Not Really. Even though they have very similar names, they were very different empires. Here are some differences. Rome: Spoken Latin, Eastern Rome: Spoke Greek, Rome: Practiced Roman Religion, Eastern Rome: Practiced Christianity. Not to mention Justinian's code, Greek Fire, the Byzant, Architecture, The Land Area, etc.
Easteners called themselves the Romans because they were the true spirit of the empire, when the western part just gave up they keep on the business thanks to the Aurelian walls, Theodosius' rules, Diocletian administration and the Constantine's idea of a central religion. Greek was adopted as it was the most common language during centuries as well as the eastern views on Christianity.(In the same way the Goths assimilated the latin and the occidental views on religion of the western side)
Rome fall in 576 but the Roman empire outlived by almost a millennia.
@WolfCam both Rome and Byzantine spoke Greek, at least in the East. Western providences of Byzantine spoke Latin still in the West. And Christian emperors from Rome are included in this quiz so this has nothing to do with paganism or Christianity.
@someone2018 For a lot of it's history, Byzantine had control over Rome itself, and later on was near it's border, if we want to use your logic. Even then, being Roman doesn't mean having Rome, otherwise why would we call it the country in Eastern Europe, Romania? Additionally, the official name of Constantinople was Nova Roma or New Rome, so for all of Byzantine's existance, it had (New) Rome.
The capital was moved from Rome to Constantinople. Then the empire split in two. Then the western half fell, and was later reconquered by the eastern half. At the time nobody thought of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) empire as anything other than the Roman Empire.
It's hard to tell if usurpators belong to the list or not... I would say Maxentius does but Vetriano? No I would definitely not have included him (or else I would have included many others, like some of the thirty tyrants for example, or Eugenius).
Yeah, he was the one that stood out for me the most too. I have no idea why he wasn't included on the wiki page when there are other usurpers with a far weaker claim to the throne were.
That's not saying anything. There are many received ideas about Roman history, about Antiquity in general in fact... What can be considered as a mad Roman? These guys were civilized but very brutal, which was normal considering the standards of the epoch. What is known about Elagabalus... his name was in fact Varius Avitus Bassiannus, rechristened in Marcus Aurelius Antoninus like the other Severans. He was not meant to be emperor and was very young when his mother and grand-mother plotted to put him on the throne, but he wanted to be a priest of Elagabalus, the sun god of Emesa. He went to Rome but relunctantly and became very... eccentric. He never dressed as an emperor and imposed exotic rites, such that the population of Rome became angry at him, more so than about any other, which is the reason why he was the only emperor quartered by the crowd. It's a very sad story, indeed.
The unsung hero of this quiz is undoubtedly Claudius Gothicus. How many of us fans of the hobbling stammering scholar-emperor Claudius had heard about his later namesake before taking this quiz? Not I, that's for sure (:
Actually, Gothicus was a very good emperor who sort of got the ball rolling for the empire to dig itself out of the Crisis of the Third Century. He set the stage for Aurelian to reform the empire, and for Diocletian to reform the administration.
He was so well liked that Constantine claimed Claudius Gothicus as an ancestor.
Also, I wonder how many of those who guessed Julius Nepos actually meant to write His name (as opposed to that of a certain 1st-century BC not-quite-emperor) (:
I thought you were talking about another Nepos, then I realized that Julius validates him. Well, I actually typed Nepos, but I must be one of the only ones ^^.
Oh, well, the full name of the emperors is a complex matter. That's why most are known (and studied by the historians since Suetonius) by just one of their names or cognomina, and three of them (Caligula, Caracalla and Elagabalus) are known by a popular nickname, which probably was already used during his reign.
Anyway, Caligula is one of the simplest cases, he was indeed born as Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus and just added Augustus to his list of cognomina when he became emperor.
same for Caracalla. He was another Antoninus, a caracalla was a gaulish cloak that liked to wear, sort of like Caligula and his little army boots.
But if we're gonna name emperors, Caligula and Caracalla are now pretty much the standard when referring to these guys. no need to be pedantic about it in a quick quiz!
I like these kinds of quizzes, but my main gripe, and it's not just with this one, is spelling. Some of these names are ridiculous and it would be nice to a little more forgiving.
Yeah, this bit is incorrect. The Valentinian dynasty ends with Valentinian II in 392, and then Theodosius gets the throne due to his marriage to Valentinian's sister. His two sons, Arcadius and Honorius, were his oldest sons by a previous marriage, so they had no Valentinian blood at all.
I've been listening to Mike Duncan's massive "History of Rome" podcast for the past few weeks and taking this quiz every day or two. I'm getting pretty good at naming the emperors in order now, at least up to Hadrian (which is where I am in the podcasts right now).
...and Hadrian was Caesar Traianus Hadrianus. But everyone in the English-speaking world knows him as Hadrian. Same with Constantine. It's often the case that the most well-known gain 'local' names as well as their given name.
I'm now reading Edward Gibbon's "The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" and so decided to take the quiz. I'm also combining that reading with that of Pierra Grimal's "Le siècle d’Auguste" and "La civilisation romaine". Pretty nice to understand Rome's final hours.
As a rebellion against Maximinus Thrax the african legions declared Gordian I and Gordian II emperors. The senate hailed them Augustus. A legion loyal to Thrax then killed Gordian II which led to his father comitting suicide. The senate then hailed Pupienus and Balbinus Augustus, which the people did not like so Gordian III was hailed Caesar (Junioremperor). Thrax marched on Italy and got killed by his troops. The pretorians did not like the decision that Pupienus and Balbinus became emperors so they killed them. To not get another rebellion they hailed Gordian III Augustus so they would have a popular puppet to control.
I'm pretty happy i got 82 out of 84 because of vetranio and joannes. I didn't think of the first since he was sort of self-proclaimed, and I misspelled the second three or four times.
Rome fall in 576 but the Roman empire outlived by almost a millennia.
@someone2018 For a lot of it's history, Byzantine had control over Rome itself, and later on was near it's border, if we want to use your logic. Even then, being Roman doesn't mean having Rome, otherwise why would we call it the country in Eastern Europe, Romania? Additionally, the official name of Constantinople was Nova Roma or New Rome, so for all of Byzantine's existance, it had (New) Rome.
He was so well liked that Constantine claimed Claudius Gothicus as an ancestor.
good brain exercise.
These are a bit addictive.
Yeah! But unfortunately now it only beats 90.3% of test takers...
:(
Anyway, Caligula is one of the simplest cases, he was indeed born as Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus and just added Augustus to his list of cognomina when he became emperor.
But if we're gonna name emperors, Caligula and Caracalla are now pretty much the standard when referring to these guys. no need to be pedantic about it in a quick quiz!
This beats or equals 93.2% of test takers
STILL ONLY 4 POINTS!!!
Probably the most work I've ever put into taking a single quiz. Gotta thank the quiz maker for helping to keep my memory fresh.
...almost done!
I feel like having a fairly big apple pie for very cheap money.
Mark Antony in Shakespeare was Marcus Antonius.
Etc.
The incident is called Year of the six emperors