The traditional Chinese regions along the Yellow and Yangtze rivers are also very densely populated. But the modern China has brought that down by annexing sparsely populated Tibet, Xinxiang, Manchuria and Inner Mongolia.
Why do you say "modern China"? Those regions have been a core part of China for hundreds of years. They weren't annexed, they were liberated from Japanese occupiers or feudal slaveowners.
Tibet - was never part of China until 1959 -- it was a vassal state of the Manchu empire - but the Manchus were Jurchen people who conquered the Chinese, they weren't Chinese.
Xinjiang - again, a vassal state, but one dating from the Ming dynasty. Never a part of China proper.
Manchuria - land of the Jurchens, they conquered China. Not part of China proper
Inner Mongolia - part of Mongolia conquered by the Jurchens.
I doubt the Uyghur people of Xinjiang see themselves as liberated by the Chinese when half of them are being rounded up and thrown in "Reeducation Camps". Probably the Tibetans share similar sentiments.
Have you ever been to Tibet and Xinjiang? Have you even met a Uyghur person? I know it is an American website and it is politically right to defame China, but I am just sad to see so many users on this website like you got brainwashed by western media so deeply.
You don’t really need to go there when you can just watch videos from people going to see “how great China is” and see tenders watching them through windows.
Indonesia is even more interesting. Java is absolutely packed with nearly 150 million people, and if it were its own country it would have a higher population density than Bangladesh. However, islands like Borneo and New Guinea are pretty large and sparsely populated, so that brings Indonesia's average population density waaay down.
The rhetoric CCP shills use to defend the annexing of Tibet is always hilarious because it directly mirrors the language and reasoning European colonial powers used as justification for their subjugation of foreign peoples. "We saved these downtrodden and suffering people. Destroying their culture is helping them"
Excuse me? They have not ever been a part of 'traditional China'. Han China is traditional China, and that does not include Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, or Tibet. All of these were more recent acquisitions and have always been composed of non-chinese ethnicities. That's like saying India is british because it was traditionally part of the british empire for hundreds of years.
Regions you have mentioned indeed have been a part of China for centuries. Go learn Chinese history first or you can check the Chinese map of Tang Dynasty or Qin Dynasty whatever you name it.
The traditional USA regions along the Mississippi river are also very densely populated. But the modern USA has brought that down by annexing New Mexico, Alaska, Florida, Hawaii and California. Oh I forgot traditional USA does not even exist...
Most of the places you mentioned were either purchased, (including the Mississippi River) or ceded by other countries as a result of wars. New Mexico and California, Mexican Cession/Texas annexation, Alaska was purchased from the Russians, Florida was a Spanish cession, and Hawaii was the only territory we unjustly annexed.
Yes, pretty mind-boggling. I've been there just once and travelled mostly by train, and couldn't believe how, wherever we went, town or countryside, there were people, people everywhere. And it's a big area as well.
"State of Palestine, a modern de jure sovereign state in the Middle East recognized by 136 UN members and with non-member observer state status in the United Nations"
It IS a soveirgn state. The fact that the UK established it, splitting it terribly with Israel, and then went on to not recognize it is absolutely idiotic. Palestine and Israel are both countries, or at the least, should be treated as such despite limited recognition.
Palestine is more of a country than Kosovo because more countries recognize it, but Jetpunk considers Kosovo a country and Palestine not one. Maybe it should rethink.
Are you facepalming at the fact its insanely high density and population are a poor way to go, due to the fact it will suffer severely from overcrowding, climate change and lack of resources
…
or are you just facepalming at the fact you missed it?
I think I've said this before on this site, but I don't think population density is the best measure of overpopulation. Bangladesh is way more self-sufficient in food production (and other economic factors) than very sparsely populated countries like Niger and the DRC, and has attained a pretty sustainable birth rate. Plus, there are plenty of rich countries that have high population densities, like the Netherlands and Germany. Most of the countries on this list already have strong agricultural systems in place, which is ultimately a boon to development, unlike places like the Sahel and Congo Rainforest where agriculture is difficult.
The 7th largest country in the world still makes the list... Above Qatar, Kuwait and Brunei, Japan and Sri Lanka. Absolutely wild. I mean.. I knew that the density is about the same as Israel or the Netherlands... But I kind of still can't wrap my head around it. Especially since India has deserts in the West, parts of the Himalaya in the North and sparsely populated areas in the Northeast. This country is just wild.
The 7th largest country in the world still makes the list... Above Qatar, Kuwait and Brunei, Japan and Sri Lanka. Absolutely wild. I mean.. I knew that the density is about the same as Israel or the Netherlands... But I kind of still can't wrap my head around it. Especially since India has deserts in the West, parts of the Himalaya in the North and sparsely populated areas in the Northeast. This country is just wild.
Xinjiang - again, a vassal state, but one dating from the Ming dynasty. Never a part of China proper.
Manchuria - land of the Jurchens, they conquered China. Not part of China proper
Inner Mongolia - part of Mongolia conquered by the Jurchens.
Manchuria - land of the Jurchens
Mongolia - was part of the Jurchen Manchu empire, not part of China proper
XInjiang - now this dates earlier to the Ming dynasty and was a vassalized khanate, but not part of China proper
Gaza Strip: 5,046
…
or are you just facepalming at the fact you missed it?