One of these spoilers appears to be uncertain. Wikipedia says: "The question of whether Deckard is intended to be a human or a replicant has been an ongoing controversy since [Blade Runner]'s release."
reading more on the subject I guess you're right. It depends on which version of the film you saw and who you ask, really. Even the screen writer, director, and the actor who played the character don't agree and have changed their opinions over time. I personally prefer the versions of the film that hint more at the protagonist being a replicant I guess because that's the conclusion I had reached myself.
I was also a fan of the 1997 Blade Runner computer game. That game famously had many different endings - some of which made it clear that the character the player was controlling was human, some where he was a replicant, and some where it was left ambiguous. I think I favored the replicant endings in that game, too.
that's the best part of cinema. In movies, Cyprus can be in Asia or in Europe and it is perfectly fine.
I somehow hated the idea of Deckard discovering himself as a replicant, it appears to be a plot twist without extra meaning, Rachel already plays that part. But if it makes more sense to someone, that's fine to me.
I hated Unbreakable and couldn't finish watching Glass, but Split was sort of okay. Probably my 2nd-favorite Shyamalan movie. But for me that's not saying a lot.
However I don't begrudge anyone their enjoyment of anything so if you liked them, that's cool.
I just watched Signs again last night for some reason. Good god that movie is awful... worse than I remember.. maybe because I'm much older than the first time I saw it and more cynical and jaded or maybe I'm just less forgiving of Shyamalan now that I've gotten completely fed up with him. I'd say that it's one of the stupidest things he's done but then the competition for that is pretty stiff. I mean... space aliens capable of interstellar travel some to Earth, a planet whose surface area is over 70% water - the one substance that to them inexplicably disintegrates them, spend a few weeks messing with farmers neatly bending their crops over, and then... their best plan of attack is to land in tiny midwestern towns, naked and unarmed, to attack the redneck inhabitants of some farms? But they're too stupid to figure out how to get through a wooden door.
I also recently rewatched the 6th Sense and it's dumb, too, if you think about it at all. But not nearly as dumb.
and I had completely forgotten about Mel Gibson's character being a lapsed priest in Signs before rewatching it, and the extremely drawn-out, extremely improbable death scene of his wife pinned against a tree with her guts about to fall out, perfectly lucid and able to have a conversation with Mel but for some reason they know as soon as they move the truck she will die instantly.
And how the message of the film or at least the main character's arc was about coming to believe in the offensive nonsense that everything happens for a reason... which he accepts because, while he and the rest of his family stand in the living room passive and motionless, content to watch while one of the aliens tries to gas Mel's young son, the son apparently survives because of his asthma which prevented him from breathing in the alien toxins... so... yeah... obviously god must have given him asthma his whole life because he knew his dad was going to stand and watch while this happened, I guess.
I'd recommend every movie on the quiz except for the 3 Shyamalan movies, and The Others that was kind of dumb, and the first Star Trek film is probably worth skipping, too. Book of Eli is a mixed bag - the cinematography was very pretty but the story was really stupid. I'm also not a fan of Saw but I know it was a popular film and I can see why so if you like the genre, then, go for it...
Of course, if you haven't seen these movies yet and you just finished the quiz, we just spoiled them all for you. :P
Also, pretending that you are crazy is, contrary to popular opinion, not an especially wise way to get out of a murder conviction. Even if you manage to fool everyone, it's not like they just let you go. You're still going to get locked up - you'll just be sent to lock up with a bunch of other crazy people, probably forced to take powerful drugs, and even with good behavior or opportunities for parole you might not be able to get out if you can't convince the staff that you are sane now - not easy to do after you've convinced everyone that you're insane. It could be even worse than just pleading guilty and going to regular prison.
I was also a fan of the 1997 Blade Runner computer game. That game famously had many different endings - some of which made it clear that the character the player was controlling was human, some where he was a replicant, and some where it was left ambiguous. I think I favored the replicant endings in that game, too.
I somehow hated the idea of Deckard discovering himself as a replicant, it appears to be a plot twist without extra meaning, Rachel already plays that part. But if it makes more sense to someone, that's fine to me.
However I don't begrudge anyone their enjoyment of anything so if you liked them, that's cool.
I also recently rewatched the 6th Sense and it's dumb, too, if you think about it at all. But not nearly as dumb.
And how the message of the film or at least the main character's arc was about coming to believe in the offensive nonsense that everything happens for a reason... which he accepts because, while he and the rest of his family stand in the living room passive and motionless, content to watch while one of the aliens tries to gas Mel's young son, the son apparently survives because of his asthma which prevented him from breathing in the alien toxins... so... yeah... obviously god must have given him asthma his whole life because he knew his dad was going to stand and watch while this happened, I guess.
Of course, if you haven't seen these movies yet and you just finished the quiz, we just spoiled them all for you. :P
The fact that the "precious cargo" is a bible is fairly obvious from near the beginning of the movie.
The fact that he's blind is guessable before the reveal (that the book is in Braille), but it isn't completely obvious.