It's too early for them to really be considered a generation. Many haven't even been born yet. And I'm sure the name will coalesce on something other than "Gen Z". That is, unless the zombie apocalypse happens during their coming of age.
I disagree, it isn't too early at all. Most researchers place the starting birth year for the generation following the Millenials as early as the late 90s to the early 2000s. So no matter what starting year you choose, 12-20ish years have passed since that generation started, meaning nearly all of the members of that generation have been born. Some researchers have already identified the post-Gen Z cohort. They're calling it Generation Alpha and have identified the birth year as early as 2010.
Quizmaster, I'm not quite sure what you mean by many haven't been born yet. Gen Z stopped being born in 2010, and the newest generation is Generation Alpha. Also, your source isn't incredibly accurate. The divide between Millennials and Gen Zers is remembering 9/11, and most say Millennials stopped being born at around 1996. And Gen Z isn't really a generation yet? I think not. Adults from the generation have developed distinct characteristics from the other generations when they were the same age, and many sources suggest they are becoming much like Baby Boomers in work ethic.
Both the use of "Gen Z" and the cultural narratives around this generation have become more prominent in the years since this was posted. Perhaps now would be a good time to update the quiz.
I don’t know what term(s) researchers or academics are using, but whenever I hear people my age (late 30s) or younger talk about the generation after Millennials the term is always Zoomer.
The people born on the cusps of two generations often don't fit into the norms of either generation and make their own subgroup of a generation. The people at the end of Gen X and the beginning of Millennials are sometimes called the Oregon Trail Generation....I was born in 1985 and feel I fit in that group a little better than Millennials, but I'm too young to be a Gen Xer.
Love this term! This would be my parent’s generation. They’re technically Boomers but a lot of typical Boomer traits, memories, and behaviors are sooo not like them!
Evilpenguin ~ I think in that case you can pretty much self-assess. My husband was also born in '64 and wore long hair and tie-dye and listened to a lot of 70s prog rock. I, on the other hand, born in '66, was all about Depeche Mode, big perms, leg warmers, and irony. We're a cross-generational marriage? :-)
My Dad was born in late 60’s and Depeche Mode is his favourite band and he had a poster of Tracey Ullman on his wall and is still a big fan today as am I.
You are actually exactly who "Generation X" referred to when it was first coined. It was not referring to the children of baby boomers, but to the baby bust generation between the boomers and when the boomers had their kids.
Douglas Coupland in his book Generation X calls these kids (the children of baby boomers) "Global Teens", which, of course, sucks as a name. Because "Generation X" was such a catchy name, and no good name ever caught on for the "Baby Boom Echo" kids, the meaning got smeared and diluted until now the term covers the whole thing.
I'm a children of baby boomers born in the early '70s but was married to someone born in the mid-sixties and we really were two different generations, with not much overlap in our cultural touchstones. That person was definitely Generation X, and I was not; but since then I've just accepted that people call us Gen-Xers now. It's better than being called a boomer, which has become a kind of sloppy catch-all synonym for "old".
My brother was born in 1943 and I can tell you for certain, he and his friends were anything but "silent". I had to look it up to see why they were called that. Wikipedia calls the Greatest Generation the "G.I. Generation", and they also added Generation Z after Millenials. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation#List_of_generations
According to Strauss & Howe's generational theory, the last year of the Silents was 1942 & the Boomers (not Baby Boomers, just Boomers) started in 1943. They also end the Boomer generation in 1960 rather than 1964. I'm of the '63 cohort & identify more w/Gen X (or as S&H call us, the 13ers) than Boomers, but I'd definitely consider myself to be at the tail end of Generation Jones as well.
It's also called the GI Generation, because during WWII, men in the US Army were referred to as GIs. Supposedly GI stands for government issue, although I've heard that that's been debunked.
We, Gen X, the kids of the Me/Boomers were told to go outside and play. We got a key for the front door to come home after school at 3:00 because nobody would be home when we got there - both parents working and we were largely only children. Our parents were incredibly self-focused. Us? We thrived during pandemic lockdowns because we had so much practice entertaining ourselves 30-40 years ago. Pretty sure Gen X is the opposite of the 'Me' Generation in the context it is usually meant.
The "Silent Generation" included such people as Elvis Presley, The Beatles, James Dean and Muhammad Ali. In terms of popular culture, it arguably had more influence than any of the succeeding generations.
No one from it was elected to the White House though (Carter and Bush Sr. were born just before and Clinton, Bush Sr. and Trump were born just after) so maybe that's part of the reason for the name.
"At a time when most fighters let their managers do the talking, Ali thrived in and indeed craved the spotlight, where he was often provocative and outlandish."
Generations are divided generally by certain qualities that other generations don't have at that age. These qualities are often not passed on due to certain events such as war or 9/111.
“IGen” is another name for “Generation Z”. Google the term and see. There have been books and articles written using that term.
Also, as a member of Generation X that we are not the Me Generation. We are the farthest thing from it. I don’t know who is the Me Generation. It could be the Boomers OR the Millenials as far as I’m concerned. Both those generations seem to think they are the center of the universe.
Baby boomers are the one and the only original "Me Generation". The whole name became fashionable long before the Millennials would be born (early to mid 1970s).
A recent study at the very beginning of the covid circus (very late 2019) found that the baby boomers are not only the most narcissistic generation alive, but also the most hyper-sensitive a.k.a. "Snowflakes". (Which surprised many)
However... multiple studies find that the society as a whole continues to grow in favoring & rewarding narcissistic traits (very roughly: self-absorbed indulgence of the 1970s -> selfish, greedy YUPpie 1980s -> global audience via the internet 1990s -> social media 2000s -> etc).
All that said, the topic is highly debated and there is no definitive answer. Even more importantly, not all individuals of one generation fit the description of "their" generation, which should be obvious... but we love to stereotype.
Might be me but I dont think I ve heard of millenials until relatively recently ( not before 1990) And I never (would) have thought that people that were adults (18+) at 2000 at 2000 were considered millenials.... Techinically I fit in the group, but always thought it was the group that came several years behind me.
I would ve thought people born from about 1990 and up were milenials. The kids that grew up with computers and internet and dont know and remember a time before it. (or even when there were no smartphones but at least dont remember there not being mobile phones) The ones that were still teens in the year 2000.
I find it really weird to call someone that is 39 a millenial... in my mind someone that is 19 is a millenial.. (and instinctively I actually expect info to back that up, but good chance I wont find it, because no one else commented about it...so I guess I ve had the wrong idea all this time)
It depends on definition, but most definitions would not call people born in 1980 millennials. Most start the generation a few years later, between 1981 and 1985. Many define 2000-borns as millennials, but not all. The end year for millennials is anywhere between 1994/95 and 2004.
The most restrictive definition is 1982-1994 (I think), whereas the longest is 1982-2004, which is also the original definition created by the people who coined the term millennials, Neil Howe and William Strauss. It's also the definition I personally agree with the most.
Many people born in the early 1980's consider themselves a cross between Gen X and millenials due to being born when everything was changing. Sometimes the term "Xennials" comes up as a supposed microgeneration.
I agree - I think the consensus starting year for Gen Y/Millenials ought to be between 1985-1990. Gen X got shortchanged on so much - a traditional 'generation' used to be 20 years, so of course ours gets cut to 15. Don't even get me started on Social Security LOL
In response to one of your earlier comments, Quizmaster, and also as a proud member of Gen Z, I can tell you that we very much adopted that name and it's unlikely that it will change in the future. Furthermore since Gen Z now officially starts around 1996 and many of us are teens or young adults I think it is time to include this generation in the quiz. (I'd even assume that the latest babies born will be counted into an even younger generation in the future.)
Born in 1969. I have excellent recall from a very, very young age and I've had an odd sense all my life. I've felt like I've spent my entire life entering a vacuum. Every 'trend' of life - going to college, starting a family, the kind of car to buy, etc - I've always been slightly late to the party. Like arriving to a party just as the guests have begun to leave. It's been uncanny. I've always felt more synchronized with Gen Y - I personally feel like Gen X ought to extend from 1965 through 1985 at least or maybe even as far as 1990. More shared experiences as a cohort, at least as it seems from my perspective.
Problem is, different websites will be different answers for generations. Not only birth year but also the generation names. I was born i 1984 and according to most sites, I fall under the cusp of Generation Y and MIllenial
My daughter, 1998, identifies as a millennial and perceives a difference between her and those a few years younger viewing them as far more tech reliant or addicted. She and her group of friends refer to those younger as iGens -- as social media and tech in general is far more prevelant with those younger. The iGen term appears to be replacing Gen Z. Using letters is fairly simplistic, Gen X stems from a book which perfectly described a generation left alone with no direction and treated as an after thought (ie me). To continue with Y and Z misses the point -- it doesn't describe anything.
After thinking about it a little more, if any generation is going to be iGen, it'll be the current one: alpha.
I was born in the very late 90s and sure social media was a thing when I was a kid and most kids had cellphones by middle school, but I'm not sure that's enough of a paradigm shift to demarcate generations. However, what does appear to be serious enough is the "kid raised by an iPad" trope that's started in the last 7 or 8 years. That's just so fundamentally different from how I was raised, and it seems to be pervasive. Toss on a fully-matured influencer culture and endless content psychologically engineered to be hyper-addictive and that seems a lot closer to an iGen than a bunch of kids whose social media exposure was posting "cheese tastes really good" to Facebook and watching a few videos on YouTube during computer time at school.
Go Gen Z!
I'm Generation On The Fence.
Douglas Coupland in his book Generation X calls these kids (the children of baby boomers) "Global Teens", which, of course, sucks as a name. Because "Generation X" was such a catchy name, and no good name ever caught on for the "Baby Boom Echo" kids, the meaning got smeared and diluted until now the term covers the whole thing.
I'm a children of baby boomers born in the early '70s but was married to someone born in the mid-sixties and we really were two different generations, with not much overlap in our cultural touchstones. That person was definitely Generation X, and I was not; but since then I've just accepted that people call us Gen-Xers now. It's better than being called a boomer, which has become a kind of sloppy catch-all synonym for "old".
"JetPunk Generation" -)
No one from it was elected to the White House though (Carter and Bush Sr. were born just before and Clinton, Bush Sr. and Trump were born just after) so maybe that's part of the reason for the name.
"At a time when most fighters let their managers do the talking, Ali thrived in and indeed craved the spotlight, where he was often provocative and outlandish."
"Oscar the Grouch was such a ray of sunshine!"
"...is this comment sarcasm? And I quote from the Sesame Street Wiki..."
Greatest Generation = 23 years; The Baby Boomers = 18 years;
Generation X = 15 years, and The Millenials = 20 years. What gives?
Also, as a member of Generation X that we are not the Me Generation. We are the farthest thing from it. I don’t know who is the Me Generation. It could be the Boomers OR the Millenials as far as I’m concerned. Both those generations seem to think they are the center of the universe.
A recent study at the very beginning of the covid circus (very late 2019) found that the baby boomers are not only the most narcissistic generation alive, but also the most hyper-sensitive a.k.a. "Snowflakes". (Which surprised many)
However... multiple studies find that the society as a whole continues to grow in favoring & rewarding narcissistic traits (very roughly: self-absorbed indulgence of the 1970s -> selfish, greedy YUPpie 1980s -> global audience via the internet 1990s -> social media 2000s -> etc).
All that said, the topic is highly debated and there is no definitive answer. Even more importantly, not all individuals of one generation fit the description of "their" generation, which should be obvious... but we love to stereotype.
I would ve thought people born from about 1990 and up were milenials. The kids that grew up with computers and internet and dont know and remember a time before it. (or even when there were no smartphones but at least dont remember there not being mobile phones) The ones that were still teens in the year 2000.
I find it really weird to call someone that is 39 a millenial... in my mind someone that is 19 is a millenial.. (and instinctively I actually expect info to back that up, but good chance I wont find it, because no one else commented about it...so I guess I ve had the wrong idea all this time)
The most restrictive definition is 1982-1994 (I think), whereas the longest is 1982-2004, which is also the original definition created by the people who coined the term millennials, Neil Howe and William Strauss. It's also the definition I personally agree with the most.
I was born in the very late 90s and sure social media was a thing when I was a kid and most kids had cellphones by middle school, but I'm not sure that's enough of a paradigm shift to demarcate generations. However, what does appear to be serious enough is the "kid raised by an iPad" trope that's started in the last 7 or 8 years. That's just so fundamentally different from how I was raised, and it seems to be pervasive. Toss on a fully-matured influencer culture and endless content psychologically engineered to be hyper-addictive and that seems a lot closer to an iGen than a bunch of kids whose social media exposure was posting "cheese tastes really good" to Facebook and watching a few videos on YouTube during computer time at school.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xennials
For example here in Finland we talk about "big year classes", which is pretty similar to "baby boomers" but limited to people born 1945-1950.