thumbnail

States that Have Been Red the Longest

Which U.S. states have supported a Republican Party candidate in every election since 1968?
Quiz by interopia
Rate:
Last updated: November 6, 2024
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
First submittedNovember 6, 2024
Times taken17,912
Average score77.8%
Rating4.40
2:00
Enter state here
0
 / 9 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Since
Last Democrat
State
1968
Johnson
Alaska
1968
Johnson
Idaho
1968
Johnson
Kansas
1968
Johnson
Nebraska
1968
Johnson
North Dakota
Since
Last Democrat
State
1968
Johnson
Oklahoma
1968
Johnson
South Dakota
1968
Johnson
Utah
1968
Johnson
Wyoming
34 Comments
+7
Level 94
Nov 6, 2024
Montana would be on the list if it weren't for the fact that Ross Perot garnered 26% of the vote in the 1992 election, resulting in a 2.5% margin for Clinton over Bush.
+12
Level 76
Nov 6, 2024
Montana is a lot more blue than it'd seem—Obama only lost it 10,000 votes in 2008. They also have a Democratic senator, Jon Tester, but he just lost his seat yesterday.
+16
Level ∞
Nov 6, 2024
Maybe we shouldn't draw too many conclusions from last night, but Trump won Montana by 20 points.

That makes Montana more red than California (+17 Harris) and New York (+13 Harris) are blue.

+10
Level 80
Nov 7, 2024
Montana also has a lower population than the island of Manhattan, so each vote is weightier as a percentage point than in massive states like CA or NY. Meaning larger margins of victory are more likely with fewer total votes cast (i.e. Obama may have only lost by 11K votes in 2008 but in MT that's almost 3% of the vote, in a state like CA that's less than 0.1%).
+1
Level 57
Nov 7, 2024
Although that sounds persuasive I'm not sure that it's how it works, at least once the population is higher than 100 or so. Perhaps some statistician can correct me, but I can't see any reason why there should be any correlation between smaller populations and more overwhelming votes. Icelandic general elections, for example, aren't particularly marked by wider margins than Dutch ones, even though the Hague alone has 50% more people than Iceland does.
+4
Level 21
Nov 8, 2024
Think about it this way:

Montana has 4 electoral votes. 574,000 votes were cast in Montana in the 2024 presidential election. Divide 574,000 by 4. This means that each electoral vote in Montana represented 143,500 votes (ignore the winner-take-all system).

Texas has 40 electoral votes. Approximately 11,320,000 votes were cast in Texas in the 2024 presidential election. Divide 11,320,000 by 40. This means that each electoral vote in Texas represented about 283,000 votes.

The more votes each electoral vote, congressional representatives, or district represents, the less influence and power each individual vote has. So in this example, a vote in Montana almost twice as powerful as one in Texas.

There’s more factors that determine a vote’s worth, but that’s the basic idea. Some say that this helps small states have equal representation, but really, it means they’re overrepresented. This is one reason the Electoral College is so undemocratic.

Hope that helps 🙂

+13
Level 67
Nov 6, 2024
correction: wyoming does not exist
+2
Level 71
Nov 6, 2024
So, basically the states that have been red the longest just trace back to the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act, while states that have been blue the longest are not necessarily linked to any major explanation?

I'm not from US so the conjunctures of red swaps at Nixon and Reagan are not clear to me.

+4
Level 86
Nov 6, 2024
Minnesota stands alone at the top of the "blue the longest" quiz because, in 1984, 49 states voted for Reagan. Minnesota was the only state in the entire union to vote for Mondale. That is why even super blue California doesn't share the record.
+8
Level 80
Nov 7, 2024
I think it's worth pointing out both candidates in 1984 carried their home states (MN just happened to be the ONLY one Mondale won, plus DC), and that between 1952 and 1988 the only time California was NOT red was in 1964 for LBJ.
+9
Level ∞
Nov 7, 2024
Yeah, people don't know that California was a Republican stronghold for decades.
+1
Level 60
Nov 7, 2024
i just put this on the longest blues lol
+2
Level 85
Nov 7, 2024
Minnesota was Walter Mondale's home state. Likely the main reason he won it.
+6
Level 83
Nov 7, 2024
Ironically, the states that hated the Civil Rights Act the most can't even get on this list because they specifically voted for a one-off super-segregationist third party in 1968.
+1
Level 86
Nov 7, 2024
But they wouldn't be on the list anyway. They voted blue before that.
+1
Level 46
Nov 9, 2024
Southern states also voted for Carter in 1976 (mainly because he's from Georgia) and partially for Clinton in 1992 and 1996 (because he's from Arkansas).
+7
Level 62
Nov 7, 2024
There should probably be something here about Nebraska's split delegates, seeing as one went for Harris just this year.
+2
Level 55
Nov 7, 2024
Why all these sweats, just make a system that every single democratic country have
+3
Level 78
Nov 7, 2024
Because we're merican. F* yeah (gun blows up in my hand)
+1
Level 55
Nov 7, 2024
I heard in some states y'all don't even need an ID to vote. It means you can vote multiple times. (Plot twist: this country is called "democratic").
+4
Level 36
Nov 7, 2024
it is democratic
+8
Level 80
Nov 8, 2024
For real? More than half of the country requests or requires photo ID to vote at polls and in the states that don't it's not like they don't care. It does not mean you can vote multiple times unless you want a massive fine or jail time. People barely turn out in decent numbers to vote once, you think they care about trying to do it twice? Spend five minutes on Google next time dude
+3
Level 61
Nov 8, 2024
arguing with levisek is impossible yall dont try
+1
Level 55
Nov 8, 2024
I only said it's possible to do that twice, but I never said they do that
+2
Level 21
Nov 8, 2024
but it’s not. besides, the original statement was a criticism of America’s election system (which is NOTORIOUSLY lacking in the democracy department compared to much of the rest of the democratic world), not some problem with Voter ID laws. Voter ID laws don’t even actually negatively affect that many people.
+1
Level 55
Nov 8, 2024
Oh, okay. I thought it was. Even saw ppl that were saying they did it. But now I don't think they were saying truth.
+4
Level 70
Nov 8, 2024
One person, one vote. As long as the individual is a citizen with the right to participate, the latitude and longitude of where one votes for president shouldn't amplify or diminish its weight.
+1
Level 61
Nov 8, 2024
yes
+1
Level 21
Nov 8, 2024
that’s the idea anyway
+1
Level 45
Nov 9, 2024
Two-Party system, red or blue, it's just the other side of the coin. Rather boring.
+2
Level 55
Nov 9, 2024
The title should be clearer on which election we're talking about. Looks like you're talking about the Presidential election, but it could have been Senatorial or Gubernotarial.
+1
Level 55
Nov 11, 2024
No Oklahoma county voted blue since the 2008 elections.
+1
Level 29
Nov 13, 2024
This is why the us election is rigged
+2
Level 21
Nov 13, 2024
it's not rigged, dude. it's just deeply flawed because we're still arbitrarily abiding to institutions established by people hundreds of years ago as though they're some kind of godlike wisdom despite decades of evidence to the contrary

go USA