The way the Great Leap Forward question is worded, I first thought the answer was China, before getting Mao Zedong. Both answer's are technically correct, but only Mao is accepted.
jetpunk is the only place where the reply about how to reply to a comment about a grammatical error got more upvotes than the reply about a grammatical error got more upvotes than the original comment.
the landmines thing is very true - when i was in cambodia there were multiple fields with warning signs saying that i was in danger of blowing up and dying from entering the field bc of landmines
Don't be a jerk. I'm glad that people talk about experiences they've had. I may or may not ever go to a particular country, but the world is a beautiful place to explore and I enjoy reading people's accounts. No one's boasting. Except maybe Kal, but he's a staple on here that we have all come to love, and a lot of times he adds insightful commentary when it comes to travel-related quizzes, so his contributions far outweigh the occasional boast.
Anyway, the point is, be open to learning something other than snark. Or if not, at least play nice and keep scrolling.
In Chinese languages, the tradition is to put the family name as the first name. This means that "Mao" is actually the "last name" of Mao Zedong, so it makes sense to accept that and not "Zedong." I'll leave it up to QuizMaster to decide whether to accept it though.
suggest accepting Mekhong as an alternate spelling for Mekong. In Thai and Khmer as well, the softer "g" sound is often transliterated as "k" while the harder "k" is transliterated as "kh." That's why Khmer is spelled the way it is and not as Kmer.
I'm not familiar with Khmer, it is probably similar, but in Thai the "h" after a consonant doesn't mean it is "hard" or "soft," it means that it's an aspirated consonant. Aspiration in the language can change which phoneme you are using, same as in Hindi, and unlike English- where the aspirated /p/ at the beginning of "pill" and the non-aspirated /p/ at the end of "stop" are understood by native-speakers to be the same sound, even though they're not.
Shouldn't the Pol Pot question be "responsible for" instead of just "blamed for"... The question indicates that he might not have been such a bad guy - or is it just my lacking english skills?
Nope, it was definitely a more substantial number.
Even the lowest death estimate, which is about 1 million, would still be over 10% of the population at the time of the Khmer Rouge, but 1.5-2 million is a widely accepted estimate, which would be close to, or over a quarter of the Cambodian population at that time.
Anyway, the point is, be open to learning something other than snark. Or if not, at least play nice and keep scrolling.
So khmer language might have more consonants or vowels than any other language, but for sure it doesn't have more letters.
I know I'm nit-picking a bit, but I was completely mislead by the question.
Even the lowest death estimate, which is about 1 million, would still be over 10% of the population at the time of the Khmer Rouge, but 1.5-2 million is a widely accepted estimate, which would be close to, or over a quarter of the Cambodian population at that time.