Yiddish and Penn Dutch (Deutsch) are both variants (i won't call them dialects for fear of angering someone) of German. I've heard that some folks that know one are able to understand the other, some don't.
Ridiculous. Hindi and Urdu are counted separately, French and Haitian creole are counted separately, but Igbo and Yoruba are counted together? Igbo and Yoruba are definitely separate languages, not dialects of each other.
Could you do one for Australia, if you have the data? The same languages are likely to be on there, but in a completely different order - the difference would be quite extraordinary.
Weird that the subcontinental Indian languages are listed separately (mostly) whereas all the Chinese languages are lumped into one! I can only guess this comes from the fact Chinese languages look the same when written down (well, bearing in mind the modern simplification).
Must be because India doesn't claim that everything is one language, also North Indian and South Indian languages, both of which have multiple major languages, are completely unrelated linguistically, so it wouldn't make sense; even China doesn't claim that minority languages unrelated to Chinese (Sinitic) languages are dialects.
Grand total there may be around 400k Native Americans in the USA, so even if all native languages were grouped in a single group (I doubt it's the case) and all spoke their ancestral language at home, they would still not make the list.
exactly, i was confused for a second. didn't think Nepali would be there but tried Marathi and they were grouped together lol. They don't even sound similar, both are completely different.
I wish they would have added aave and asl. aave is extremely common and different than english. asl is also often excluded from languages because it isnt a spoken language, but is still extremely valid and used through the country /:
Lumping Chinese as one language then splitting French from French Creole is just silly. And lazy. And before you ask, yes, I saw the disclaimer. All it means is that you've found the stats somewhere and made them into a rubbish quiz!
Why would Somali and Amharic be classified as interchangeable? They don't even belong to the same language family! Yet Hindi and Urdu (which is just Persianite Hindi) are different
Interesting, french would shoot up to 4th place if counted together with french creole.
But there are some wide varieties of creole. Louisiana creole sounds almost exactly like french but writes nothing alike, it looks transcribed with english rules. Haitian creole is further away from french.
Not only that, my (English) mother spoke Urdu. It’s reasonably well known in the UK, although, tbf, my mother was very much an anomaly as a white, English woman who could actually speak it. It did make visits to certain Asian-run shops very interesting…
Lots of strange choices for languages being grouped together, but I guess it can't be helped according to the source. Still nonsense that completely different languages like Amharic and Somali are grouped together but Urdu and Hindi which are literally the same language are not.
What? I thought a lot more languages would be here. Especially Turkish, Hebrew, or Navajo if we're including Native American languages. Anyways, nice quiz I guess.
What idiot at the Census Bureau decided Amharic and Somali were the same language? They're in completely different branches of Afro-Asiatic, further apart than Russian is from Old Prussian.
These groupings make absolutely no sense. Yoruba and Igbo are together, so are Marathi and Nepali, but for SOME reason Urdu and Hindi are separate entries. What??
But there are some wide varieties of creole. Louisiana creole sounds almost exactly like french but writes nothing alike, it looks transcribed with english rules. Haitian creole is further away from french.
And is the census inaccesible outside US or is it down?