Also I know Myanmar was killing the Rohingyas but why would Americans not of South Asian descent be in enough danger for the US to tell them not to go there?
Tonga had a volcano eruption earlier this year, so its probably more a of "plz don't go, they're recovering and there aren't a ton a services if some thing goes wrong". Belarus because of their involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war and what happened with than Ryanair flight.
...US Department of State currently recommends US citizens Reconsider Travel to Papua New Guinea due to crime and civil unrest. Exercise increased caution due to unexploded ordinance, ongoing elections, and volcanic activity. Some areas have increased risk
No, it's back down to 3. There's no hatred towards foreigners here, just the occasional crime of opportunity that's beyond the authorities' ability to deal with..
while i've heard your sentiment from americans I have to say... americas violent crime rates are so low that you could probably avoid being the victim of anything more than a fistfight or a pickpocket even if you stay here your whole life and go to every town. people online and on the news hype up the small numbers to pick on young people and poor people and black people. its stupid especially since crime numbers are down, at least when the economy is not in shambles because of bad executive policies. with like, normal procautions you will never have to worry unless your in a poor neighborhood, in which case, you already know how this stuff works
Really enjoyed this, I used to go onto the Foreign Office website at my old job when I was bored to see which countries had areas (or were fully) red, so that travel was not advised.
I'd be interested to see what differences there were with a UK list, slightly fewer countries I imagine.
This challenge led Commander-in-Chief Sr. General MIN AUNG HLAING (MAH) to launch a coup in February 2021 that has left Burma reeling with the return to authoritarian rule, the detention of ASSK and thousands of pro-democracy actors, and renewed brutal repression against protestors, widespread violence, and economic decline.
..In May 2021, the NUG announced the formation of an an armed wing called the People's Defense Force, and in September announced the start of an insurgency against the military junta that has continued into 2022.
... The US Department of State currently recommends US citizens DO NOT TRAVEL to Burma due to civil unrest and armed conflict. Reconsider travel to Burma due to limited and/or inadequate healthcare resources. Exercise increased caution due to wrongful detentions and areas with land mines and unexploded ordnance.
No, what I meant was, I hope countries don't get banned for stupid reasons, remember in 2021 when Sweden was on here for "Covid stuff". If a country like DPRK for example, is actually unsafe, then that's understandable, so are countries that are ravaged by war. But if its for a reason like "Covid stuff" when Covid cases are low, then that's a bad reason to ban a country!
Yeah, the list is bad. Puerto Vallarta is in a Level 3 "Reconsider Travel" area. It's a little silly. There are loads of tourists. It's perfectly safe. Much safer than Chicago or New Orleans.
OMG QUIZMASTER REPLIED!!! Yeah Ur right, the USA government is saying "Oh Kiribati is unsafe due to COVID-19!!!" Yet places like New Orleans or Skid Row have tons of violence and crime, yet are considered "Safer"...
Military coups and militant jihadists have destabilized the already poor country. Reports of violence, kidnappings and mass killings are becoming the norm. The US government would very likely be unable to assist any citizens who find themselves in peril, including NGO and aid workers. It's a tragic situation.
That is funny, on the website you habe to "exercice increased caution" in Denmark, the Netherlands, Austria, Italy, Spain, Germany or France, the same level as Eritrea, Congo, Peru or Israel. I didn't realize that I was living in such a dangerous continent :D
Russia is WAY more prone to kidnapping American citizens to use as political leverage than China is. I'm guessing that's a big part of why North Korea is on this list actually.
UPDATE: Aug 2, 2023 / The United States Department of State has raised the travel advisory for the Republic of the Niger to Level 4 due to the rising tensions in the country.
In addition to the countries having a coup currently in Africa, I think Armenia and Azerbaijan will be added due to Nogorno-Karabakh and ethnic cleansing there. Though the conflict is getting minimal attention in the USA.
I've been in Iraq, Burkina Faso, Mali, Russia and Ukraine. I don't consider them to be really risky, just if you avoid to go to the war front. In fact walking around their cities is safer than doing the same in US.
A lot of the status is more a matter of "If something did happen to you, can we as the state department intervene on your behalf and assist to get you out of the mess and/or get assurance that you are treated fairly." Countries where large areas are held by factions that aren't the recognized national government aren't going to be nearly as accommodating. China can and often will be difficult to work with but there is no mistaking who speaks for the people in the Wuhan province. Likewise if there is a entire country ruling regime that repeatedly dismisses the inquiries of the the US government like Russia, they are going to be rated a a higher risk.
I feel like everyone should have gotten North Korea and Iran or Afghanistan. I have seen North Korea before from the SOUTH Korean side of the DMZ in June 2023. My watch kept saying be careful in Korean. It was a cool experience but also scary because when the bus was driving to the Dora Observatory there were a bunch of active land mines on the sides of the road. It was scary but cool at the same time. Don't go to North Korea.
The most dangerous part about North Korea is definitely arbitrary detention. A while back, there was that young American man who was framed for taking a North Korean propaganda poster from his hotel as a souvenir. Whether or not he actually took the poster was controversial, but he was tortured and eventually returned to the US in a brain dead state.
Massive governmental instability and various militant groups across the country would make it extremely difficult for the U.S. government to assist any American citizens in the event they need rescuing or aid.
There is conflict between rebel group (mostly islamic to my understanding linked to Al-Qaeda and Islamic state) and Malian army (linked to Wagner group), they are fighting for indepence of northern part of Mali. Those fights are pretty large scale and back and fort. Rebel groups kill civilians without anz prior warning, but from what I found Malian army is pretty brutal in their fight aswell.
It's safe, but Americans will get arrested by their own government for spending any amount of money there. So you'd think if the entire point of a travel advisory is about your safety and freedom that the U.S. government would warn its citizens of the dangers they themselves impose for going to Cuba.
You don't have to worry about not travelling to any of these countries - you can bring all their traits right home to the USA, home to 1.5 million Haitians, 0.4 million Afghanis, 0.2 million Somalis, 0.1 million Iraqis, etc. for some reason.
"For some reason." Unless you're entirely Native American, you should keep your mouth shut about people immigrating to the United States. They have just as much right to move here as any people from any other country now and throughout history. Don't bring your bigotry here.
I know you're not worth engaging, but for any reasonable people pondering this, keep in mind that a lot of the immigrants we take from countries we're active in, are those who were on our side.
I've known an Afghani family. They're wonderful. They were allowed to immigrate here because their family members risked and lost their own lives helping the US government fight the Taliban. It wasn't safe for the family to stay.
The US government honored their help and returned the favor as best as we could.
There's a lot of talk by people like Rabble up here that we're "importing terrorism" or other such nonsense. We're not. We're bringing in the people who fought the terrorists.
It's like how a so many American Vietnamese are descendants of people who worked against the Viet Cong. We weren't "importing communism" when we let them in.
Also I know Myanmar was killing the Rohingyas but why would Americans not of South Asian descent be in enough danger for the US to tell them not to go there?
...US Department of State currently recommends US citizens Reconsider Travel to Papua New Guinea due to crime and civil unrest. Exercise increased caution due to unexploded ordinance, ongoing elections, and volcanic activity. Some areas have increased risk
Crazy how fast things change
I'd be interested to see what differences there were with a UK list, slightly fewer countries I imagine.
This challenge led Commander-in-Chief Sr. General MIN AUNG HLAING (MAH) to launch a coup in February 2021 that has left Burma reeling with the return to authoritarian rule, the detention of ASSK and thousands of pro-democracy actors, and renewed brutal repression against protestors, widespread violence, and economic decline.
..In May 2021, the NUG announced the formation of an an armed wing called the People's Defense Force, and in September announced the start of an insurgency against the military junta that has continued into 2022.
... The US Department of State currently recommends US citizens DO NOT TRAVEL to Burma due to civil unrest and armed conflict. Reconsider travel to Burma due to limited and/or inadequate healthcare resources. Exercise increased caution due to wrongful detentions and areas with land mines and unexploded ordnance.
Covid just made it even stupider.
Turn forever hand in ha-
*gets decapitated via rogue spinning windmill blades*
Ազատ անկախ Հայաստան 🇦🇲
I've been to 4 of these countries :)
1 trillion dollars every 100 days
and wdym for some reason, the reason is quite obvious
I've known an Afghani family. They're wonderful. They were allowed to immigrate here because their family members risked and lost their own lives helping the US government fight the Taliban. It wasn't safe for the family to stay.
The US government honored their help and returned the favor as best as we could.
There's a lot of talk by people like Rabble up here that we're "importing terrorism" or other such nonsense. We're not. We're bringing in the people who fought the terrorists.
It's like how a so many American Vietnamese are descendants of people who worked against the Viet Cong. We weren't "importing communism" when we let them in.
quiz ends with one answer remaining
"central african republic"
naww really