Good quiz. Much harder thinking of the novels as opposed to the authors. Only got 25 right - another 20 I should have got and loads I've never heard of.
I quite don't understand this: Nabokov is Russian, but all the other authors are native English speakers - so is this list only about authors writing in English or don't they regard any other author worthy to appear on the list?
Joseph Conrad (one of my favorite authors) was Polish and although he wrote beautifully in English it was not his first language. Four of his books are listed here - for good reason!
It's a list of novels that were originally written in English, as opposed to books written in other languages and then later translated to English (like, say, One Hundred Years of Solitude, which was originally written in Spanish.) Nabokov may have been Russian, but he wrote Lolita and Pale Fire in English.
True, but this list is horribly biased against modern works. The vast majority are 50+ years old. Is it any wonder a lot of people come out of school thinking that they don't like reading when we tell them these are the best books?
I'd say that the Harry Potter series, all jokes aside is one of the most important book series in the world, especially in regards to modern literature. It's not exactly some literary masterpiece, but it gets people in that younger age group to start reading and actually enjoy the immersion a book can grant create.
In that same vein, one could easily make a case for The Lord of the Rings or The Hobbit being on here (The Hobbit especially), as well as The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe. Those books in addition to Harry Potter have had a much more profound impact on the majority of these books.
I find it very limited in the choice of authors. For example: James Joyce, Joseph Conrad, Henry James, V.S. Naipaul -- 4 authors = 12 of the novels. One less of each and they could've included a wider spread. And probably even better books too.
Powell's *A Question of Upbringing*? A good novel, but not the best in the series (I'd say *At Lady Molly's*); more objectively, the other multi-volume novels are in the list as such: *the Alexandria Quartet*, *the USA trilogy*, so why not *A Dance to the Music of Time*? Wasted lots of time on my smartphone retyping.
Er, Lord of the Rings? Fahrenheit-451? To Kill a Mockingbird? This list is quite unrepresentative of some of the best books ever, let alone of the twentieth century.
The Lord of the Rings is not only one of the most iconic series of books ever but also one of the best. It's far greater than half the books on this least easily.
As far as I can tell there are five women on this list and one person of color. Ridiculous to have more Joseph Conrad books than books by non-white men.
You need 69 for 5 points and I only got 66, and I'm so disappointed in myself for missing half a dozen that I definitely should have gotten - especially Maugham, Roth, James Dickey, and all of the Henry James books.
And now I only got 63. I'm regressing. I did get Dickey, Maugham, and The Wings of the Dove, but I forgot about The Golden Bowl and 5 other books I got last time.
I was an English major, but the canon has changed over the last few decades, and I didn't read much 20th century lit. And I was more into poetry. Nevertheless, I think some of my profs would be ashamed. I'm not EVEN going to admit what I missed, other than 73/100.
And thought *Wings of A dove* for the James :-(
I was an English major, but the canon has changed over the last few decades, and I didn't read much 20th century lit. And I was more into poetry. Nevertheless, I think some of my profs would be ashamed. I'm not EVEN going to admit what I missed, other than 73/100.