Only three Pac-12 teams selected this year, and not even the best three. On the other hand, seven from the SEC, including Alabama.........Alabama? I refuse to watch another NCAA tournament game until the selection committee at least tries to look like they're fair and impartial.
Alabama had a really difficult schedule and did pretty decent. I think they deserve to be in the tournament. As for teams that were snubbed, some of them should've made it. And all of those PAC-12 teams lost, which doesn't help the case your making.
So what deserving team was left out? Maybe the conference should just accept its mediocrity this year since they are completely out of the tournament before the SWAC, Patriot, Big West and several other basketball wise insignificant ones.
The SEC rarely has a lot of teams in the NCAA tournament. Usually it's Kansas, Florida, and then one or two other teams that happen to be good. The Pac-12 is always well-represented. Have you considered that the SEC is just having a good year, and the Pac-12 is having a bad year? Why would the committee be biased toward the SEC? It's not a traditional basketball power.
Really? It was basically one person, and they fired him. Arizona, Auburn, Louisville, Miami, South Carolina, Alabama, and USC were the other schools concurrently convicted. Most of them got in the tourney.
You guys screw me up with your inconsistencies. On these college quizzes, I've started typing "st" then arrowing back and typing the state name. Gives you 2 answers in 1. Like Arizona and Arizona St. That didn't work for North Carolina and Kansas in this quiz.