| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency Expecations | Access | 0%
|
| access control | 0%
| |
| addname | 0%
| |
| Microkernel provides these basic abstractions | Address space | 0%
|
| arbitrary | 0%
| |
| Asynchronicity | 0%
| |
| at least once | 0%
| |
| at most once | 0%
| |
| Availability | 0%
| |
| availability | 0%
| |
| block | 0%
| |
| broken passwords | 0%
| |
| Checksum | 0%
| |
| Client | 0%
| |
| Architectural Models | Client-server | 0%
|
| cluster | 0%
| |
| commit | 0%
| |
| communication | 0%
| |
| Components of RPC system | Communication | 0%
|
| Communication Manager | 0%
| |
| Benefits of Threads | Consequences of using DS | Concurrency | 0%
|
| Possible failures in UDP | Data corruption | 0%
|
| Data types | 0%
| |
| delayed-write | 0%
| |
| device | 0%
| |
| Modules in a file system (DFS) | directory | 0%
|
| Dispatcher | 0%
| |
| XML > JSON | Displayable | 0%
|
| distributed message queue | 0%
| |
| distributed shared memory | 0%
| |
| DOS | 0%
| |
| attack types | eavesdropping | 0%
|
| Reasons to use DS | Economy | 0%
|
| worst case assumptions | exposed interface | 0%
|
| Threads in java | Extend Thread | 0%
|
| Failure | 0%
| |
| file | 0%
| |
| file access | 0%
| |
| getnames | 0%
| |
| Global Clock | 0%
| |
| Heterogeneity | 0%
| |
| idempotent | 0%
| |
| Implement Runnable | 0%
| |
| insecure network | 0%
| |
| integrity | 0%
| |
| Navigation types | iterative | 0%
|
| threat categories | leakage | 0%
|
| Location | 0%
| |
| directory service operations | lookup | 0%
|
| masquerading | 0%
| |
| invocation semantics | maybe | 0%
|
| Mechanism | 0%
| |
| Memory Manager | 0%
| |
| mobile agent | 0%
| |
| Mobility | 0%
| |
| Modularity | 0%
| |
| multicast | 0%
| |
| OS-level concurrency | Multitasking | 0%
|
| Application-level concurrency | Multithreading | 0%
|
| multi-tier | 0%
| |
| thread life cycle | new | 0%
|
| Non-blocking | 0%
| |
| non-recursive server | 0%
| |
| non-runnable | 0%
| |
| Types of failures | omission | 0%
|
| Omission failure | 0%
| |
| Order | 0%
| |
| What does DOS share that NOS does not? | OS | 0%
|
| p2p | 0%
| |
| Performance | 0%
| |
| OS basic components | Policy | 0%
|
| Security goals | privacy | 0%
|
| OS Components | Process Manager | 0%
|
| proxy server | 0%
| |
| Indirect communication systems | publish subscribe | 0%
|
| Reactive UI | 0%
| |
| Readable | 0%
| |
| caching strategies | read-ahead | 0%
|
| recursive server | 0%
| |
| Reliability | 0%
| |
| Components of RMI system | Remote interface | 0%
|
| replaying | 0%
| |
| Failure mitigations | Replication | 0%
|
| Remote invocation protocols | Request | 0%
|
| Request-Reply | 0%
| |
| Request-Reply-Acknowledge | 0%
| |
| resourced attacker | 0%
| |
| runnable | 0%
| |
| running | 0%
| |
| Scalability | 0%
| |
| Scaling | 0%
| |
| Servant Component | 0%
| |
| Server | 0%
| |
| Server stub | 0%
| |
| JSON > XML | Simpler | 0%
|
| source code available | 0%
| |
| space uncoupling | 0%
| |
| How is FFS different from UNIX | stateless | 0%
|
| Stub procedure | 0%
| |
| Supervisor | 0%
| |
| Supports arrays | 0%
| |
| tampering | 0%
| |
| TCP | 0%
| |
| terminated | 0%
| |
| thin client | 0%
| |
| Thread Manager | 0%
| |
| Thread per connection | 0%
| |
| Thread per object | 0%
| |
| Thread per request | 0%
| |
| threads | 0%
| |
| Aspects of indirect communication | Time uncoupling | 0%
|
| timing | 0%
| |
| tuple space | 0%
| |
| two-tier | 0%
| |
| Socket Protocols | UDP | 0%
|
| unname | 0%
| |
| Kernel modes | User | 0%
|
| vandalism | 0%
| |
| web applet | 0%
| |
| Thread Architectures | Worker pool | 0%
|
| Caching policy options | write-through | 0%
|