Here's the highest medals-per-capita quiz, showing (out of the countries in this quiz) New Zealand ranks number one. If we had as many people as the US of A, we would have got 285 golds, 642 silvers and 357 bronzes (worked out by dividing the US population by NZ's population). Since there were roughly 307 of each medal to be won, this would be impossible, something Kiwis manage as a matter of routine. Everyone, would you please now rise.
I was surprised how often I saw Kazakhstan in the finals of various events. I didn't realize that they produced strong athletes. I guess when your only knowledge of the country is Borat, I suppose things may be a bit skewed against reality.
Well they were one of two countries to bid to host the 2022 olympics, (they other being the winner, China. Therefore it can be observed perhaps Kazakhstan takes the olympics more seriously than many other countries.
They take it more seriously because they bid to host the Winter Olympics? Woudln't that be an argument for every country that ever bid to be a host? And wanting to host takes more than want. After all it is a huge money decision.
If I recall correctly, I think Kazakhstan (and Azerbaijan & Uzbekistan) have a pretty good group of athletes when it comes to weightlifting, boxing, and wrestling, and other such sports.
The ex-USSR countries have maintained the strong sport organizations they inherited when the USSR broke up. And they tend to emphasize individual oriented sports which don't require a great deal of equipment and facilities (e.g. boxing, weightlifting, etc)
Yeah, it would. In India with 1.2 billion people, there is a lot of competition with education; many colleges only accept students with 95% or above. People nowadays are shifting towards a mentality that education can only get you further in life, which is very true in a sense, but Indian parents are enforcing that on children from a very young age, keeping them slightly away from sports, games etc. There is not a complete stop, but India is an agricultural country, and it is very good to see their progress in not only agriculture, but technology, science, commerce, arts etc. Just sports is getting a little less support from Indians, except cricket, hockey, squash and table tennis, of course! The living standard is getting higher and higher. But now India is getting modernized, so in the future, there will hopefully be a rise in Olympic success by Indians. Every country has it's good and bad points. For India, it's Bollywood, but also pollution. There's technology, but not sports.
As well as some points mentioned, In India there is a lack of facilities for most sports and where facilities exist the general public is unable to meet the costs involved. In USA, Australia, Europe just to mention three areas, there are Swimming Pools in just about every town, Gymnasiums in every town, Football grounds, tennis courts, boxing gyms, golf rinks, sports stadiums, velodromes etc. etc............ It is also financially possible, in those areas mentioned, for just about all young people to take part in any sport they fancy....... All schools have coaching and sporting facilities ...... and there are indoor facilities within easy distance if the weather is against outside practice... If those conditions applied to India it would not be long before their population would begin to raise their standing in world sports.
Just as rugby had to go to their 7s code to make it work for the Olympics (traditional 15s tournament couldn't be done in 16 days), cricket could promote 20/20. I'm not advocating that since 20/20 seems to be little more than a batting contest/home run derby, but it's probably the only way that it happens.
Well let's make cricket more than 1 or 2 events then. The bloody swimmers get a squillion medals - swim 100m, 200m, 400m, 800m, 1500m, swim this way, that way, any way and before you know it the medal table is swimming with swimmers. Cricket: 20-overs-a-side, then 18-overs, 16-overs, 14-overs-a-side, one or 2-handed bat holding, mens & womens, left or right handed bowling, 3-stump, 1-stump, 5-stump, with umpires or without them.. that'll get the medal numbers up
Unfortunately the cricket world is incredibly corrupt, and India itself has kinda ruined the chances of cricket becoming an Olympic sport and gaining popularity in other countries. If you've heard of Hasan Minhaj and his (now cancelled) show "Patriot Act," he talked about it once. It's kinda a long video, but if you are well and truly interested in learning more (and are okay with swearing), it's worth the watch.
The US is not that impressive considering the population size. Compared to New Zealand and Denmark, the US should have won 1190 and 885 medals respectively, to have won as many per capita.
I'm sure they do aim high, but a lot of the summer sports are events in which the USA has been building an infrastructure for decades. That's a lot of ground to make up. Swimming and gymnastics, for example, are events in which the U.S. is usually challenged only by Australia (swimming) and Russia or China (gymnastics). Once in a while, a country finds a generational athlete to challenge, but more often than not, it's about the country's support system for a given sport. The US did especially well this time around because so many Russian challengers were disqualified.
For GB, their success is in part due to the legacy of the London games. Canada had the same boost in Sochi from hosting the winter games, four years prior.
The US has a superb organizational structure in the NCAA. Canadian and Caribbean athletes especially leech off this structure for the support they wouldn't receive at home.
The UK National Lottery money has made the biggest difference to the British team. Following the humiliation in Atlanta, where we were the poorest performing English speaking nation, in gold medal terms, things had to change. Sports which receive big tranches of lottery money, but fail to produce results at major championships are now punished mercilessly with funding cuts. Athletes and coaches have had to raise their game and the improvements in a number of sports has been startling.
Also, population matters. The US quite simply has a much bigger pool of talent to draw from, which is why our team is almost always the largest at the Olympics. That's also probably a major factor behind China's increasing success at the Olympics as well in recent years.
This is crazy to see that 75 years after WWII the dominant nations at the Olympics are still the five "winners" (and permanent members of the UN Security Council) and the two "losers" (Germany and Japan).
The US has a superb organizational structure in the NCAA. Canadian and Caribbean athletes especially leech off this structure for the support they wouldn't receive at home.