What countries are the most "underpopulated" based on how many people they would have to add before their population density was the same as the global average?
It's a quiz about population density. It's purpose is to test the knowledge of the quiztakers. (Just like every quiz on this website) Nobody makes the argument that this should happen in real life.
You’re just getting caught up by the name by taking it too literally. If the quiz were named “Countries that are Farthest Below the World Average for Population Density by Headcount”, then I’m sure you’d be fine with the quiz. Kinda wordy though; this title is better. Also, getting a featured quiz is really cool so don’t get all pedantic on a user quiz! :)
Who is even asking you, is what I want to know. This quiz is a very cool thought exercise, and it's pretty pointless to try to apply it to real life as though the quiz writer were threatening us with this being our reality.
I still don't understand this website's constant exclusion of Greenland as part of Denmark, but also not considering it for its own country either. It means a quite large landmass goes completely disregarded. And its small population would make it all the more important for a quiz like this one
Just wondering, based on these metrics, what would be the "perfect" country for population? Like, what country's population density is closest to the world average?
Countries with a land that it’s climate is not suitable for humans is definitely under populated if it had the same population density as the world average
Obviously it wasnt there.