Red Ruffing was someone I had never heard of. One reason for his high WAR was that he was a pitcher who could hit better than a typical position player, recording a career .269 average with 36 home runs.
I've thought about making some others, but many teams just haven't had enough stars. In any case, it'd be great if people would make one for other teams, but they probably won't be featured.
Here's a version for the Reds! (I figured there aren't too many fans of theirs around, so I'd go ahead and make it) http://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/103225/top-10-cincinnati-reds-of-all-time
WAR turns out to be a pretty good measure for this. Most commentators/journalists would largely agree although some might suggest Reggie Jackson rather than Dickey--but no one is old enough to remember him. Stats don't lie (much)!
Reggie only played 5 years with the Yankees which is why he doesn't appear on the list. Career WAR of 73.8, but only 17.1 with the Yankees. Also, apparently his defense was below average - something I didn't know!
It stands for "wins above replacement." It is an aggregate stat measuring how many more wins a player's team gets by virtue of his presence instead of the presence of a hypothetical, average ballplayer in his place. So in other words, the stat says that the Yankees won 142.7 more games with Babe Ruth than they would have with a hypothetical, average replacement. The stat is inclusive: it aggregates all the runs for which you are responsible on offense, including RBIs, runs scored, base running, sacrificing, etc., and all the runs you save with your defense. The stat gets a bit complicated, but a basic metric is that every 10 runs = 1 game. So, in all, Babe Ruth is measured to have contributed about 1,427 more runs (either scoring them or stopping them) than a replacement would have. This is not exactly how the stat works, but it should give you some idea.
An influential, early / mid-1970s funk-rock-soul band that for a while had the charismatic, gruff voiced, soulful ex-singer of The Animals, Eric Burdon. Their well know tunes include Spill The Wine, Why Can't We Be Friends? and Low Rider which is forever linked to Cheech and Chong.
Ok. Derek Jeter is not that great. I would take 20 other shortstops from other teams today above him in a draft. Tulowitzki can do a better Jeter than Jeter can.
I'm not a Jeter fan, but if he'd played his prime years in Colorado, his numbers would have been even better than they were. But then, maybe he would have been injured like Tulo.
Of course, on his worst day, Tulowitzki was a better fielder than Jeter on his best day.
Career WAR is a counting stat and Jeter played for a long time. Sure he was a below-average fielder but any time you can get his level of offensive production from the shortstop position that adds a lot of value.
Go look in the record books where he ranks in all major categories. Add that to the fact that the Yankees won 5 WS titles while he was playing. It speaks for itself.
Don't know about "all major categories." He's right near the top in hits and runs (which usually go hand-in-hand), but he's nowhere near exceptional in any other offensive category and his defense was below-average. His being on the team for five championships is more a statement of the Yankees' overall dominance than Jeter's. Those teams from '98-2000 probably could have won with me playing shortstop. Jeff Nelson won four rings with the Yankees. It doesn't make him an all-time great. So, really, Derek Jeter was an exceptional contact hitter. He is a deserving Hall-of-Famer, but Yankee fans do overstate his significance by mythologizing him.
I got them in sequence. Extra points? Actually, as I answered, I was worried Whitey Ford didn't make it, but when I saw the years for the last player I knew it was Ford.
WAR, of course, is inexact and one's career WAR can be fattened by a relatively unproductive but lengthy end of career.
Is this for one season? In 1920 the Yankees played 154 regular season games. Are they saying that if they had swapped out Babe Ruth for an average minor or major league player, they would have lost every game of the season but 11? And... with Babe Ruth on their team did they win every game but 11? (that would be a pretty astounding season) And all of those wins were solely attributable to him? I know Ruth is pretty overrated but that's kind of ridiculous still. Or is this based on his total career so 14 seasons of maybe 2156 games? Possibly more if this doesn't include playoff games? I guess if that's the case saying that Babe got them 143 wins in his career wouldn't be totally absurd. But I know almost nothing about baseball.
It's career WAR, so for Ruth it's all his value with the Yankees over the course of his career. Ruth's best season by WAR was 1923, in which he had 14. That is also the best season by WAR for any player, disregarding 19th century pitchers for which the model breaks down completely. Ruth also has the number two and three seasons for position players, and has the career record as well, although Barry Bonds edges him out if you exclude Ruth's pitching.
It's also worth noting that a teams total WAR rates them relative to a hypothetical team of minor league scrubs which would be expected to win 40-45 games in a season.
Of course, on his worst day, Tulowitzki was a better fielder than Jeter on his best day.
WAR, of course, is inexact and one's career WAR can be fattened by a relatively unproductive but lengthy end of career.
It's also worth noting that a teams total WAR rates them relative to a hypothetical team of minor league scrubs which would be expected to win 40-45 games in a season.