I tried Missouri and Kentucky, I was wrong. As it turns out, they are 2 of 5 Union States (along with West Virginia, Maryland and Delaware) that permitted slavery during the war.
Historians call them "Border States" and they were considered key areas by the North to win the war. Lincoln said something like, "I'd like to hope God is with me but I must have Kentucky on my side."
West Virginia was cut off from Virginia as a result of the Civil War. Maryland was essentially under military occupation by the Union as it completely encircled the Union capital- Washington DC.
The people up in those western counties of Virginia were extremely rural and poorer than the Virginians in the east. Due to the political power in Virginia was in the hands of a slave holding planter class, many of these country folk (I believe they were known as Yeoman) resented slavery as slavery made these country folks' possibility to profit impossible due to competition. Thus, West Virginia seceded from Virginia to join the Union in order to gain power for themselves, so that they would no longer be economically dependent on the slaver elite.
At the start of the Civil War, Virginia voted to secede from the Union in 1861. This was not a popular move in the northwestern part of the state. Thus, West Virginia broke off from Virginia in response. Without the Civil War this would not have happened.
Also, you cant form a state from an existing one, so West Virginia was creating from the only loophole in that - Where the state it belongs to secedes.
qcumber: Actually, you can form a state from an existing one, but only if "everyone's on board." Per the US Constitution, forming such a state requires "the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress." (Article IV, Section 3)
those states are border states those are states that are slave states but they do not secede from the union. there were four missouri, kentucky,delaware ,and maryland
Missouri was actually pretty undecided. In the siege of Vicksburg, Missouri sent 17 regiments to fight on the Confederate side and 22 to fight on the Union side.
It wasn't undecided, it was divided. In Arkansas my husband's paternal great-grandfather had two brothers, and one fought for the north and the other fought for the south. His maternal great-grandfather fought for the north while his twin brother fought for the south. Sometimes men switched armies, too. Bushwhackers would threaten their families if they didn't, or one side would take prisoners and offer them a choice of hanging or taking an oath to switch to the other side. Sometimes a family would send one son to each side in the hopes that after the war they would have one family member who fought on the winning side and hopefully be able to keep their farm. I read about a man in this area who tried to remain neutral and his home was ransacked and burned by Yankees, then the Rebs came along and shot him and then strung up his body as a warning to those who refused to join them.
This has already been addressed, but "undecided" is a weird term. Some states were fractured and had disputes within their own states, sometimes even producing rival governments. So "undecided" isn't really correct.
Missouri and Kentucky are the best examples. Overall the support for the Confederacy was more sprawling than any map shows (Cherokee, Choctaw, Creek, and Chicasaw Nation fought for the Confederacy, as well as Confederate Arizona), but the flip side is it was also opposed by many within the Confederate boundaries, too. It was a very complicated time and opinions strongly varied even between friends, relatives, and the like.
I'm honestly surprised. The capital of the Confederacy was in Virginia. I'm pretty sure that's one of the many things non-Virginians would know about Virginia.
You people who think you got 100%--I am the real author, and I haven't even been born yet. I'll let you know when that occurs, and when I finish writing the quiz.
I got 102.563% correct, finished at the 54 BC mark, and I'm only a 3 week old damaged, fake Christmas Tree, sold from your local foster home on the eastern side of western Jupiter during a solar eclipse on Wednesday.
Frankfort, Kentucky, was the only state capital to be captured during the American Civil War. Also, both the presidents of the USA and the CSA (Lincoln and Davis) were born in Kentucky. Kentucky is a pretty important place, historically!
Careful with your wording now, Raleigh was the capital of North Carolina during the Civil War (still is) and was captured during the Civil War during Sherman's March after he captured Savannah in Georgia and Columbia (the capital of South Carolina at the time).
As well as Richmond, Jackson, and many others. I believe what he meant was that it was the only Union state capital to be captured by the Confederate States.
I think Frankfurt was the only capital captured by the Confederacy (someone correct me if I'm wrong). Nonetheless Kentucky was of great importance, both personally and militarily, to Davis and Lincoln. Pretty cool.
There's a lot of interesting history that goes in to this conflict. Many historians call it the first modern war in history, starting with tactics very reminiscent of those used by Napoleon and ending in some places in the sort of trench warfare that would characterize WW1. It's a very important part of both US and world history.
My favorite documentary on the subject has a narrow focus: just the final month of the war, and is based on the book April 1865: The Month That Saved America. It was put out by the History Channel and unfortunately is very hard to find online or else I'd link to it.
Southern-sympathizing, Lincoln-hating Maryland remained part of the Union under federal military force. In doing my genealogy, I found that my 2x great-grandfather and his 3 brothers fought on both sides of the Civil War: 3 on the Union side and 1 on the Confederate side. The oldest brother (Union) came here from Germany with his parents, with the others born here. None were slaveholders. Interesting ... I expected to see more Southern sympathies in my family, based on what the history books tell us. Guess they had more pride and love for the Union than many Marylanders.
Well, more or less. Slavery is still legal in the US, "as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted." In other words, if companies want slave labor they can get it from prisons. And they do.
Seriously. The South now is becoming flooded with Northerners fleeing Northern cities that have devolved into dystopian wastelands. The climate has attracted people, as well.
And population size is the only reason the North won the war. While the South lost (convincingly) today the South is set to pass the North in just about every metric in the next generation or two. It's shocking how things can change given enough time.
Yes, population in southern states is rising. And you say that's because folks are escaping "dystopian wastelands"? Please. Put down the bottle. Love to hear about those metrics of yours. In the meantime, you might do well to take some of those Jetpunk quizzes asking which American states have the poorest people, the least-educated people, the people with the lowest life-expectancy, and on and on. I don't want to shock you, but those metrics aren't indicating your glorious south as some kind of new Eden.
There may be a lot of great cities in the South, but it is an outright falsehood to claim that the South is on track to be ahead of the north/west in any major metric, let alone all of them. States like Mississippi and Arkansas are far poorer than most others, and while Texas, Florida and Georgia's populations have been growing significantly, that doesn't make up the entire South.
The South will never rise to the level of the North or the West really. The South will bring disaster upon itself via pollution in the Gulf. Short turn gains from extraction of resources will be paid for by the future generations unfortunately.
Even Southern cuisine will be impacted by the increasing amounts of oil in your waters. The rivers that flow to the South will also be impacted by industrial pollution. For example, the train derailment in Ohio last year. All that flows down South. That and the collapse of the housing market in coastal areas, specifically Florida. We will see home insurance agencies pull out of the area.
Work can be done to avoid these disasters but Southern governors can't even acknowledge the issue let alone take a stand to protect your ecosystems. I hope I'm wrong but ain't holding my breath.
Missouri and Kentucky are the best examples. Overall the support for the Confederacy was more sprawling than any map shows (Cherokee, Choctaw, Creek, and Chicasaw Nation fought for the Confederacy, as well as Confederate Arizona), but the flip side is it was also opposed by many within the Confederate boundaries, too. It was a very complicated time and opinions strongly varied even between friends, relatives, and the like.
My favorite documentary on the subject has a narrow focus: just the final month of the war, and is based on the book April 1865: The Month That Saved America. It was put out by the History Channel and unfortunately is very hard to find online or else I'd link to it.
in an effort to combat coastal erosion that threatens our ecosystems and borders to the gulf.
Seriously. The South now is becoming flooded with Northerners fleeing Northern cities that have devolved into dystopian wastelands. The climate has attracted people, as well.
And population size is the only reason the North won the war. While the South lost (convincingly) today the South is set to pass the North in just about every metric in the next generation or two. It's shocking how things can change given enough time.
also, you're making it hard to not believe you're an actual confederate sympathizer
Even Southern cuisine will be impacted by the increasing amounts of oil in your waters. The rivers that flow to the South will also be impacted by industrial pollution. For example, the train derailment in Ohio last year. All that flows down South. That and the collapse of the housing market in coastal areas, specifically Florida. We will see home insurance agencies pull out of the area.
Work can be done to avoid these disasters but Southern governors can't even acknowledge the issue let alone take a stand to protect your ecosystems. I hope I'm wrong but ain't holding my breath.