Lol no it isn't. But since you're someone who still calls it "global warming" instead of "climate change" that says all I need to know about you. Both are obviously awful but no way you actually think plastic pollution is worse for humans
So says someone. "Improper disposal" is open to interpretation. And then there's the matter of how one comes up with such figures. When I put a plastic container in the garbage rather than the recycling, how is this found out? And what if "proper disposal" is much more common in some countries, but per capita those countries also use ten - a hundred - or a thousand times more plastic? All that matters is its disposal?
Yeah Panama & Guatemala aren't using that much plastic. But the ships arriving at their shores have plenty of it. If you feel warm and fuzzy about wasting money on "recycling", you've been taken in by a b.s. regulation.
Of course, here in the U.S. we "recycle" our plastic which meant, until recently, shipping it to China so that they could improperly dispose of it for us. I wonder how much plastic has ended up in the oceans due to well-meaning but misguided recycling programs? Probably a lot. Fortunately, China has stopped taking our plastic so now we can throw it into a landfill where it belongs.
But, if we do actually want to recycle (and we should) here's how we should do it...
Only make one type of consumer plastic recyclable. Make it a law to clearly distinguish this recyclable plastic from other, non-recyclable, plastics. Perhaps by coloring it green. This would make it easy to sort and would result in a uniform, valuable product. Currently, so much junk ends up in the recycling bin that most of it ends up in the trash. Plastic recycling as it is currently performed is a net negative for the environment. It badly needs to be reformed or ended.
Here they say that plastic can be sorted quite efficiently by a machine that uses optics to figure out what type of plastic it is. What cannot be used is plastic packaging that combines different types of plastics that cannot be easily separated from each other.
I simply don't believe that bulk recycling can be sorted efficiently by a machine. Especially considering all the crap that people throw into the recycling. Here in Seattle, fast food restaurants are required to have three containers: trash, recycling, and compost. When you look inside the containers you will see that their contents are virtually the same. And Seattle has a higher percentage of college graduates than practically any large city in the entire world. It's just a lost cause.
It's only a lost cause because the companies that actually produce the plastic (coca-cola being a prime example) have successfully marketed a narrative that it's the end-consumer's responsibility to dispose of all the crap they pump out. "We're not responsible for what people do with their trash, we just give people the products they want. If they don't 'recycle it properly' (as if that's a practical solution in any meaningful sense) then they're to blame." We've all internalised that narrative, and they've successfully lobbied governments to stop them being held financially and morally accountable.
I've heard that in order to achieve "properly sorted plastic", you would need to remove all labels, remove those little rings left over when you take the cap off, and divide it all into separate bins by number and color. So would every single other person (because all it takes is one badly sorted contributor to ruin a whole batch). And recycling haulers would need to have dozens of different compartments per truck and spend about 5x as long collecting recycling.
never heard about the labels, and here we are actually encouraged to turn bottles in "with" their cap on. And since about a year the cap caps actually stay attached. (On milk cartons though and we don't get money for turning those in)
Here in Seattle, there are 3 different trucks that visit our residence to collect waste. One for trash, recycling, and compost. I am virtually certain that the extra emissions from have three trucks instead of one far outweighs any conceivable benefit of recycling and compost.
So these are all the countries that the West sends their plastic to for "recycling". It would be interesting which countries' consumers are actually responsible for the most plastic, as opposed to which countries it is disposed in.
I watched a documentary saying that a lot of plastic is sent from the UK to Malaysia to be "processed" (which in practice meant dumping it in a scrapyard and waiting until it caught fire and released noxious fumes into the nearby residential areas, and then doing nothing). But that was just from one particular local authority in the UK and I don't know if any other local authorities sent their plastic to Malaysia. Also it has probably stopped now because of the documentary (it probably would have had some effect as it seemed that the local authority didn't know what was happening to the plastic).
I have a friend who inherited a regional waste company (mostly a giant fleet of garbage trucks). He has his drivers collect separate trash and umpteen types of recycling because it's what customers in general want. It winds up obviously taking more room per trip instead of compacting it in one giant smelly mess. So the costs are passed back to the curbside cans of course. Unfortunately, a great percentage of it all winds up in regional incinerators after being sorted even though there are rail yards, freeways and a deep water international port right there to send it back into recirculation. I'm not joining a conversation with a solution, be it informed or nearsighted, just a head shake.
In some cases the best solution to the problem of how to dispose of plastic is to burn it in a controlled manner. Most of the stuff it is made of is burned anyway. Politicians who want to appear to care about the environment dislike this solution, however, and would rather send it to a third-world country if recycling is not an option in their area. In these countries they are assured that the plastic will be processed cheaply and in a "green" manner, but it actually ends up burning anyway, just in a way that poisons people and in which the energy released by burning can't be used. Meanwhile one wonders what happens to the money paid for the recycling if the recycling never happens. I presume it is kept by some corrupt official.
A lot of this will be sent over by the EU for processing and not handled properly. But plastic straws are a very small percentage of the problem, you are correct.
I would ban plastic water bottles. Not only are you paying an exorbitant price for 1/2 liter of water, but those plastic bottles end up on the street or garbage. Most of the litter I see are paper and plastic water bottles.
I live in Germany and here you pay a deposit for the water bottles. 25 cent / bottle, no matter how big or small. This way people return most of the bottles to the shops. There you put them in a machine which gives you a receipt with the amount. You can use it to buy something else from the store or just to get the cash back. Even if some bottles do end up in the trash can, there are a lot of people who collect them, so they're not necessarily "lost" from the cycle.
I think more countries should have a bottle and can deposit system where you pay extra money when you buy those packagings and get that money back when you bring them back so they can be recycled or properly disposed. In Germany that's totally normal for most beverages and it's been like that for many many years. From what I know not a lot of countries have such a system.
I read somewhere that the most common, most harmful plastic trash as well as the most common plastic in the oceans is cigarette butts (filters). Pretty lethal, considering the other toxins included.
Do we already have a quiz about the dumped electronics?
Something odd going on in Sri Lanka. 0.25% of the world, 5% of plastic pollution. Either they import everyone else's plastic or they use it in everything.
The data used for the study that is the source for this claim is erroneous. According to the data it claims that Sri Lanka's Per Person Daily waste generation is 5.1kg, which is plainly impossible when even developed countries with a throwaway culture rarely break over 2.5kg PPD.
According to Sri Lanka's Ministry of Environment, the daily generation of solid waste per person in the country is around 0.5kg. The 5.1kg PPD value is an anomaly that should have been pegged before publication, but the data has yet to be retracted.
Sri lanka has been busy! And interestingly no russia, I guess they repurpose stuff more? And use it longer.
(I ve seen them "macgyver" a lot of things where other people or countries would have seen something as broken they say ahh we can fix it, and ducttape some thing on ;) Like, no steeringwheel? Does not matter, we can use this dinnerplate.. :) that is a joke btw )
Bangladesh is the filthiest country I've ever been to. I've never seen a population in which littering & polluting is so accepted. The government & activists are trying to change this attitude but it's an uphill battle.
I remember when I was a kid growing up in the United States people used to just throw trash everywhere. Then there was.. that crying Indian, and Smokey Bear, and the Don't Be a LitterBug campaign, and Captain Planet, and Earth Day, and recycling bins showing up everywhere, and Woodsy Owl guilt tripping all of us... and eventually attitudes and behaviors changed. Nowadays I think if someone throws their garbage on the street or out their car window most people are going to look at them like they're a total jerk, and so Americans just don't do that anymore. Not often. And when I'm overseas some places I become very aware of just how hard it is to find a public trash can, depending on where you are. Varies from place to place. Campaigns like this can have an effect.
This TedX talk is interesting. Littering is something which is accepted in South Asia but which is not in most other countries. People are trying to change this, but change can be slow.
I can confirm this. There are huge piles of trash everywhere, especially the poorer rural areas. Kinda disgusting to see how much it clogs up waterways and such. Even my educated, urbanite cousins just threw plastic wherever they wanted. It's disappointing because Bangladesh is otherwise a pretty beautiful country.
Ironically, Bangladesh was one of the first countries to ban plastic bags in some form, back in 2002. The ban just isn't enforced very well at all. I just hope economic development and government action can fix this problem in the future (although maybe not, since Thailand is richer and still clearly has a huge plastic problem).
I would have expected China and India to be at an similar level, actually I thought India would have been even higher than China.
Now what are the main reasons for this?
Missing technology? Probably for some of the countries but not for the main culprits.
Low education of the people? It is difficult to prevent pollution if people don't understand the reasons...
Poverty may also be a big factor. It's much easier to think about waste separation when you know what to eat the next day.
But I think, the main factor is greed, saving money by NOT paying for waste management or shipping it to cheap providers in other countries, who don't handle this properly and rather just dump it into the next river.
It's mainly because this metric is flawed, there is absolutely no way that the US only accounts for 0.86% of plastic while Sri Lanka accounts for 5%. It's straight up impossible.
It's interesting looking at the data for 2019 from this source. You can see which countries have put in a greater effort to address their pollution, notably China's drop from #1 to #4 (behind the Philippines India & Malaysia)
Great quiz! Although a lot of the plastic is obviously not originally from these countries, them simply throwing it into the world's oceans needs to be adressed way more than it currently is.
Western countries not making it to the list because they "recycle" their plastics lol. Philippines making it to top 1 because they are S.Korea, Canada's etc. trash can.
if you had read any of the 70+ comments you would have had to scroll past to post this one, you would have probably seen at least one of the many discussions talking about how the USA sends a lot of their plastic to other countries to "recycle" for them
I worked in plastic factories. If they could recycle the plastic they would as it saves money. Fact is - it is very hard to recycle. The plastic has to be ground back down to small particles to use again. Any mix of colours is problematic. The many, many types of plastic cannot usually be combined to make a usable new plastic product.
I feel that the only way we can save the Earth from being chocked by pollution is to make sure students study Malthus theory of population and recognize that humans need to stop reproducing so many of us!!
how much of the Philippines waste actually originates from elsewhere? I'd guess a huge amount of it is from Europe or North America which has been sent there to be 'recyled' and has ended up in the sea. How can a country of 120 million produce 5x the amount as China, which has about 12x the population? That's saying that every Filipino produces 60x the plastic waste as the average Chinese? Numbers don't really add up.
Also explains why the US and European countries don't register on this list at all.
How can small countries like Guatemala or Haiti have more plastic pollution than large countries like Mexico or Colombia. Something doesn't make sense.
Only make one type of consumer plastic recyclable. Make it a law to clearly distinguish this recyclable plastic from other, non-recyclable, plastics. Perhaps by coloring it green. This would make it easy to sort and would result in a uniform, valuable product. Currently, so much junk ends up in the recycling bin that most of it ends up in the trash. Plastic recycling as it is currently performed is a net negative for the environment. It badly needs to be reformed or ended.
Do we already have a quiz about the dumped electronics?
According to Sri Lanka's Ministry of Environment, the daily generation of solid waste per person in the country is around 0.5kg. The 5.1kg PPD value is an anomaly that should have been pegged before publication, but the data has yet to be retracted.
(I ve seen them "macgyver" a lot of things where other people or countries would have seen something as broken they say ahh we can fix it, and ducttape some thing on ;) Like, no steeringwheel? Does not matter, we can use this dinnerplate.. :) that is a joke btw )
Ironically, Bangladesh was one of the first countries to ban plastic bags in some form, back in 2002. The ban just isn't enforced very well at all. I just hope economic development and government action can fix this problem in the future (although maybe not, since Thailand is richer and still clearly has a huge plastic problem).
They even haven't money to buy a plastic bag!
Now what are the main reasons for this?
Missing technology? Probably for some of the countries but not for the main culprits.
Low education of the people? It is difficult to prevent pollution if people don't understand the reasons...
Poverty may also be a big factor. It's much easier to think about waste separation when you know what to eat the next day.
But I think, the main factor is greed, saving money by NOT paying for waste management or shipping it to cheap providers in other countries, who don't handle this properly and rather just dump it into the next river.
Missed malaysia
Understandable honestly, I live by the coast and its VERYy polluted so I'm not that surprised that it's on the list
I feel that the only way we can save the Earth from being chocked by pollution is to make sure students study Malthus theory of population and recognize that humans need to stop reproducing so many of us!!
Also explains why the US and European countries don't register on this list at all.