Wikipedia has created a ranking of the most-viewed pages between December 1, 2007 and January 1, 2020. Can you guess the 30 cities the Wikipedia community has searched the most?
excluding the Luxembourgish town of Angelsberg, which somehow managed to get 44 million views
Whatever happened to the Orient so it's "offensive"? It means east, which the Orient is east of everything except the 12 people in an ocean that spans half the globe.
@IsleAuHaulte offensiveness isn't based on strict etymology but on historical context and usage, and many people consider the origins of the term during a period of intense colonialism and racism as enough reason to ditch it
How??? One ocean covers nearly ½ the distance around the Earth. As you look at human settlement, the Orient is east, Europe and the Americas are west. Sorry if that's not being Midway Island centric enough.
Well given the proximity of East Asia to the global centre of population (which is somewhere around eastern Kazakhstan or western Xinjiang, China - the latter actually being in East Asia, technically), I'd say the term 'Far' doesn't have much applicability to most humans alive today. For me, living in Australia, the 'Far East' is actually northwest and much closer than Europe or North America. In fact, some of the population of Indonesia, most of the population of Japan and Australia, all of the population PNG and New Zealand and most of the Pacific Island countries are east of China's easternmost point, as well as parts of Russia. Thus I think East Asia (or Northeast Asia, to match with Southeast Asia) is a better term, as it doesn't privilege any particular frame of reference, merely pointing to where the region sits in its continent.
Not really, it is one if the world's most significant global cities (https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.citylab.com/amp/article/386315/) and virtually it's own country (no surprises that Singapore, which is actually its own country ranks even higher). More noteworthy that Tokyo is so low.
I love this bullet point at the bottom of the list in the source:
"Angelsberg is a Luxemburg town of some 300 people. Somehow it logged 37.0 million views in two months in 2015. That year it was second only to the Main page in the number of views"
Presumably one publicity stunt. I think it should be filled in already but out between three and four. Or you should have to guess it and it could be a way to tell how many people are cheating.
1. Views: 60.4 m. Location: North America. City: New York City
2. Views: 51.0 m. Location: Europe. City: London
3. Views: 48.3 m. Location: Southeast Asia. City: Singapore
4. Views: 44.0 m. Location: Luxembourg, Europe. Village: Anglesberg (if you got this first time you were so cheating)
5. Views: 37.2 m. Location: Far East. CIty: Hong Kong.
presumably because it is not so common to search for them. If you do, congrats you have an uncommon but education hobby. Seriously though its probably because most traffic on wikipedia comes from Europe or North America.
I would guess the figures are so high for the featured cities because they are popular travel destinations for Western tourists, who use Wiki to find advance information on their travel destination.
There is comparatively little tourist traffic in Africa.
Please bear in mind this is a suggestion that I have not researched :)
I personally was surprised that Pompeii and Sparta made it on this list but not a lot of major world cities today, like Beijing, Seoul, Delhi, Bangkok, or Mexico City.
It's probably one of the few places worthy of remembering for a layman between the USA and Argentina.
There's well-known cities in Mexico, like Tijuana, but no one wants to go to Mexico. Then.. the Panama Canal, which probably doesn't make most top-ten vacation lists. Unsafe Bogota, overpopulated metropolises/slums in Brazil, failed Argentina, boring Chile.
Machu Picchu looks pretty, safe, and impressive. It's also fun to say / easy to remember. Maybe an argument can be made for Cusco, or Tikal, but they're less familiar, and who cares when there's Machu Picchu.
I guess the Caribbean also comes up, but cities aren't really relevant in such small countries - on a world stage. Aside from maybe Havana, which most people have probably seen on TV, and how many people really want to spend money + time to see 70 year old American cars while rolling the dice on getting diarrhea.
Macchu Picchu was a small village, with a population of about 750, in an area the size of two football fields. It feels like a stretch to include this as a "city" here.
We just ride the euphemism treadmill powered by our smooth, smooth brains
"Angelsberg is a Luxemburg town of some 300 people. Somehow it logged 37.0 million views in two months in 2015. That year it was second only to the Main page in the number of views"
1. Views: 60.4 m. Location: North America. City: New York City
2. Views: 51.0 m. Location: Europe. City: London
3. Views: 48.3 m. Location: Southeast Asia. City: Singapore
4. Views: 44.0 m. Location: Luxembourg, Europe. Village: Anglesberg (if you got this first time you were so cheating)
5. Views: 37.2 m. Location: Far East. CIty: Hong Kong.
There is comparatively little tourist traffic in Africa.
Please bear in mind this is a suggestion that I have not researched :)
There's well-known cities in Mexico, like Tijuana, but no one wants to go to Mexico. Then.. the Panama Canal, which probably doesn't make most top-ten vacation lists. Unsafe Bogota, overpopulated metropolises/slums in Brazil, failed Argentina, boring Chile.
Machu Picchu looks pretty, safe, and impressive. It's also fun to say / easy to remember. Maybe an argument can be made for Cusco, or Tikal, but they're less familiar, and who cares when there's Machu Picchu.
I guess the Caribbean also comes up, but cities aren't really relevant in such small countries - on a world stage. Aside from maybe Havana, which most people have probably seen on TV, and how many people really want to spend money + time to see 70 year old American cars while rolling the dice on getting diarrhea.