Haven't actually done this quiz. Just had to say that of all the subjects to do a quiz about - what a horrible subject to choose. Hardly fun entertainment.
Well, yeah...with that attitude. Learning something new is always entertaining, and I was surprised by some of the answers to this quiz. Now I will go do some research to find out why. Bringing attention to these problems may lead to some answers. I'm not saying Jetpunk is single-handedly going to stop any wars, but you shouldn't doubt the power of the Quizmaster! ;)
Not everything has to be positive, we're just testing our knowkedge. However, I agree that using the ISIS symbol on the thumbnail is kind of crossing a line.
Looking at the numbers, I wonder if there has ever been, in recorded history, a three-year span with so few conflict deaths. There is a good chance that we are living in the most peaceful epoch in all of human history. (Knocks on wood).
God, you would never think that given our constant bombardment with bad news. Every time I hear that crime is at an all time low in the United States I immediately think "that's not possible."
Reports of conflict and crime are at all-time highs - we simply have more access to information than ever in history. So, there is an observational bias that makes it seem worse than ever.
It's not just access to information but also the multiplication of information sources and the arrival of the 24-hour news cycle and clickbait media. But there have always been doomsayers claiming that the time in which they lived was the worst ever and the end was near... this goes back to prehistory.
Haven't actually read the newspaper or watched the TV news. Just had to say that of all the subjects to do a world news story about - what a horrible subject to choose. Hardly fun entertainment.
Well, who said a quiz has to be fun? If anything, it's informative. I had no clue Mexico was ranked 2nd on the list. I would've thought it'd be a war-torn country. So I learned something new.
I find this very interesting, but I would also suggest that quiztakers consider that these numbers likely do not tell the entire story. We can only be as accurate as the Wikipedia-aggregated data is, and it's quite likely that there are a lot of unreported conflict deaths- first thoughts go to Mali, Myanmar, China, Philippines, and the like.
I am not sure how they derive the Mexico numbers. Even though it's a horrible situation, I wouldn't consider them deaths due to conflict. There is no active international or armed civil insurrection between avowed political entities looking to destroy/support regimes. I think it would be better more correct to call the the deaths criminal.
The inclusion of Mexico seems odd to me, too. Corrode has a point; the violence there between the drug cartels and the government is on a whole different level than most places. Even when the FBI went to war against the KKK and the Mafia it didn't really compare. But... it's still in my mind not the same thing as a civil war. These aren't separatists or invaders or sectarian factions attempting to overthrow the government. They are criminals. Extremely powerful well-armed criminals that the government in Mexico may not be competent enough to deal with effectively, but criminals nonetheless. Do they count shoot outs between drug dealers and cops as conflict deaths in other countries?
Besides the reasons offered by Kalbahamut - from a logical and financial standpoint, when has building a wall ever been a permanent solution to any problem in history: The Great Wall, Hadrian's Wall, walled cities, Atlantic Wall, Maginot Line or the Berlin Wall (which became nothing more than a symbol for oppression and hate)? Ultimately none of them achieved the desired outcome. Is there a wall cycle where someone makes the same mistake of thinking it will be a cure all every century or so? I'm sincerely asking a group of intelligent people is the wall a good idea or is it treating a symptom and not the cause?
There have been walls in history that served a purpose effectively. But if the one that Trump talked about building on the border was supposed to be to stop an invasion by Mexican drug cartels that's a $70 billion solution to a problem that doesn't exist that wouldn't work anyway.
I usually agree with alot that Kalbahamut says, but what other countries have a wide open border through mostly desert and open land that is so vulnerable to allowing drugs and criminals come unimpeded into the country? Also without a wall, better border patrol, and stronger laws against illegal immigration, how long before that conflict spills into our country from Mexico. don't judge and make ignorant statements unless you know the actual facts.
um. Russia, China, Mongolia, Mali, Algeria, Mauritania, Mexico, Chad, Niger, Nigeria, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Canada.... etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.. should I go on? Because building a thousand-mile long concrete wall to stop drug trafficking which mostly takes place at legal border checkpoints and immigration which mostly takes place legally at airports is a ridiculous child's solution?
And despite the huge size, the US-Mexican border is one of the most diligently patrolled in the world. Though, when asked what would make their jobs easier, border patrol agents list things like drones, cameras, and personnel above walls that would be significantly more expensive and less effective. I agree, don't make ignorant statements unless you know the actual facts.
1) People aren't flooding the border to get into Russia, China, Mongolia, Mali, ect...I know you were just answering his question, but answering it within the context of similar situations would've been more pertinent.
2) I think Trump suggested the wall where there aren't natural barriers. Many of the places you listed have several.
Walls have worked/not worked throughout history. There are countless examples on both sides. The fact is one side in American politics encourages illegal immigration while another does not. If you agree with immigrants being in America illegally, that is your opinion. In fact, it's not even that unpopular of one. That is fine.
But if you don't, the suggestion of a wall between the USA and Mexico (a divide which Mexico has at least six populated urban areas) is not unheard of nor unreasonable. The fact that we're having this conversation in a quiz which cites Mexico as having 170,000 armed conflict fatalities is a pretty good indicator of that.
Many countries around the world have border walls, and more are being built all the time. They aren't panaceas but are often very effective.
The most famous case is probably Israel, where the controversial "separation barrier" with the Palestinian Territories reduced suicide bombings from killing hundreds of Israelis a year to almost none at all.
The Israeli separation/security wall is 70 km long. The US-Mexico border is 3,145 km long. Like I said... ridiculous child's solution. The parts of the border where it makes sense to have some kind of barrier already have them.
... seems like my relevant, accurate, inoffensive, apolitical, and much-liked original response to quizwhizz was deleted some 5 years after the fact... if I remember correctly it was something like: no, I don't wonder about that because it's obvious why: it's a ridiculous child's solution that wouldn't work (but he's not smart enough to come up with something better) to a problem that doesn't exist thrown out as red meat to his racist and xenophobic supporters that became an applause line at his rallies. and he likes people applauding for him.
Why not consider making Multiplayer board games like tic tac toe connect 4 etc, at the home page can there be an option saying Online Quizzes, underneath can it say 'Multiplayer' in each jetpunk language. Also can there be more badges, like the European badge Asian badge African badge Oceanian Badge North American Badge South American Badge, and the United States badge the Soccer badge and lots of other sport badges. On the ranking charts can you make top 500.
It's not that crazy in amounts of dead people, but not that many wars happened in 2014-2016 and peak of death in Ukrainian one was in 2014-2015. That's why it's in top(
It's late 2021, and I completely forgot the conflict in Ukraine. I think it's still going on, but I assume that either it's not as serious as it was 6 years ago or the media doesn't care about it.
Yes. They would be somewhere between Mexico and Nigeria if you updated this for 2022, assuming that Russian casualties in Ukraine would get counted as part of the total for Ukraine. But... even before 2022 there were more deaths there than the totals given here for Libya or South Sudan. Not sure why they're not on the list anymore.
Making anything that's "live" requires very complex programming, unlike anything on the site right now. It's very unlikely to ever happen, in my opinion. The best you can do is share quizzes with your friends and compete against them in real time.
Not sure exactly what point this post is intended to make, but 1) COVID-19 kills indiscriminantly. Organized crime usually only targets people who get involved with it (not that makes those lives less meaningful, but there is a different sense of panic knowing that death could strike at random as it does with the virus. 2) Governments have been doing everything they can for a very long time to manage organized crime's effect on society. Our defense mechanisms have been refined over decades to minimize its harm. COVID-19 sprung up overnight and spread like wildfire. The infrastructure is not in place to cope with it. Whatever comparison you're trying to draw is facile and unhelpful.
Man, people really keep looking for new ways to downplay the severity of the coronavirus pandemic. "The flu kills more people a year", "It's only dangerous if you're older than 50", "it's only dangerous to people who aren't of our religious denomination" and just a pile of other excuses that go along the lines of "we're perfectly fine because we can't seem to grasp the reality that we might be in actual danger".
The pandemic is serious and a lot of people are going to die because of it. Organized crime may kill more people, but a virus kills indiscriminately.
The ER where I used to work is currently swamped beyond capacity trying to deal with all the COVID-19 patients or those who suspect they might be infected. Their resources have been stressed to the breaking point. There are people dying in the ICU daily.
On the other hand I worked there for 2 years and I think in that time I may have seen ONE patient come in who was the victim of organized crime? Maybe two?
Evan: yeah, not even close. But the anti-science/anarchist/pro-virus crowd will just move the goal posts and find some other talking point once whatever they were saying before has become or been shown to be wrong.
Regardless of what the dear leader does or doesn't say, the last time there was an active conflict on the Korean peninsula was 70 years ago (so before 2016).
I was surprised to not see the philippines war on drugs make the list. Wikipedia says around 6,000 deaths which seems lower than I expected considering the amount of news coverage it got back when it was happening.
wow really surprised about Mexico being on this list, not sure if it's that bad though. I know there's the cartels and all those gangs and stuff but not sure if it's worse than Yemen or Syria
And despite the huge size, the US-Mexican border is one of the most diligently patrolled in the world. Though, when asked what would make their jobs easier, border patrol agents list things like drones, cameras, and personnel above walls that would be significantly more expensive and less effective. I agree, don't make ignorant statements unless you know the actual facts.
2) I think Trump suggested the wall where there aren't natural barriers. Many of the places you listed have several.
Walls have worked/not worked throughout history. There are countless examples on both sides. The fact is one side in American politics encourages illegal immigration while another does not. If you agree with immigrants being in America illegally, that is your opinion. In fact, it's not even that unpopular of one. That is fine.
But if you don't, the suggestion of a wall between the USA and Mexico (a divide which Mexico has at least six populated urban areas) is not unheard of nor unreasonable. The fact that we're having this conversation in a quiz which cites Mexico as having 170,000 armed conflict fatalities is a pretty good indicator of that.
2) Many, but not all.
The most famous case is probably Israel, where the controversial "separation barrier" with the Palestinian Territories reduced suicide bombings from killing hundreds of Israelis a year to almost none at all.
Source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-border-walls
https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/article-711442
I'm in the f'ing Army too.
The pandemic is serious and a lot of people are going to die because of it. Organized crime may kill more people, but a virus kills indiscriminately.
On the other hand I worked there for 2 years and I think in that time I may have seen ONE patient come in who was the victim of organized crime? Maybe two?