to more or less the same region with both clues; Western Sahara is definitively just referring to part of the desert that's already mentioned; and Macedonia is just asking for controversy, since you're talking about two different parts of the same politically-charged region.
On the other hand, Pearl, Bad, Cedar, and Sierra are great since they refer to drastically distinct geographic entities.
Geography is not ONLY about places. However, calling a flag a geographical feature loosens the definition to the point where pretty much EVERYTHING is a geographical feature. Why not add Hannah Montana and Dakota Fanning to your quiz as well? They're certainly a part of "the lands, the features, the inhabitants, and the phenomena of Earth" as much as a flag is.
From my own visit to Macedonia, the country, and Macedonia, the Greek region, neither place feels "politically charged" - the only beef is just around the name: the Greeks are irritated that Macedonia, the country, is naming itself with a name that many Greeks feel belong to them.
As opposed to Pearl or York, which refer to two entirely different areas of the world, SAHARA and MONGOLIA e.g. are just the two different references to the same term.
Refer to the North/South "Dakota" example above. It demonstrates the problem with using this kind of reference.
Like, I'm pretty sure every York not in northern England refers either to that place, or to the Duke of that place. Don't know of any Yorks that came into that name independently. Whole quiz could literally be English places and then bits of former colonies they named after those places and the people who ruled them. Or French ones. Or Spanish ones. Is that honestly better? I don't think so.
I agree that those aren't the strongest entries in this quiz, but they work okay and it adds some variety.
I had to laugh about the "wich"-key.
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/25526/cities-found-in-more-than-one-country
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/25526/cities-more-than-one-country-latin
Centre works but center works too (suggestion)