I find that funny, as I found this extremely hard. Not my strong suit clearly. I only got 9. But what I don't understand is why 70% got the Chagatai Khanate (never heard of it) and only 36% got the Mayans (everyone knows them).
Tips for anyone trying to ace this quiz: Tamil, Telugu, and Bengal will be accepted for the major Indian empires (you have to enter all three), German will be accepted for Holy Roman, Ethiopian will be accepted for Ethiopian and Aksumite, Korean will be accepted for Goryeo and Gogoryeo, Cambodian will be accepted for Khmer, Turkish will be accepted for Ottoman, Peruvian for Wari, Nigerian for both Bornu and Oyo, Persian for both Parthian and Sassanid, Mongol for the Chagatai Khanate, Sumatran for Satavahana, and Chinese will work in place of Han. The less known ones you'll just have to remember include the Frankish Empire, Armenian Empire, Micronesian Empire, Kanem Empire, and the Ghana Empire. And Carthage seems to elude most people as well, though that one is pretty well known so I don't know why.
Surprising not to see the Assyrian, Babylonian, British and Aztec, Olmec and Inca Empires in there. Pretty tough quiz when my 15/35 beats 90% of people. Shoulda got Frankish though.
Good job! :) and thanks for all the comments. Feedback is nice. It IS a tough quiz. and I thought it was interesting for that reason. When people think of great empires, they usually don't think of many of these. Even those that lasted 1,000 years I'm sure some have never heard of. Incidentally the British Empire missed out on being included by *just* a hair, having an official duration of 394 years. I made the cut-off 400 years, in part because it was a nice round number, and in part because dropping it much lower would raise the question of whether or not I should include the USA and I didn't feel like getting in to the argument of whether or not America was an empire, since I probably would have included them.
btw, Assyrian: 325 years. Babylonian: 300 years. Aztec: 93 years. The Olmec civilization we have scant information about, we don't know how long it really lasted, and it is not usually classified as an empire. However, the Mayan Empire which grew out of Olmec culture is on this list as the longest-lasting empire ever. We're not even 100% sure how long that one lasted, though, because of the very spotty historical records that remain.
Not sure what you mean. I agree with many historians that America is an empire in every sense except name, but, I didn't include them on the quiz because whether you believe that or not, the duration of their empire has not been more than 400 years.
Sorry, just joking. I think an empire is a little tough to define sometimes. If you asked the Greeks they'd be talking about Athenian, Spartan, Macedonian and Ptolemeyic empires. But maybe we see things differently.
? I wasn't mad, I got that you were joking, I guess I was just too dense to see exactly what the joke was. I agree, definition of empire is a pretty amorphous one. I think it's funny that people IN the United States resist the term empire because it has negative connotations there that they don't want to be associated with. People outisde of the the USA resist calling the US an empire because of the bitterness/resentment/inferiority complex thing and they don't want to afford the US the same status that their own country had at one point in history, as a point of pride. So Americans often take the label as an insult and resist it for this reason while outsiders see it as praise and resist it for this reason. Personally I would definitely count the US as an empire, even though in composition and organization it is very different from classical empires. I say that's just a sign of the fact that times have changed, though.
The US has extended its sphere of influence over the entire world, militarily, politically, economically, and culturally. What the Romans did with garrisons and roads the United States has done with McDonald's franchises and the internet. Not to say that the US hasn't set up more than its share of military bases. Even take all those away and you've still got Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, etc. Take those away and you still have the fact that the Europeans who inhabited the original 13 colonies began expanding their territorial control almost immediately over the rest of the continent, over indigenous people who were not at first included in the empire. Now all of those people are part of it. They're all American. But the Romans also granted citizenship to the people they had conquered and we still count them as a proper empire. The only sense really in which America isn't an empire is that it has nobody with the title emperor, unless you count the "drug czar."
but anyway you were right if you were saying what I think you were saying- and yeah.. I put the cap where it was for 3 reasons. 1) it was a nice round number. 2) just happened to be barely high enough to exlude the British. 3) to avoid the question of whether or not to include the USA.
Interesting stuff. Yeah, culturally, politically and militerally the US is still very powerful. Economically... less so. Actually, I've heard lots of people call the US an empire though personally I don't think it is. Yet at least. Comparisons to the Roman are good. Actually, apparently the US partly modeled itself on Republican Rome... so that fits.
huh? You picked economics as the one area that the US is weak in? Bizarre. Usually that's the one everybody agrees that they dominate. I mean the size of the US economy is still equal to the next 3 largest combined, it's GDP per capita is still 8th in the world and the only countries above it are small countries with tiny populations- it still has a massive lead versus any country with a comparable population size. And what I see as cultural dominance (omnipresent American movies, food, style) I've seen many Europeans try to write off as purely commercial, as if advertising forces everyone to want to watch Hollywood movies, wear Converse hi-tops and drink Starbucks coffee. So.... that's an interesting point of view. :) Certainly the US is not as dominant now as it was in the late 90s after the fall of the Soviet Union. Other powers are rising and the US has started to decline- but I see the decline in all of those areas I mentioned not just economics.
Well yes, the US is in decline. Though it's all relative. I mean, look how long the Romans were in decline. And the US decline may not be terminal. I picked out economics primarily because of US debt. They're in hock to the Chinese and Arabs for err... the technical term is gazillions I believe. They're economy is weak. Big... but weak. As to the US cultural dominance.... a dominance is a dominance regardless of the 'quality' of America's cultural contributions. Still, it's not all late night tv preachers, maccy ds, celebrity gossip and mall-culture. There's the odd The Wire and Nirvana highlight in there every now and then.
eh... I don't think the debt is as big a deal as some make it out to be. Compare the debt as a percentage of GDP for the US versus other countries. Maybe I'll make a quiz. Comparatively speaking the US economy is still very strong but you're right it's all relative.
The date of the beginning of the roman empire bothers me... -27 is a modern convention that refers to the roman political regime rather than to their international politics. They called their territory "imperium romanum" long before Augustus became the first princeps. It's hard to give an appropriate number though... they began to show an imperial behaviour around 150BCE, when they destroyed Carthage, dominated Greece and "pacified" Spain.
Well... if you are referring to the massive land empire founded by Alexander the Great, that one broke up almost immediately following the man's death in his early 30s. The fragments of this empire became several different Hellenistic (Greek-like) kingdoms, some of which lasted centuries. The Parthian and Sassanid Empires, both of which make this list, are considered Persian empires but they were both heavily influenced by Alexander, especially the Parthian Empire where Greek was the official state language. Greek was also a language of administration in the Sassanid Empire though the official language was Middle Persian. The Roman Empire, to a very large extent, was also heavily influenced by Greek culture, and when it split into Eastern and Western halves, the Eastern half, centered around Byzantium (Constantinople) was a Greek-speaking Empire and it lasted 1000 years. Bear in mind Greek as an ethnicity or nationality didn't really exist until the late 1800s.
When you write 'Ethiopia' it answers both the 'Ethiopian Empire' and the 'Aksumite Empire'!! I got 100% anyway but I just wanted to point that out!! Nice Quiz!! 5 Stars!!
Very difficult quiz. My score is 14/35, while i miss three others, i knew. I am not used to complete nor even know less then half of the quiz. Many of the names are really strange - those are really the most commonly used in historiography (i mean the ones such as Srivijaya, Goguryeo and similar)?
How it came, there is nothing like Babylon, Assyria, Mesopotamia, Akkad or Sumer? This region is birthplace of civilization and i hope at least some of them were longstanding.
Those last empires you list were influential (except for Mesopotamia, which is a region, not an empire), but comparatively short-lived.
Gogoryeo was one of the ancient Korean empires. These empires aren't studied very much in the West and if they are they're typically just referred to as Korea. Korean is an acceptable type-in. Srivijaya was one of the many different Indian empires. Again... not studied much in the West. And then usually all crudely lumped together as Indian, as if this was a meaningful identity prior to British colonization.
I'm a bit iffy on the Byzantine issue. After all, the Byzantine Empire was a name coined to separate it from the Roman Empire and legitimise the Holy Roman Empire, while the Emperors of Constantinople always held themselves to be a continuation of Rome. You could say that the Roman Empire lasted for nearly 2,000 years.
Interesting; I didn't know it was coined by Germans so long ago. I was under the impression it was first used by historians much later on that wished to differentiate the Eastern and Western Roman Empires.
Great quiz, but why did you put the end date of the French colonial empire as 1980 (the year the most recent French territory, Vanuatu, gained independence) - there are current French overseas territories that have a higher population than Vanuatu, including Réunion, Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana and New Caledonia. If you consider that you could say the French colonial empire still exists! Also the Dutch colonial empire says to have ended in 1975 (when Suriname gained independence), while the Dutch West Indies still exist.
Given you make the end dates for the Spanish and other Empires the date they lost their last overseas possession, then the British and French and Dutch Empires as still ongoing. What start date would you be using for the British Empire? Because it will have to be included soon enough!
It did not exist for long enough. Once it was unified, Japan was very isolationist until sometime around the Meiji Restoration, which started in 1868. The Empire was very influential, but lasted under a century. There may be some credibility to the notion that a unified Japan is an empire in itself— I've never studied Japanese history extensively so I wouldn't know— but the Tokugawa/Edo Shogunate which did so only got its start in 1600, so that still misses the 400-year cutoff. None of the shogunates that preceded it seemed to reign for 400 years either.
forgot spanish, portuguese and dutch empire. looked at the dates and couldn't for the LIFE of me remember what empires existed in that span of time lol
The Maya were never a united empire, but rather a collection of city states with similar cultures, like ancient Greece. if "China" doesn't count as a single empire, then the Maya definitely do not
How it came, there is nothing like Babylon, Assyria, Mesopotamia, Akkad or Sumer? This region is birthplace of civilization and i hope at least some of them were longstanding.
Gogoryeo was one of the ancient Korean empires. These empires aren't studied very much in the West and if they are they're typically just referred to as Korea. Korean is an acceptable type-in. Srivijaya was one of the many different Indian empires. Again... not studied much in the West. And then usually all crudely lumped together as Indian, as if this was a meaningful identity prior to British colonization.
Xia: 470 years
Shang: 554 years
Eastern Zhou: 515 years