You are absolutely right. I started looking up some of the suggestions that people made in the comments. Some I agree with others, no way. Judy Collins appears to be as prominent as Phil Collins, so that should be removed in the edit. But it's hard for me to agree that an American Jazz singer from the 40s is more famous than one of the Beatles, but I'll probably change that one too.
In terms of popularity, I think you've hit the nail on the head. I think Anne Shelton is more well known than Blake Shelton though? I've never heard of Blake. Maybe it's because I'm a Brit, Anne was a 40s sweetheart and Blake is a country singer which is a much more popular genre in the US!
There was a debate somebody who might've been known 75 years ago is as family as one of the Beatles? That's like saying you should accept Harold for a famous politician named Washington.
@BobSaget no, it doesn't depend on what kind of music you listen to. More famous refers to how many people can recognize the individual. If you surveyed 1000 people and asked them which one have the heard of, I would be willing to bet anything on this planet, that more people know and heard of Phil Collins than Bootsy Collins. I didn't even know there was someone in the world named Bootsy.
"More Famous" is a matter of opinion. For example, I consider Pierce The Veil to be more famous than, say Little Mix, because I know more people who know PTV than people who know Little Mix. However, if you did a survey on the street, Little Mix would likely be considered the most famous of the two.
Also, did anybody else try Jeffree Star for Ringo Starr? I figured it was a typo and then I remembered The Beatles xD
I also couldn't get Jeremy Clarkson out of my head for Kelly Clarkson, haha.
Exactly (I think that was what you were trying to say?) Everybody I know knows me! I must be very very famous!! (Even some I dont know knows me, I sometimes find out..go figure)
More famous is definitely NOT an opinion. It is how many people know them, not how many people you know that know them. (Still wouldnt be an opinion then, just less objective and more selective. Like getting 100% recognisability when only asking people that know them)
It would be like saying which person is taller is an opinion.
The difference between height and fame in your analogy is ease of measurement. You can find someone's height with a tape measure and a few seconds, and many famous people have their height listed online, assuming they're not lying. Meanwhile to measure fame you first need to pick a sample of people - if you were to only ask British people then, say, kids TV nightmare Mr Blobby would be as famous as Bruce Springsteen, while if you ask the whole world the entire list above are quite obscure because more than half the population live in East Asia - and then conduct an expensive survey on that population for each person whose fame you want tested. In the absence of this, everyone here is making claims about what the results of such a survey would be based off of their own gut instinct, and given the huge bias we all have towards people in our own countries around our own age with similar interests to ourselves, no one will ever be even vaguely close to correct.
At least half these artists are vocalists rather than musicians; ie. I don't think they could play an instrument or create music without electronic assistance
Please accept Michael for Starr, for the ridiculous people like me who draw a blank on Ringo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Saenz - Michael or Mike Starr was also the bassist for Alice in Chains. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Starr_(musician)
I got just about all the old ones and a few of the new ones I knew just from being in high school. "Little Anthony" and "Dion and the Belmonts...." Oops
Damn. It should accept Billy Horne. Because he is cool, because he plays (and makes) hurdygurdies and because he has a webpage: http://www.billyhorne.com/
I wholeheartedly agree courthousedoc. The trouble, or perhaps the challenge, with quizzes like this is that they are terribly subjective. "More famous" according to whose criteria? I'm a big fan of both Lena and Marilyn Horne because I grew up in a household with parents who appreciated both. But choosing one over the other as more famous depends on whether you like and listen to opera or jazz. I grant you that Lena Horne had greater appeal and reached a bigger audience than Marilyn Horne, but both singers achieved great things in their very distinguished and yet very different careers. So, maybe allow a little leeway, at least with this one answer?
As a French Canadian, I'd love it if you could put the "é" back in "Céline Dion". Not sure if she officially goes by Celine nowadays, but Céline is her birth name.
I know I'm in the minority but when I see 'Morello' I think of Dave Brubeck's drummer, but then 'Joe' was already covered with Satriani. Yeah, I feel like I should have known about Rage but not this time.
Yeah looking back I have no clue how I had not heard of Tim McGraw he's definitely more famous. I was raised (well being raised) on Gavin DeGraw though
One of the two has multiple double platinum albums and is in the rock and roll hall of fame. The other has 2 studio albums and a Wikipedia page. For the moment, I'm good keeping it the way it is. But who knows. That may change in 10 years.
Only an incredibly famous pop singer with an estimated worldwide album sales of 90 million records. She was also one of the coaches on The Voice for years.
Also, did anybody else try Jeffree Star for Ringo Starr? I figured it was a typo and then I remembered The Beatles xD
I also couldn't get Jeremy Clarkson out of my head for Kelly Clarkson, haha.
It would be like saying which person is taller is an opinion.
Maybe add a joint santana or something