Can you name the countries of the world that either don't have an active U.S. embassy or whose U.S. embassy is located in the territory of another country?
Based on this source with corrections for accuracy
One of these countries has a de-facto embassy, but no de-jure embassy
As of today the US Embassy in Khartoum, Sudan is closed due to the ongoing violence in the country. To avoid resetting this quiz too many times I'll hold off on updating the quiz for a bit to see if it reopens soon, but if not it will be added in the coming weeks
How do you divide ambassadors accredited for other countries, which is probably the case for all but 4 or 5 countries without diplomatic relations? The Bridgetown embassy has also the Eastern Caribbean title, but there's also Madagascar&Comoros (https://mg.usembassy.gov/), PNG, Solomon&Vanuatu (https://pg.usembassy.gov/) etc.
The division criterium I used is based on the source. Where it states "US ambassador of ... is also accredited to ...", I have interpreted this as there being no embassy for this country specifically. This is the case for the Comoros, Solomons, and Vanuatu. In the case of e.g. Dominica, it states "The US embassy to Dominica is located in Barbados.", which I interpreted as there being a more defined embassy within the Eastern Caribbean embassy.
This division is of course slightly subjective, but by using the terminology used in the source as a divider I tried to get it as objective as possible.
I am surprised to see that Taiwan is on here. I would have thought that the US would have an embassy there considering the situation with China and Taiwan's position in many industries.
The official name of Taiwan is Republic of China. Unlike the Koreas, the Chinas do not allow other countries to have diplomatic relations with both China at the same time due to the one China policy. Countries that officially recognize Taipei government cannot officially recognize the Beijing government and vice versa. Except for Bhutan, which is the only country that has not established diplomatic relations with either side, all other countries have chosen between the two.
Taiwan has a functioning government and full sovereign control over its territory (or at least over the territory that surrounds its capital) even while some countries, for reasons of politics, do not recognize its sovereignty. It's as much a country as, say, Israel or Kosovo.
Palestine enjoys some international recognition, again for political reasons, even while not actually being a functioning sovereign country. It's in the same category as Western Sahara.
Taiwan is considered a country because it's a country, whilst Palestine isn't considered a country because it's not a country. I hope that clears it up for you!
That's really not a criterion. Membership in the UN is voluntary, a country may apply or not, and be accepted or not. Vatican isn't a member, Switzerland wasn't until fairly recently.
There are a lot of other smaller, poorer, less notable countries than Nepal that also have embassies. For example, Burundi isn't on this list. Neither are East Timor, Djibouti, Togo... I could go on and on. What's so surprising about Nepal having a US embassy?
The embassy in Barbados is called "The US Embassy in Barbados, the Eastern Caribbean, and the OECS". The ambassador to Barbados is essentially the ambassador to all small Caribbean island nations, while the other (larger) Caribbean island nations have their own embassy. As to why they chose Barbados instead of one of the five others, I don't know
Historically Barbados has been more developed, with a larger economy, has had easier access (via regular International flights etc.) to the outside world, has had a higher tourist trade (i.e.: more Americans there), etc. than most other Caribbean island nations, and so has been the region's economic and diplomatic hub and service centre acting on behalf of several of those other nations.
Recently (in the last 30-ish years) that's been less the case than it used to be (although it still is, even if to a lesser extent), but those historical factors exhibit a strong pull: if the embassy is already there, has been for many decades, and has been functioning smoothly all this time, then why change it?
Solomon Islands should be on this list as relations are handled by the embassy in Papua New Guinea (same as Vanuatu). Also there is now a US embassy in Apia, Samoa, with a charge d'affaires. The website is at ws.usembassy.gov. FWIW, I would break out the "no embassy" list into those where the US has no diplomatic relations vs those where an embassy in another country also handles relations with that country.
The Wikipedia list that is the source has Seychelles with no embassy. It says that the ambassador accredited to Mauritius is also accredited to Seychelles.
I facepalmed myself through my face all the way to the wall behind me when I got all the answers except Iran. The time limit can really create some brain glitches sometimes.
This division is of course slightly subjective, but by using the terminology used in the source as a divider I tried to get it as objective as possible.
Palestine enjoys some international recognition, again for political reasons, even while not actually being a functioning sovereign country. It's in the same category as Western Sahara.
JetPunk standards. Neither are in the UN--until that changes, neither are official countries.
Recently (in the last 30-ish years) that's been less the case than it used to be (although it still is, even if to a lesser extent), but those historical factors exhibit a strong pull: if the embassy is already there, has been for many decades, and has been functioning smoothly all this time, then why change it?