Well that's where modern civilization came from: Either Europe or Europeans that moved to the New World. Renaissance, Industrial Revolution, combustion engine, electricity, internet, refrigeration, sanitation/separation of food from waste, antibacterial drugs, radiation, modern medicine, space flight, etc.
If Europe never existed, most of the rest of the world would still be living in mud huts.
Now that's just silly. The Renaissance, Industrial Revolution, electricity, etc. have EVERYTHING to do with the prize worthy inventions that came later. Complex technology builds on earlier discoveries. Like minded people from similar philosophies and schools of thought contribute to (and steal from) each other to cause breakthroughs to happen.
Africa, Asia and the Americas all had thriving civilizations with advanced science. Mesoamericans invented the syringe and had powerful painkillers, which they used when performing successful brain surgeries. Indian and Chinese civilization was considered the center of science and technology for millennia before they were conquered. In the Middle East, math, science and literature all made massive strides while Europe sat in Dark Ages. Even in Africa, currently one of the least developed areas of the world, there were thriving civilizations, some so rich in gold that a king crashed economies by spending his gold so lavishly on his pilgrimage to Mecca.
If Europe never exist, rest of the world would have been thriving with wealth. I'm not sure with the whole world but as for my nation India, the British Kingdom stole most of our wealth leaving us in the woods. While we used to live in houses made of gold and silver, they stole it and forced us to live in mud houses.
Though I don't only blame them because there still remains a few questions like how a European nation can conquer such a big and advanced civilization like India, we also had a lot of backstabber and imposters like Mir Nagar among others.
But what I want to say is that if Europe never existed I'm not sure about the rest of the world but we in India wouldn't be still living in mud houses.
SWATkun: India is independent since 1948 if I remember correctly. You seriously want to say that your country is not getting Nobel prize because almost 100 years ago your country was occupied? If you guys would be so smart you'd be getting awards nowadays. With internet the knowledge is at the tips of your fingers for the last 20 years. So stop crying and start thinking and working hard.
1 in 5 Indian people are poor. Think about the people who have had Nobel prizes rich and mainly European. (Mainly). there may be many amazing minds in India but which person would have gone up to them and nominated them for a Nobel prize let alone if their work would even be known. Gandhi got nominated 5 times for a Nobel peace prize but never won. He was assassinated but never received the award even after his death. Sometimes it can also take years for a Nobel prize to be given because of the authenticity of the reward and the reliability of the discovery or creation or achievement. Quite a lot of privilege you wear on your sleeve there.
It's almost as if this was happening because Europeans were colonizing and exploiting other places, and not due to some inherent quality of Europeans...
It says a lot about this site that this comment got as many likes as it did...
What a grossly ignorant and misguided comment that doesn't even try to disguise a white and West supremacist view apologetic of colonialism and imperialism that has devastated the world and enriched Europe over the last 500 years.
The fact it is the most liked comment in the thread is very concerning.
Wait, so the Nobel Prizes should have gone to the marvellous writers/scientists/inventors/economists from Burkina Faso, Mali, Eritrea, Chad, El Salvador, Papua New Guinea, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan etc just so someone would not find them "Eurocentric". Nevermind, you can just create your own Nobel Prizes, with blackjack and hookers as well.
As someone from El Salvador I feel compelled to tell you that we have indeed had great writers that wouldn't have been out of place winning Nobel Prizes in literature.
@wolfcam right, I guess in exams at school, you accused others of being the teachers pet, because they got higher grades than you? Instead of acknowledging that they were just good and or studied hard.
Actually, I would have gotten it anyway because I read about Derek Walcott not too long ago and knew he was from one of the Caribbean island nations, where having just one Nobel laureate would put the per capita number really high.
The nobel prizes seem to skip so many countries with innovative citizens, eg China, Japan, South Korea, many of the Aran states & the Indian subcontinent
Well, it's not that those countries aren't getting Nobel Prizes (check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country; if you click on [show] next to Countries under the Summary section, you get a sortable table), it's just that they have huge populations. So even though the US has more than three times the number of Nobel laureates than the second-place country (the UK), it does not place high on this list because of the large population.
Relevant question for the statistics, does a prize awarded to two people count as one prize or two? Usually one would say they share the prize, but wikipedia counts them separately.
This is false, but whatever. I didn't realize in 2020, people still believe this unfounded lie. All facts need to have references, and those without are flagged as such, or just straight up deleted, even if it's super obvious. They have very strict guidelines, and rules on how it runs, so the chances of false info are no more than usual, and if there is vandalism, it's swiftly removed.
Seriously the most mind-blowing fact remains how many laureates are from Saint Lucia.. ! Guess they didn't change nationality after being awarded the prize, right?
I think this quiz would be more interesting if the Nobel Peace prize was not included. It most often goes to extremely unworthy candidates and is a blight on the Nobel Prize overall. Yes, I know I could make my own quiz but I'm lazy and prefer to whinge, what :P
Wow, super grossed out by the racism in this comment section. Seems like a lot of people have trouble believing that the nobel prizes are skewed at best.
I visited St Lucia {very briefly!} and our guide told us about their Nobel prizes, of which they are very proud. She told us to make sure we remembered the fact, since it was a common question in quizzes!
If Europe never existed, most of the rest of the world would still be living in mud huts.
Though I don't only blame them because there still remains a few questions like how a European nation can conquer such a big and advanced civilization like India, we also had a lot of backstabber and imposters like Mir Nagar among others.
But what I want to say is that if Europe never existed I'm not sure about the rest of the world but we in India wouldn't be still living in mud houses.
It says a lot about this site that this comment got as many likes as it did...
The fact it is the most liked comment in the thread is very concerning.
I guessed everything in Europe, more or less, and then all the tiny and small countries of the world that seemed like they might have a chance.
That said I never would've gotten around to the Caribbean in time if not for the flag picture. :-)