Yeah agreed about China. I understand not including Hong Kong as a country, but if you are going with Jetpunk's list of countries, then Hong Kong is part of China, meaning that part of China was definitely in the British Empire.
I'll admit I'm not exactly an expert in Bhutanese history, but I don't think Bhutan was ever a full British colony. I did a quick google search, and all it says is that Britain had control of Bhutan's foreign affairs for a while, which I don't think should count. Anybody care to chime in to clear things up for me?
This! History of Bhutan is quite complicated but even if it was a protectorate, it certainly was never part of the British Empire. Bhutan has simply never been invaded, occupied and therefore colonized, by any country. Britain and the crown did not rule nor administrate Bhutan. The case of Bhutan is a bit similar to what happened to China during colonial ages.
The same is true for Nepal! This is what the Britannica says: Nepal and Bhutan remained nominally independent throughout the British period, though both eventually became British protectorates—Nepal in 1815 and Bhutan in 1866. I know, that many Gurkhas (tribe in Nepal) became soldiers for the British
Nepal was always independent, but a section of land was ceded after the Anglo-Nepal War of 1814 and then returned in 1860 in exchange for service of Nepali mercenaries in 1857 mutiny. They'd been recruited as part of the treaty, but Nepal retained its independence throughout. Only one British observer allowed in the country. (FYI Gurkhas are not a tribe, but an ethnic group from the district of Gorkha; Prithvi Narayan Shah, who united Nepal, was from Gorkha. The name ends up getting used rather generically, like "Sherpa," which is also an ethnic group.) Anyhow - it is not accurate to call it a dominion of the British Empire. Relationship was complicated. I believe that's true of Bhutan, too, but am not sure on that point. Anyhow, quizmaster isn't open to discussion, so ke garne (what to do).
It was however a protected state, which was essentially a de facto protectorate as the foreign policies and finances were under British control. So just like Nepal and Bhutan, it's a complicated situation.
I thought I was going crazy! I nearly missed it because of this, Grenada was my last country because I typed St Lucia, St Vincent, and St Kitts all in one streak and knew Grenada was lit up.
This quiz is based in 1921 and the Anglo-Irish treaty was signed on December 6th, and it transitioned to a self governing dominion in 1922, and since there is a caveat including dominions, Ireland still counts even then. Ireland gained full independence in the 30's.
Great quiz, like the others, I think that China should be included on account of Hong Kong, especially where a section of Libya was included in the quiz. My 2c, but otherwise I really enjoyed the quiz.
Everyone's going on about Hong Kong, while I'm wondering why Bhutan was included, but not Nepal. Both countries had a rather weird relationship with the British Empire... so it's always the sources you base your quiz on who dictate whether they should be included, but never did I encounter one where one but not the other was
Nepal was not colonized. A section of Nepal at the border of India was taken by the British in the early 1800s and then given back after Gurkhas were being recruited; but the recruitment of Gurkhas has nothing to do with colonization or British control. British weren't even allowed to live in Nepal, except for one observer in Kathmandu.
No they weren't. The Commonwealth was formed in 1931, which is when the founding members were each recognised as sovereign countries. In 1921, they were all still imperial dominions - fairly autonomous, but part of the empire.
If you like this quiz, there's a funny book called "All the countries we've ever invaded (and the few that we never got round to)" by Stuart Laycock. If the title makes you giggle, give it a read.
Why was parts Turkey included? Out of all my history, I'm blanking on when the U.K. was owning Turkey. Not asking it to be removed, just wondering about the history.
Sorry, but what part of the Empire is there to be proud of? Taking over lands that don't belong to you without the consent of its inhabitants? Pillaging and looting precious historic sites? Causing mass famines? Using torture and violence to put down peaceful protests?
Don't get me wrong--I have nothing against Britain, and if anything I'd consider myself something of an Anglophile. I'm also willing to concede that there were some positives from imperialism, like improvements in education and the adoption of English as a universal language. That doesn't make up for the massive human rights abuses of the Empire though. You can be proud of your country for many reasons, but the Empire should not be one of them.
I agree. Pride in a country is weird anyway. After all many Americans are proud of the USA despite the fact that it was created from genocide of the indigenous population, mass slavery and aggressive wars of conquest against weaker neighbors.
Oh boy...Could we just NOT extol ANY nation prior to 2000? We thought Canada was good until we started finding those schools with um, you get the point.
If Turkey's included because of the immediate post-WW1 military occupation, Germany should also be included given the UK's part in the occupation of the Rhineland.
one time when i was in cancun i saw a british person and he invaded my personal space so please add mexico to the answer list this is such a big mistake.
plss add some sort of dot for the Gambia, had like 2 extra minutes and couldn't find what I got wrong. So, instead I got everything except for the Gambia.
Change My Mind
Republic of Ireland was de facto independent since 1919, and the recognition by the UK came exactly in 1921.
Therefore, I'd suggest to have it taken out (or at least put a "disputed" disclaimer).
Could someone redo this quiz including all territories that were once part of the Empire. Seems a bit unusual to put a date on it.
Don't get me wrong--I have nothing against Britain, and if anything I'd consider myself something of an Anglophile. I'm also willing to concede that there were some positives from imperialism, like improvements in education and the adoption of English as a universal language. That doesn't make up for the massive human rights abuses of the Empire though. You can be proud of your country for many reasons, but the Empire should not be one of them.
(Just a joke btw)
With one miss 5 points are welcomed
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambela_(city)#British_concession_(1902%E2%80%931956)
Yeah I know petty but Canada didn't control the empire, the UK did