French Guiana is an integral part of France and thus would be under nato protection, alongside Martinique, Guadeloupe, reunion, and mayotte. However places like New Caledonia or French polynesia wouldn’t.
Actually, NATO Article 6 specifically states that territories outside of Europe and North America are not under NATO protection, with the Asian territories of Turkey tacked on in an amendment once Turkey joined. It also exempts from protection any territory in the tropics or further south. This was to avoid having NATO get dragged into post-colonial wars of NATO members trying to hold on to their colonies. The amount of integration a region of a country has doesn't have much to do with it, those areas are explicitly not covered even if they are integral to a country.
An attack on French Guiana would not trigger NATO to defend it, nor would attacks on any other french overseas territories except St Pierre and Miquelon off the coast of Canada. That also applies to other countries overseas territories, The Falklands War did not trigger a NATO response. Theoretically an attack on Hawaii would not trigger one either, assuming no mainland territories were attacked at the same time.
You have a geographical map for article 5 in the Navo. Everything colonial land of nato countries inside the geographical map are seen as a attack on every nato member. The geographical map is a map in North America, North Africa, Europe, And west Asia. In these colonial lands which are located in the geographical map are attacked, the other nato countries also have to join due to article 5. French Guiana is outside the geographical map. But most countries in the Nato would send some troops to French Guiana to help France although it is not permitted since it is not article 5.
Check here these parliamentary works about the venue of austrian forces (not member of nato) in French Guyana :-D https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/dossiers/accord_autriche_personnels_armee_guyane.asp
Yes, an agreement between the Government of France and of Austria, not some independent Guyanese authority. What do you think this points out about French Guiana? I'm afraid my French doesn't stretch so far.
You're right. It's never "so simple" applying rules to every country, and edge cases can break down, but there is a roughly (roughly!) consistent distinction between things which are part of a country and things which are controlled by a country, which we'll often call territories.
Every country is slightly different, so New Caledonia's "exceptional status" is not exactly equivalent to a "crown dependency" of the UK or a "U.S. territory" or Niue's "free association". But it's convenient to make broad buckets to categorize thing and these are the buckets usually used on Jetpunk. We have to accept that no taxonomy will fit every piece of land perfectly and unambiguously and deal with it with common sense.
The UK has bases in Akrotiri and Dhekelia, and Northern Cyprus has been occupied by Turkey (although it claims to be independent) since the invasion in 1974. Neither territory is considered by its parent country to be an integral part of the country, though, so they shouldn't count for this quiz. French Guiana is considered an overseas department--not a territory--of France, so it is just as "French", legally speaking, as Brittany.
Can we get a caveat to this effect? It seems reasonable not to count Cyprus, but "share a land border" does not say anything about Overseas Territories vs integrated overseas regions.
Which for most quizzes makes perfect sense so I understand why it's extended to this quiz. But in the particular case of a quiz about a military alliance, it's odd to include French Guyana which isn't protected by NATO, but ignore British holdings in Cyprus which almost certainly are.
Ukraine would never be able to join NATO so long as it has active conflict within its borders. All that Putin would have needed to do to stop Ukraine from joining was to keep the War in the Donbass going indefinitely, and Ukraine would never be able to join.
I certainly won’t deny that. I have no love for that man and absolutely stand with the Ukrainian people. I just try my best to look at things from multiple perspectives in most cases too. NATO certainly is not a perfect solution either.
The Guantanamo base isn't US territory, it's leased land. (The lease dates to before the revolution and the Castro government, and had no official end date.) The US sends a rent check every year; the Cubans never deposit it (except once, by accident).
Alright, I missed Ireland but I love how I missed Suriname, Brazil, and Morocco. Especially Morocco. It's so funny how French Guiana is an actual department instead of an overseas territory so you end up forgetting about it on so many quizzes. I thought Mexico was the only country in America that bordered a NATO country. Fun quiz.
I should've got Brazil and Suriname, I thought Ireland were in it but I knew it was an I so probably should've guessed them. I'd have never got Morocco, I know Spain does have exclaves in Africa but they don't just spring to mind without being reminded.
No they probably won't because, as @kitsims says, Akrotiri and Dhekelia are not part of the UK. They're UK dependencies, more specifically overseas territories, but not part of the UK of GB and NI.
It's actually not 100% clear whether overseas territories of NATO members are considered part of NATO territory. Akrotiri and Dhekelia definitely aren't part of e.g. the Commonwealth or EU, but NATO is a bit more blurry.
If, say, Syria went rogue and attacked *only* Akrotiri and Dhekelia, it would be the UK that defended them (like the Falklands War - no NATO involvement), although it's not inconceivable that a NATO force would provide support *if* the UK requested it.
Whether all that means Cyprus should be on the list or not, I don't know...
An attack on French Guiana would not trigger NATO to defend it, nor would attacks on any other french overseas territories except St Pierre and Miquelon off the coast of Canada. That also applies to other countries overseas territories, The Falklands War did not trigger a NATO response. Theoretically an attack on Hawaii would not trigger one either, assuming no mainland territories were attacked at the same time.
Check here these parliamentary works about the venue of austrian forces (not member of nato) in French Guyana :-D https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/dossiers/accord_autriche_personnels_armee_guyane.asp
You're right. It's never "so simple" applying rules to every country, and edge cases can break down, but there is a roughly (roughly!) consistent distinction between things which are part of a country and things which are controlled by a country, which we'll often call territories.
Every country is slightly different, so New Caledonia's "exceptional status" is not exactly equivalent to a "crown dependency" of the UK or a "U.S. territory" or Niue's "free association". But it's convenient to make broad buckets to categorize thing and these are the buckets usually used on Jetpunk. We have to accept that no taxonomy will fit every piece of land perfectly and unambiguously and deal with it with common sense.
Confused? It's similar to the difference between Puerto Rico (a territory) and Hawaii (a state).
French Guiana, Ceuta, and Melilla: we can explain
Izgubićeš jato crnih bombardera
"With the Serbs, spite must not be forced.
You will lose a flock of black bombers"
It doesn't seem so simple. Check here these parliamentary workings about the venue of Austrian forces (not NATO member) in French Guiana. :-D
https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/dossiers/accord_autriche_personnels_armee_guyane.asp
(anyway, the quizz goes over landborders of countries, not about protection)
Correct version:
"Name the countries which are not in NATO but which share a land border with one of its members."
It's actually not 100% clear whether overseas territories of NATO members are considered part of NATO territory. Akrotiri and Dhekelia definitely aren't part of e.g. the Commonwealth or EU, but NATO is a bit more blurry.
If, say, Syria went rogue and attacked *only* Akrotiri and Dhekelia, it would be the UK that defended them (like the Falklands War - no NATO involvement), although it's not inconceivable that a NATO force would provide support *if* the UK requested it.
Whether all that means Cyprus should be on the list or not, I don't know...