Including ISS is arguable. It originated from earth, and so is not really 'extraterrestrial', plus, technically, it's low earth orbit is still within the earth's atmosphere.
A casual dictionary search tells me something is extraterrestrial when it is "Originating or located or occurring outside Earth or its atmosphere". It is located outside the Earth, thus it's extraterrestrial (though not "extraterrestrial in origin" for example).
There's no "technical" point at which Earth's atmosphere stops... it just keeps going on getting thinner and thinner. But by common convention it ends and space begins at the Kármán line, 100 km above the surface of the Earth, and at 400 km, the ISS is well above that.
So while I would put a caveat that not all the objects are natural, or something like that, it's not incorrect as it stands.
I used to know well the names of Vega, Arcturus, Procyon, etc... some of them featured in fan-fiction authored by myself or my girlfriend in high school. We were both sci-fi geeks. And I studied Astronomy once a long time ago. Now, 20 years later, I only could remember 3 stars, but I got all the other objects.
Are Halley's and other comets not brighter than some of these stars? Do these objects have to be visible from Earth at all times? I would think not since it is based on maximal brightness not averages. Though... then you open up the possibility of objects entering the atmosphere. I bet the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs was pretty damn bright for at least a short while.
Right now it does - when it gets to the inner solar system its magnitude is lower than 6, making it a great comet. The brightest comets ever, though, have gotten all the way to -10 (Comet Ikeya-Seki).
Definitely some more guidance needed here. I realize you can't do anything about long-period comets, but Halley's should be on there. And many of the meteor showers (e.g. Perseids) reach negative magnitudes regularly.
Will China's Tiangong space station project make the list now or soon? I did try to look it up and one page referred to a max magnitude of +1, but the article was from 5 years ago and not actually about the current station... So I'm sure it can be considerably brighter than that now!
I've added it at -4 as that's what it says http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Space_Station
although it can reach -5.9 according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparent_magnitude
There's no "technical" point at which Earth's atmosphere stops... it just keeps going on getting thinner and thinner. But by common convention it ends and space begins at the Kármán line, 100 km above the surface of the Earth, and at 400 km, the ISS is well above that.
So while I would put a caveat that not all the objects are natural, or something like that, it's not incorrect as it stands.
Will China's Tiangong space station project make the list now or soon? I did try to look it up and one page referred to a max magnitude of +1, but the article was from 5 years ago and not actually about the current station... So I'm sure it can be considerably brighter than that now!
Space.com: Spotting Tiangong-2