Featured Quizzes
User Quizzes
Create Quiz
Data and Charts
Badges and Games
About JetPunk
Message Board
Dark Mode
Statistics for International Commercial Law - Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Click here to take the quiz!
General Stats
- This quiz has been taken 5 times
- The average score is 8 of 11
Answer Stats
| Question | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| What was the primary legal outcome of the Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell case in the Hague District Court in 2021? | Royal Dutch Shell was ordered to reduce CO2 emissions by net 45% by 2030, compared to 2019 levels | 100%
|
| : In the Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell case, the court’s decision emphasized the need for Shell to act in line with scientific findings on climate change. Which of the following was a key consideration? | Shell’s emissions policies should be in line with the goals to limit global temperature rise to well below 2°C, preferably 1.5°C, as per the Paris Agreement. | 100%
|
| What was a significant reason the Hague District Court ruled against Royal Dutch Shell in this Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell case? | Shell’s existing climate policies were deemed insufficient to meet the targets set by the Paris Agreement. | 100%
|
| On what basis did the Hague District Court impose the CO2 reduction obligation on Royal Dutch Shell in the Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell case? | The court found that Shell’s current corporate policy was not aligned with its duty of care to mitigate climate change impacts. | 100%
|
| What key international climate agreement did the Hague District Court cite in its decision to impose CO2 reduction obligations on Royal Dutch Shell in the Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell case? | The Paris Agreement. | 100%
|
| In the Vedanta Resources v Lungowe case, what did the claimants allege against Vedanta Resources PLC? | Vedanta exercised a high level of control over KCM’s mining operations and environmental practices. | 100%
|
| In Vedanta Resources v Lungowe, how did the UK Supreme Court describe Vedanta’s role in relation to the environmental harm caused by KCM? | Vedanta exercised supervision and control over KCM’s environmental and health standards. | 100%
|
| What was the primary legal issue addressed in the appeal in the case of Vedanta Resources v Lungowe (2019)? | Whether the English courts had jurisdiction to hear the claims. | 100%
|
| How did the court in the Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell case view Royal Dutch Shell’s corporate responsibility in the context of climate change? | Shell had a duty of care to reduce emissions globally, across all its activities and products. | 0%
|
| What was one of the key arguments made by the appellants (Vedanta and KCM) regarding jurisdiction in Vedanta Resources v Lungowe? | The case should be heard in Zambia as the primary jurisdiction because the environmental damage occurred there. | 0%
|
| What was a significant reason why the claimants preferred to bring their case in the English courts rather than the Zambian courts in Vedanta Resources v Lungowe? | The claimants feared that KCM might not have sufficient resources to satisfy a judgment in Zambia. | 0%
|
No matching quizzes found
Score Distribution
Percentile by Number Answered
Percent of People with Each Score
New and Popular
Save Your Progress