This is much harder than the countries with the most forest quiz.. and.. having been to Korea it's almost impossible to believe that either North or South Korea has more forest coverage than places like Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Cameroon, etc- places that you think of as being totally covered by jungle. The Korean peninsula was completely denuded by the Japanese in WW2. Barely a matchstick or toothpick left behind. and taking a train across the entire country I don't recall seeing a single forest the whole time.. just a few clumps of trees here and there.
Slovenia, Japan, and Sweden are also pretty surprising.
what skukka said. That was one of the few that wasnt just a random guess for me. It is the greenest country i have ever driven through. I can allways remember thinking wow it is green here !! (going denmark-sweden-norway you couldnt help but notice it ) as soon as I went over the border you could tell you were in a different country.
Same holds for Slovenia. I've cycled across the country and it is astonishing how green it is since I live in the nearby region in Italy which is anywhere close to that.
Japan doesn't surprise me. Despite it's huge population and small area, that population is heavily concentrated in proximity to the Pacific coast. Much of the interior of Honshu and the Sea of Japan coast is much less densely populated and it doesn't take long from any major Japanese city to find yourself in thick woodland. Kyoto's basically entirely surrounded by it. I suspect it's a result of having such a mountainous interior and the Pacific coastal plains being so fertile as a result of the volcanic soil and run-off from those mountains.
As a Korean, I can tell you that there are quite a lot of forests in the countryside. We used to have severe deforestation but we've gone through a massive reforestation scheme in the 1970s and 80s - and as a legacy of this we even have a "tree-planting day" every year (April 5th) which used to be a holiday
Lived in South Korea for three years. Once you're outside of the Seoul-Incheon metropolitan area most of the country is forested hills. The other cities are much smaller and tend to be very dense, so there's a lot of space for trees.
Don't know how you managed to take a train across the country and not notice this. Maybe you fell asleep?
I can't believe Japan and South Korea are in the list. For those who have been there, we know that it feels like there isn't any kind of forest gap between Tokyo and Hiroshima. I would assume the other islands are more forested. Where is the source? Thanks.
Having lived for years in Japan, I have to say I don't agree with your feelings icazares. For example, Mt. Takao is only 30 minutes from Tokyo by train, and it is a UN protected biosphere with beautiful hiking and wilderness. Outside of the metro areas, there many gorgeous forests in addition to agricultural areas. But then if you go to other islands like Hokkaido of course it gets much more sparsely populated.
I agree. Japan has a typical population concentration, where all activities are concentrated in relatively small strips. From a train you'd see all the built-up areas, but the forest and other nature are usually very close. You just don't notice it as much moving from city to city.
About 70% of Japan is unhabitable mountainous terrain where most of the forests stay untouched. If you travel around the country by train, you would most likely go straight through these mountains via tunnels or pass by urban areas/small towns surrounding the train stations, which is why you'd likely not notice it
Apparently, hundreds of years ago, Japan was experiencing a deforestation crisis and took steps to correct it as soon as 1670 A.D. The large amount of land that is forested is the result of conscious decisions going back hundreds of years.
If you look on a map, south korea looks to be densely covered with cities, one might think that a big part of the space between them would be agricultural areas.
Thinking of japan, I mostly remembered those vast urban areas around Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya... and that much of the country is mountainous.
Maybe that's where I made the mistake to think about the japanese mountains like of the alps or even higher mountain ranges where there are no trees over the tree-line...
wow. i got absolutely slaughtered on this quiz. 4/20. way harder than i thought it would be. of course most of the answers are tiny little countries, so...
I know they're technically not small island countries due to land borders, but I feel that Brunei and Montenegro should also be marked red because of their tiny populations.
Hey guys I just made my first quiz “guess the ethnicity #1” I just really want people to see it and hopefully it will be nominated! Go ahead and check it out!
This is definitely a very oddball group of countries... basically covers every continent and has countries that have almost no similarities. On another note, it's nice to see that Brazil is on here despite all their deforestation. However, given that this report was from 3 years ago, before the rate of the burning of the Amazon accelerated, it wouldn't surprise me if it was off the list now.
Only 20% of the Amazon was deforested since the 50s, and even with the current increases, it currently ammounts to MUCH less than 1% deforested every year. So no, Brazil will remain on the list for the foreseeable future
If not for the rich oil fields off the coast, I think Brunei wouldn’t have been on this list since oil means they have no need to destroy their rainforests for planting cash crops. Other parts of Borneo in Indonesia and Malaysia on the other hand, have undergone substantial deforestation for oil palm.
We need to distinguish between "countries" and tiny "city states" like Monaco and San Marino, and "island nations" like Tonga and Barbados. This is true for many other quizzes.
People surprised by Sweden. But if you leave my city in any direction its NOTHING but forest for 1-2 hours. And I live in the south which is where 90% of the population lives too
Slovenia, Japan, and Sweden are also pretty surprising.
Don't know how you managed to take a train across the country and not notice this. Maybe you fell asleep?
If you look on a map, south korea looks to be densely covered with cities, one might think that a big part of the space between them would be agricultural areas.
Thinking of japan, I mostly remembered those vast urban areas around Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya... and that much of the country is mountainous.
Maybe that's where I made the mistake to think about the japanese mountains like of the alps or even higher mountain ranges where there are no trees over the tree-line...
It have so many forest ok