What about Puerto Rico? Receiving millions in aid that the corrupt Puerto Rican government steals? Or how about the warehouses full of aid that was sent after the hurricane but never distributed (video of that just went viral last week). The corrupt mayor claiming they didn't get any help from USA while standing in front of pallets of it. Yes, it's so horrible getting free stuff from the USA without being subject to the same laws or scrutiny. Maybe if Puerto Rico actually became a state their government wouldn't have been able to leave the people without the aid and money that was sent to help. Maybe people should put the blame where it belongs and try to cure themselves of TDS. Why should the USA contribute any more than we did for a territory that doesn't want to be a state?
I'm pretty sure Puerto Rico voted several times to be a state, there is even a bill introduced in the senate towards it. Washington politicans (mostly R) blocking it, not Puerto Ricans.
Also: The debate about help for Puerto Rico after the Hurricane was about scale and sufficiency. If you start looking in the actual complaints and problems, you will see, that the aid dispatched was way to low and the US Government then misled about it, to avoid further tranches.
And also, in case you are not aware of it: The phrase "I saw a viral video" does not increase credibility. In fact, it might just do the opposite.
QRU I appreciate what you're saying and I agree with most of it but viral videos aren't necessarily propaganda. They've been immensely important in drawing light to police brutality here in the US and to show the atrocities of oppressive regimes around the globe.
I agree that it's not *good* proof by any means, but all "viral video" means is that a video got popular (it might also insinuate that "the media" isn't reporting on the specific thing, but that's not a necessity). I just don't think it should be seen as a reason to discredit.
Still pretty good. A lot of people don't even know what stuff like the Vatican City, Monaco, or San Marino are. And definitely not that Newfoundland was a country. Thanks HOI4 for that!
Edit* I now realize Newfoundland was on the other history map quiz.
Xinjiang works as a type-in, and given the recent news coming out of China I'm not surprised that a good percentage of people can at least name that region.
Technically Newfoundland kept dominion status. It didn't have a functioning "responsible" government, though, so it was controlled by Britain from 1934-1949. For instance, Newfoundland didn't declare war during WWII--that automatically happened when Britain declared war (interestingly, the same is true for Canada in WWI, yet Canada's "independence" is usually considered to have started in 1867).
By which you must mean that, really, NO ONE acknowledged the existence of such a 'country' ;)
Long gone are the glory days of Kingdom of Tibet. If the British would have gone ahead with their ambitions of annexing the place like it was the Crimean peninsula, things might have been different. In which way? So many theories to throw around.
Lebanon probably should be on this list. It was independent for the most part when the French Mandate ended in 1943. That's when the international community and the country recognized Lebanese independence. While some soldiers were still present, the French really did not control national policy anymore or maintain control of the country.
Both DPRK and ROK still consider August 15, 1945 as independence day. Although the USSR and USA occupied Korea, the entirety of Korea was independent and sovereign, each portion with its own Korean leader (Rhee and Kim). Neither the US nor USSR would have called Korea a part of it as the British or French empires (for example) would have of their colonies.
They war independent, that is true, but they Were formally part of the Sovjets and the americans. The point is that in that way Canada and many others Shouf be Colonies too
There was no Germany as a whole in 1945. After WWII it was split into 4 parts, controlled by USSR, USA, UK and France. Hence you need to get these four countries in order each part to show up.
For that silver of territory between China and USSR, a few more type ins might help -- I tried various combinations of direction + ethnicity + stan but couldn't get it right.
Indonesia declared independence in 1945 but the Dutch and other western nations, including the US, didn't recognize it until 1949. The British took over from surrendered Japanese troops in 1945 and didn't leave until 1946 when the Dutch arrived to take over. Not sure if Indonesia should be seen as indepedent as the end of 1945 as it was occupied by Japanese, British and Australians and the Dutch took over in urban areas until 1949.
Interesting that Japan is considered sovereign. I would have thought that Douglas MacArthur, as Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, controlled things.
Also I wonder some definitions: how come Japan is considered sovereign but not Germany? Also the sovereignity of Vietnam, Indonesia etc. that time is at least questionable.
East Turkestan, as far as my knowledge, never functioned as a country and was more of a rebellion that was said to be independent though never truly was. It had a few attempts including during 1945. But I don't think it was enough to qualify a place on this quiz. It, in my mind, would be like putting Abkhazia as a country on the world map quiz. Sure they claim independence, but not many nations would actually recognize them.
when I was going through the answers that were correct I was super confused when I saw I got east turkestan. i have no clue what that is but I got it because I wrote the Chinese province of Xinjiang
Also: The debate about help for Puerto Rico after the Hurricane was about scale and sufficiency. If you start looking in the actual complaints and problems, you will see, that the aid dispatched was way to low and the US Government then misled about it, to avoid further tranches.
And also, in case you are not aware of it: The phrase "I saw a viral video" does not increase credibility. In fact, it might just do the opposite.
I agree that it's not *good* proof by any means, but all "viral video" means is that a video got popular (it might also insinuate that "the media" isn't reporting on the specific thing, but that's not a necessity). I just don't think it should be seen as a reason to discredit.
Sorry for being so pedantic :p
Edit* I now realize Newfoundland was on the other history map quiz.
Long gone are the glory days of Kingdom of Tibet. If the British would have gone ahead with their ambitions of annexing the place like it was the Crimean peninsula, things might have been different. In which way? So many theories to throw around.
They invaded after
Kingdom of Tripura
State of Hyderabad
State of Junagadh
Also I wonder some definitions: how come Japan is considered sovereign but not Germany? Also the sovereignity of Vietnam, Indonesia etc. that time is at least questionable.