Agreed....at least for the Peace Prize. Political correctness rules in the selection process, and I've lost all respect for this Prize's prestige. As far as I know, the others have retained their integrity.
Economics is quite political and controversial sometimes too. But I agree that most problems are with the Peace Prize. It has been a joke since Kissinger, and it haven't recovered.
Obama being given the prize was definitely premature - and I say that as someone that generally respected him and (at least some of) his achievements. Did he deserve it eventually? Maybe. Did he deserve it in 2009? Absolutely not.
remember when Henry Kissinger and Lê Đức Thọ both recieved the peace nobel price while they were still at war and after Kissinger actively participated in making the decision of this invasion of a foreign country where his side committed unspeakable war crimes...? Yeah...
Depending on the country you're from, it could be synonymous. "Economics" in the US can be the same thing as what is termed "Political Economy" in the UK
A physicist, a chemist and an economist are stranded on a desert island with a crate of canned food but no can opener. You can look up the rest of the joke.
(Nobel did not include an award in economics; it was only created in the 1960s with an endowment from a Swedish bank. So strictly speaking there is no Nobel prize for economics.)
What the hell kind of comment is this? Tell us the joke, or don't tell it. If it's not important enough for you to write in full, just saying nothing is always an option.
Here's the full joke, by the way. Maybe that dude felt like it was great enough to warrant some kind of mystic initiation process known as "googling it", or maybe he was worried he would upset the Mighty Invisible Hand if he told it publicly. I'm not afraid.
A chemist, a physicist and an economist are all trapped on a desert island trying to figure out how to open a can of food.
"Let's heat the can over a fire until it explodes!", exclaims the chemist.
"No no," says the physicist, "let's drop the can onto the rocks from the top of a high tree!"
"I have an idea," says the economist. "First we assume a can opener . . ."
There is no Nobel Prize for economics. Alfred Nobel created five prizes. In 1968, to legitimate a non-science as a real science, the Swedish Central Bank created the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.
At the very least, there needs to be a disclaimer that it includes one category not created by Nobel.
They are all very subjective, not just literature and peace. Who decides what the best physics, medicine, or chemistry achievement is? There are almost always competing alternatives that may, in some cases, be just as worthy of the award as those that won it. These categories are just as subjective as the rest.
The question wasn't about the subjectivity of the field itself but of the decision in each field for who wins the prize, which is subjective regardless of category.
People can say what they want, but the Nobel Foundation certainly treats the Economics prize very similarly to the rest of the prizes in terms of the timing of the announcement, the decision process, and the award ceremony. This is pretty hard to reconcile with the view that it's a "fake Nobel."
I love how the quiz description says including one controversial category that many say doesn't exist and the comments are just people saying it doesn't exist
I agree, but also looking back at Wayback Machine, the description wasn't added until at least October of 2023. Most of these comments were made before it was added.
(Nobel did not include an award in economics; it was only created in the 1960s with an endowment from a Swedish bank. So strictly speaking there is no Nobel prize for economics.)
A chemist, a physicist and an economist are all trapped on a desert island trying to figure out how to open a can of food.
"Let's heat the can over a fire until it explodes!", exclaims the chemist.
"No no," says the physicist, "let's drop the can onto the rocks from the top of a high tree!"
"I have an idea," says the economist. "First we assume a can opener . . ."
At the very least, there needs to be a disclaimer that it includes one category not created by Nobel.
Literature and Peace are extremely subjective and the peace prize especially is a token award which requires grand gestures but no results.
Meanwhile, as others have pointed out, Economics is technically not even a Nobel prize and also it is clearly still a dubious science in its infancy.