I must admit, the title of the series is more ironic than literal; the series is actually about catching mistakes that slip past automated spelling checkers. The cause of any given mistake will of course vary from instance to instance: one person who writes "steel" when he means "steal" might be making a spelling error; another who does the same thing might be confused about which word is which; and a third might simply be making a typo.
Oh if you want to continue the series a good place to find errors is the world of fanfiction. Among other things it's taught me the wonderful colour "peach black" :)
YouTube comment section is as far as anyone need go to find every spelling mistake ever committed condensed into one innocent video of how John Travolta really did 9/11 with Alex Jones hired by Boutros Boutros Boutros Boutros Gali to mastermind the coverup.
There's really nothing wrong with the spelling or use of the word flaunting. It could mean someone who is ostentatiously exhibiting the rules (to the apparent dismay of the person asking the question).
That's true. Since "flout" and "flaunt" are both transitive verbs, any context in which one is grammatical will also be a context in which the other is grammatical. Nevertheless, when you see the phrase "flaunting the rules", it's a safe bet that you're looking at a spelling error.
The description should probably point this out, but I think the point of the quiz is to identify commonly misused words that people don't realize they've misused because the error is not caught by spellcheck.
The title is great! You are missing a key issue here. When people rely on automated spell checkers only, there are often a lot of usage mistakes and conflated words.
really?? you give one star for that? But really if you use a different word than the one you mean, you are spelling it wrong, just like when people use too, when they really mean to.
Length and breath of the continent? Is the continent breathing? The intended word is derived from 'broad', which hopefully will tell you what letter is missing from the given phrase.
I know the difference between the words, and one is transitive while the other is intransitive, but the way that language, especially spoken language, is often used where words are omitted but implied I can understand the sentence as she was laying herself down and I think then at least the spelling would be correct.
I had a problem with this one because even if you corrected grizzly to grisly it didn't appear to make sense. Have never seen "effect" used in this way.
If you look at its use it has been around for a long time and has actually been decreasing since about 1850. So you sort of have that backwards, it is something going out of fashion instead of "a new word being forced" unless with millennial you are referring to the 1900's....
Dammit, got everything easily except dice/dies. Because I had no idea what that was. Quiz overall: spelling/grammar win, general knowledge fail. (For me, that is. Not the quiz. It knew the things. I did not know the things.)
Well if you are trying to spell the word meaning prologue ( foreword) and spell it as forward I would say that that is a spelling error. In most of these cases the people actually meant the correct word. Some times people do no know the meaning of a word, (like affect and effect, and intentionaly write the word they think is correct in that context).
Like noone would have meant "insect" Bea, they definitely meant wife of uncle.
Only the cases when if you used a synonym and people would say, no that is not what I was trying to say. Would not be a matter of being spelled wrong. That is my opinion on it.
(And sorry if there is any bad grammar or construction of sentences in this, I am sure there is, English is not my mother tongue)
No, he is right. Effect is a noun, while affect is a verb. The sentence uses it as a verb, so it is supposed to be affected. I can’t believe no one else has pointed this out.
okay, this quiz is crap. "flaunting," "dice," and "appraised" or not "misspellings" in the sense that the others are misspellings; they're different words altogether, but perhaps used incorrectly. there's a big, big difference.
Just in theory. The people using the wrong word/spelling do in most case have the correct meaning/word in mind. They just can't bloody remember how to spell it and come up with something that looks write.
It isn't written wrongly. "Effected" makes sense. The chainsaw massacre resulted in a grisly scene, it didn't affect a grisly scene that was already there. That's just too much carnage :P
Only missed chafed, succession, metes, apprised and flouting. Not bad when english not your language :) Bummed I didnt get chafed though, I was trying to spell it right, but ran out of time. Have never heard of flouting, apprised and metes though.
"How do you get away with so openly flaunting the rules?" I honestly had no idea what word you were going for there, as this made no sense at all to me as it was written. As I was looking for a misspelled word, I was simply at a loss. "The drunkard walked a meandering course with a wobbly gate." This is also correct. I pictured a path that contained a gate that wobbled on its hinges. "Do not trust the coinage, several dice have been stolen from the Mint." Again, no idea what you were trying to say here, since the Mint does not have anything to do with dice, but I was searching for a misspelled word... Many of the others confused me as well, as they were nothing to do with spelling errors and were simply usage errors. It's a shame, because this could have been fun for me, but instead simply caused me stress.
I thought longue was wrong at first, i always thought it was pre Madonna and you used the wrong affected. It should be an a because it is the one affecting something rather than the end result of the effect
"Annoyed I got a couple wrong, that I just KNEW I should have had right, I'm going to enter a comment. On a quiz that has been on the site for more than six years, has been taken over 30k times, and generated 100+ comments, I'm certain NO ONE ELSE has mentioned MY particular complaint!"
I couldn't figure out what was wrong. I was picturing bears with chainsaws.
If you are just talking about effected it means, well to cause the effect.. to give an outcome (not to be confused with to affect that outcome)
Like noone would have meant "insect" Bea, they definitely meant wife of uncle.
Only the cases when if you used a synonym and people would say, no that is not what I was trying to say. Would not be a matter of being spelled wrong. That is my opinion on it.
(And sorry if there is any bad grammar or construction of sentences in this, I am sure there is, English is not my mother tongue)
The word it’s is always short for ‘it is’ (as in it's raining), or in informal speech, for ‘it has’ (as in it's got six legs).
The word its means ‘belonging to it’ (as in hold its head still while I jump on its back). It is a possessive pronoun like his.
I don't get how you didn't realize áll of the words in this quiz are existing words. Really, how could you miss that?
* Just as a quick test, see if you can tell which of the following words
are mispelled
supercede
conceed
idiosyncracy
concensus
accomodate
impressario
rhythym
opthalmologist
diptheriea
anamoly
afficianado
caesarian
grafitti
In fact, they all are. So was misspelled at the end of the
preceeding paragraph. So was preceding just there. I'm sorry,
I'll stop. But I trust you get the point that English can be a
maddeningly difficult language to spell correctly.
It is simply not the same meaning.
If we need to guess what the person really wanted to say but didn't use the proper word for it, it will be really hard.