Great! one of few quizzes on Italy that i totally appreciate: without stereotypical descriptions or wrongly spelled words. Good job! By the way, you could also accept just Alfa for Alfa Romeo, since this is the way in Italy we informally refer to it (i should know, i have one)
Random thought from the Quizmaster. I think the Edict of Milan is a good example of why slippery slopes arguments have validity. Probably at the time of the edict, people said "Don't worry. Nobody is coming for your pagan temples. This just gives Christians equal rights". And that is exactly what happened. For awhile. But by the reign of Theodosius seventy years later, Christianity was the state religion, the temples were looted and vandalized, the Vestal Virgins were disbanded, and many important pagan practices were banned.
Just assemble an advisory panel, government study, regulatory board or temporary law and apply the law of acceleration and it will correlate exactly to the pace before you're in free fall.
Given that before the Edict, we had bloody persecution of non-Roman religion (especially Christianity) by the Empire, perhaps it's not so much 'slippery slope', but the tendency of Empires to always suppress threats to their power?
Constantine used the Edict to then invade the Eastern Empire on the grounds of 'allowing people to be free to believe what they want'. With the Edict he not only got a very large underground movement against Imperial Might to stop being against Imperial Might, but become pro-Imperial Might as long as it was *his* Imperial Might.
And, of course, he could then also control Christianity with it being tolerated. He could order bishops to come to a council to sort out what was a dispute in one city. He could then exile bishops for upholding the council's decision against his wishes. Both of which he did. It was all about power and control, as was Theodosius' decree that allowed him to suppress the army and elites that were threatening his grip on power.
I don't think it's an example that slippery slope arguments have validity. At best it's an example that slippery slope arguments CAN have validity in certain circumstances.
Nice quiz! Just wondering about the saffron question, though... In my experience, most risottos (risotti?) aren't yellow. Is the Milanese variant different? I was surprised to see the answer.
You're right. "Risotto" is a common name, there are dozens of risotti and the risotto alla milanese is the saffron-yellow one. Maybe "risotto" sounds a bit generic as an answer.
St Ambrose baptised St Augustine in Milan on Easter morning 387AD, after Augustine's late-in-life conversion from a life of general misbehaviour. There could be an interesting question about that in here somewhere...
Constantine used the Edict to then invade the Eastern Empire on the grounds of 'allowing people to be free to believe what they want'. With the Edict he not only got a very large underground movement against Imperial Might to stop being against Imperial Might, but become pro-Imperial Might as long as it was *his* Imperial Might.
And, of course, he could then also control Christianity with it being tolerated. He could order bishops to come to a council to sort out what was a dispute in one city. He could then exile bishops for upholding the council's decision against his wishes. Both of which he did. It was all about power and control, as was Theodosius' decree that allowed him to suppress the army and elites that were threatening his grip on power.
Personally, I wouldn't dream of making it any other way.
A different risotto, from a different part of the country, though? Not so much.
A: No, no I cannot. I got some of them, though.