Wow. So Texas is bigger than any non-disputed-as-being-in-Europe countries. (I always learned in school that Russia was in Asia, but I do understand why it's considered part of Europe, both here and elsewhere. And plus Russia's bigger than everything anyway, regardless of what continent it's part of). That's crazy.
The Ural and Caucasus mountains and the Caspian sea are usually used as borders between Europe and Asia, and though most of Russian land is East of the Ural, its capital and most of its population stand in its European part.
Europe and Asia are artificial constructs anyway, none of them fit the definition of a continent.
I have to agree with @AnkitMohan here, why is this website so US-biased, half of the featured quizzes are about United States, and even for those that have nothing to do USA, Quizmaster would comment something totally unrelatable
I'm from Europe and I don't care whether there are more quizzes on the US, Europe or any other area of the world as long as there are many of them and something for everyone. And there is! I just did a quiz on the 100 most populous cities in Germany and learned that a place called "Marl" is one of them, which I had never heard of before - speaking of obscure topics! So as long as the Quizmaster doesn't start deleting niche topic quizzes, as long as they meet quality standards of course, I really see no problem here.
Seeing as documentaries and the news seem to always be comparing areas of the world to the size of Wales or Texas, my dad and I worked out that 1 Texas is equal to 33.5 Waleses...
Our news doesn't use Rhode Islands or Vatican Cities, they must be imperial measurements.
The other metric measurements we use on this side of the water are Belgiums (22.8 per Texas), Yorkshires (58.4 p/T) and Lancashires (226 p/T), but don't tell anyone from Yorkshire about that last one
The Australian state of Western Australia is 4.3 times the size of Ukraine and 3.8 times the size of Texas. It is equivalent to a 127.32 Wales', 841.48 Rhode Islands, and 6,012,761.36 Vatican City's. It also has a population density of a mere 1.02 persons per square kilometre, making it less than Mongolia as the least densely populated country, at 1.97 persons per square kilometre. If it was a country it would be the 10th largest in the world, just after Kazakhstan in 9th and knocking Algeria down to 11th.
The Australian states of Western Australia, Queensland, South Australia and New South Wales, plus the Northern Territory would all beat out the second-placed country on this list (and Texas for that matter).
I don't think I've ever seen such high scores. Average score of 10, with the most missed answers still gussed by 97% of test takers. I hope this become a trend of largest/smallest countries on each continent.
Because some people refuse to accept the European part of Russia. Though the size should give it away. And what's quite interesting is that even though it's just the area on the European side it's still bigger than the other countries combined!
I think a bigger part is not refusing to accept it, but just not knowing it, or even have been taught in school that it didnt belong to europe.
I think peoples eagerness on this site to get points is bigger than their stubbornness in refusing to typer certain answers. Though it might be close ;)
Hi there. I didn't approve the resubmit because it's not consistent with the rest of our quizzes. It doesn't seem like Svalbard is incorporated with the rest of Norway, so it would be somewhat similar to how we don't include Greenland in the area of Denmark. Obviously, this is somewhat up for interpretation, but I think it's best to go with Wikipedia's information unless there is a definite reason not to.
You said that Greenland wasn't included as part of Denmark because it isn't in Europe. Fair enough. But then you should count Svalbard and Bear Island (and possibly Jan Mayen) as part of the area of Norway because they ARE in Europe.
The area of some countries might have been defined a little bit after the quiz was done, and I think that the person who made the quiz just didn't feel like editing the quiz.
Italy is classified as a subcontinent, being recognized as one by many prestigious organizations, e.t. UN, NATO, AU. I guess it is possible to assume Italy being part of the larger continent, but its classification in the scientific world speaks volumes regarding to the economic independence of a land locked country of its sort.
wth are you talkin about? Italy is not land locked, it's a peninsula that's almost all coastline. and I never heard of anyone referring to it as a subcontinent, either.
I'd love some explanation of what was going on there.
Subcontinental landlocked country? Italy is repeated twice, so that's probably not a typo.
Are there any single-country subcontinents? Russia would be closest of course, but I can't find any reference to it or any part of it as a subcontinent. Maybe Central Asia could be described as a landlocked subcontinent?
The UN, NATO and African Union (?) don't recognise subcontinents. Who are the scientists? What are the volumes that are spoken?
If the term 'continent' is vague and up to wildly different interpretations, 'subcontinent' is even more so. The Indian Subcontinent is the only widely recognised subcontinent, though the term South Asia is usually preferred by international organisations, so as not to offend the likes of Pakistan. India gains that status largely because it is a large landmass, with a clear geographic boundary (the Himalayas) and occupies its own tectonic plate. Italy is mostly on the Eurasian Plate, though some is on the Adriatic or Apulian Plate and some is on the African Plate. The Alps do mark a clear boundary, so based on all this I could kinda see where the post was coming from (though didn't agree), until they pulled out landlocked. That just left me completely confused.
Really? On maps the Nordics look waaaaay bigger than Romania and Belarus, thanks to the Mercator projection's quirks. I've got Google Maps open in another tab, and on it Belarus and Romania look like they'd both comfortably fit into southern Finland. Or are you taking that into account and mentally over-correcting for the warping of the Nordics' sizes?
I don’t know why but I was convinced UK should be on this list. I thought I misspelled it so I put UK, United Kingdom, Great Britain, before realizing it wasn’t on here :)
Yeah, I always convince myself that the UK is larger than it actually is -- but at one time the British Empire was 24% of the Earth's total land area! Fun fact: the British Isles are nearly exactly the same size of the state of New Mexico -- 315,159 km² and 315,194 km² respectively.
This really goes to show how massive the Soviet Union was. Firstly, three quarters of its territory was in Asia. Secondly, the remaining quarter that was in Europe got broken up. Yet, here the two largest countries in Europe are both remnants of that quarter of the Soviet Union.
Love and hugs
Aren't we doing a european quiz
from where did texas and alaska come in your comments?
Europe and Asia are artificial constructs anyway, none of them fit the definition of a continent.
The other metric measurements we use on this side of the water are Belgiums (22.8 per Texas), Yorkshires (58.4 p/T) and Lancashires (226 p/T), but don't tell anyone from Yorkshire about that last one
Runner ups are Damascus with 3,213 history, and Basra with 3,197 history.
*Facepalm
I mean, Greenland is quite large...
Greenland would be number 2 on this list alone......
So Denmark, in turn would be number 2, right?
I think peoples eagerness on this site to get points is bigger than their stubbornness in refusing to typer certain answers. Though it might be close ;)
But it was a great quiz!
get into an argument about a EUROPEAN quiz, pray tell?
I should have thought of Greenland...
Thanks Quizmaster!
Yours,
The UK
Subcontinental landlocked country? Italy is repeated twice, so that's probably not a typo.
Are there any single-country subcontinents? Russia would be closest of course, but I can't find any reference to it or any part of it as a subcontinent. Maybe Central Asia could be described as a landlocked subcontinent?
The UN, NATO and African Union (?) don't recognise subcontinents. Who are the scientists? What are the volumes that are spoken?
Italy?! I'm confused and intrigued...
The Danes must fend for themselves re. Greenland (that they stole from us!).
#1 => 3,960,000
#2-#9 => 603,500+551,500+505,992+450,295+357,168+338,145+323,802+312,685+301,336=3,744,423