The stats for HK/Macau/Zhuhai/Shenzhen/Guangzhou are all going to be massively inflated because many people cross these borders daily between the mainland and HK/Macau
I'm from HK. And for your reference, there are countless people from mainland China coming to HK/Macau for a 1-day trip, and some of them happen to do it once a week for shopping. It's sometimes vice versa, and it is still to some extent tourism
part of why it would be much more interesting if they just counted every overnight stay regardless of whether or not the visitor crossed an international boundary (or in the case of Hong Kong and Macao, crossed an internal division within the country). Doing otherwise introduces and arbitrary variable and makes the results highly inconsistent.
and all of these cities in the EU/Schengen Area are now just as easy to travel between as any two cities within any other country. Actually easier. There is a border checkpoint between Hong Kong and the rest of China, unlike traveling between Vienna, Prague, Munich, and Budapest.
Would be much more interesting and relevant to see a quiz on cities by total number of tourists (international and domestic), but I know that data is hard to come by. I've looked. Most of these European cities would not make it on to such a quiz. Little silly to count someone from Malmo visiting Copenhagen more than someone from Boston flying to Honolulu. Even if the bridge toll for the former trip might cost more than the airfare for the latter.
So what? Even if you were driving from Malmo to Copenhagen you could still stay overnight if you wanted to and this would count while a family from Anchorage taking a trip to Miami or one from Beijing going to Guangzhou does not count.
I also couldn't find why Mugla has such high numbers, it's close to the sea but I doubt many people spend the night there before heading on to the resorts.
Nope, the English spelling is Brussels, the Dutch one is Brussel and the French one is Bruxelles. The French version has two Ls but then you would need to write it fully in French.
Walla Walla, Washington's "world famous" Marcus Whitman Hotel is advertising on this quiz of most visited world cities. Looks nice in the carefully taken pictures. I see neither Walla Walla nor anywhere in South America like Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Lima or Montevideo on the quiz map being clogged by you hordes. Where should I choose? I know where Bugs Bunny would go.
People are deffinetely missing beautiful places in South America. It might be far away but you can see the best waterfalls and the best mountainous landscapes on Earth not to mention lots of big european look alike cities.
The problem is not only being far away. I just don't like to be a tourist in parts of the world where there is a high crime rate, which is the case in most of the American continent.
Penang is an island, and a province, but not a city. Penang's main city is George Town. I have my doubts abut Ha Long as well, because "Ha Long" will refer to visitors to the amazing islands of Vietnam's Halong Bay. As happened to us and a gazillion other tourists this month when we visited, the trip to the bay, and those islands, bypasses Ha Long city completely.
I was going to complain about Penang being a state rather than a city but then realised that I got allowed Bali rather than Denpasur (which I probably wouldn't have got) so I'm keeping quiet!
Do we know why in 2018 Euromonitor still considered Macau and Hong Kong to be separate countries? They have autonomous judicial and legislative powers but on defence and diplomacy they are still part of China.
I don't know about Delhi and Agra, but Hong Kong and Macau cannot be combined. They are separate cities, and people go there for various reasons. And people who go to Hong Kong don't necessarily also go to Macau, and vice versa. Combining these two would just be like combining Tokyo and Kyoto, which is stupid to do. Both cities just happen to be in the same area, the only thing being that efficient transportation connects the two cities.
There's even a border between Hong Kong and Macau, you cannot circulate freely between them, contrarily to what happens, for example, in most of Europe. How could they be combined?
You can not combine Delhi and Agra. They are 250 km from each other. Plus a lot of international tourists to India are people of Indian descent who do not always visit both together. And even if they did, this would make as much sense as combining New York City and DC because international tourists might visit both
and as I've pointed out before, I think, for sure Phuket Town is not receiving more tourists than Patong, Kamala, etc etc. Phuket Town is not a resort town. Phuket is the name of the island. Most tourists go to Patong.
Washington DC doesn't get that many international tourists. It is fairly popular among Americans, and you'd be hard-pressed to find someone in New England or the Mid-Atlantic who hasn't been .
George Town should be an accepted answer for Penang. Penang is the name of the state of which George Town is the capital city of. It is also the name of the island where George Town is situated on. Bali is an acceptable answer for the city of Denpasar, so should George Town be for Penang.
Some of these seem fishy to me. For example, more people visit Phnom Penh than Mexico City or Rio de Janeiro (neither of which are even on this list)? Antalya, which I've never even heard of before, is more popular than LA or Venice? Denpasar draws in about as many people as Barcelona and Milan, despite the fact that Spain and Italy are, respectively, 3rd and 5th in terms of total international tourism while Indonesia is nowhere near?
Just because you have not heard of a major tourist destination before does not mean it is fishy. A simple comparison of Antalya airport's international arrivals with Rio/GIG (half of Antalya's) and Mexico City (not much more than half) will tell you all you need to know. The reality of distance and relative population density means the western hemisphere destinations just don't make the cut - compared to Antalya which is within easy reach of western European countries.
It surprises me that France is somehow the most visited country on Earth when places like Italy, China, and US have a higher number of magnet cities. Outside of Paris and maybe Nice, no one place stands out as a tourist hub, while Italy has Milan, Florence, Rome, Venice, Verona, etc.
People from surrounding countries do visit various bits of France though. Aquitaine, Dordogne and the Cote d'Azur are all popular destinations for UK tourists I think, while not always having a city 'hub' - it's more for beaches and sunshine. And Paris is just so overwhelmingly touristy that I'm unsurprised by it.
There's a simple answer to that - tourism in countries like China concentrates on these "magnet cities", while France gets a lot of tourists in every part of the country. Let it be Brittany, the Cote d'Azur, Alsace, the Alps, Paris, the Provence... Chances are high you'll meet international tourists wherever you are. A lot of them.
If you list Florence and Verona for Italy, you might as well list Strasbourg and Marseille for France.
http://www.jetpunk.com/explain-points
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Mu%C4%9Fla_districts.png/350px-Mu%C4%9Fla_districts.png
"Muğla Merkezi" is the city centre of Muğla.
surprised Manila or Rio de janeiro not here.
some cities may better be combined because many overlap of tourists such as Hong Kong/Macau, Delhi/Agra.
If you list Florence and Verona for Italy, you might as well list Strasbourg and Marseille for France.