Enjoy! One tip: There are just 2 bus routes on the island, clockwise and anti-clockwise, and it's worth getting a 10-trip bus pass to get you around (no pun intended).
Just one question: How can the Cooks be 'fully independent' if New Zealand takes all the defense and foreign affairs? As far as I know, every independent nation of this world is part of the UN. (I don‘t think the Cooks are)
"Independence" is a matter of degree, and in practice every country is interdependent on others to some extent. Here are the nations whose defence and foreign affairs are run by other nations: Cook Islands, Niue and Samoa (New Zealand); Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau (all United States); Andorra (France and Spain); Kiribati (Australia and New Zealand); Monaco (France); Liechtenstein (Switzerland); Nauru (Australia); San Marino (Italy) and Vatican City (Switzerland and Italy). Many other countries sign away their defence sovereignity through defence pacts that oblige them to enter wars they're not directly involved in.
Good, good. But all these countries (except Niue and the Cooks) are actually recognized UN members. So why don‘t these two join the UN? I mean, New Zealand can still be the protective power. Because on the one hand I understand that a place so isolated from the rest of New Zealand wants to have a higher autonomy, but on the other hand, if the Cooks don‘t have (or don‘t want to have) their voice in the 'world parliament' and be dependent on this issue, why aren‘t they just an autonomous region, like Catalonia or South Tyrol within NZ?
I‘m not ranting, I‘m just interested in how that special free association system works. Maybe you can answer that question for me (since you‘re a Kiwi:) - What are possible disadvantages for NZ if NZ would give 100% autonomy to the Cook Islands so that they can join the UN and then start protecting them again? (Like the USA does that with the UN member Marshall Islands). It seems to me that the Cook Islands deserve a seat in the world parliament, right?
In our opinion, there is a fallacy in your question, namely the suggestion that a country is not a country unless it is in the United Nations. We think that if (a) a country declares itself to be one, and (b) if enough other countries agree that it is, then it's a country. That said, here's the UN-info re the Cook Islands: As of 2014, the Cook Islands have diplomatic relations in its own name with 43 other countries. The Cook Islands is not a United Nations member state, but, along with Niue, has had their "full treaty-making capacity" recognised by United Nations Secretariat, and is a full member of the WHO and UNESCO UN specialised agencies, is an associate member of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) and a Member of the Assembly of States of the International Criminal Court.
As your second question, the Cook Islands are classified as a Jetpunk country in our quizzes. There are many reasons we do that, but here are just three: (1) Its participation in the UN as described above; (2) When the maritime border between the Cook Islands and American Samoa was agreed to in 1980, that treaty was signed by the United States and the Cook Islands, not New Zealand; and (3) New Zealanders visiting the Cook Islands must clear customs on entry, and their passports are stamped with a 30-day, employment-prohibited, entry permit. These sorts of things establish sufficient independence of foreign policy to, in our view, accept its nationhood. "Jetpunk" (ie Dan) uses different criteria to classify a country as a country, which is not too surprising as there are many, many measures one can use to decide what gets counted and what does not.
Interesting enough. So, if you argue that 1) when a country declares itself independent and 2) enough other countries recognize them, why isn‘t Palestine a country? Sure, there is a lot of controversy, but they hold territory and are recognized by 136 UN members. I just start to think that JetPunk‘s classification of a "country" is a bit random. If Vatican City is not a UN member, but still part of the quiz, why can‘t Palestine be one? Israel is not recognized by 30 countries and is still in the quiz. And if only 20 or so countries recognize Taiwan, why can‘t the Cooks be in the Countries of the World Quiz? (with 43)
I‘m not ranting, I‘m just interested in how that special free association system works. Maybe you can answer that question for me (since you‘re a Kiwi:) - What are possible disadvantages for NZ if NZ would give 100% autonomy to the Cook Islands so that they can join the UN and then start protecting them again? (Like the USA does that with the UN member Marshall Islands). It seems to me that the Cook Islands deserve a seat in the world parliament, right?