It's mistranslated too. When we know so little about North Korea, we can assume they're in a bad state but there really isn't much information from it.
There are tigers in the mountain range in China along the border with North Korea, so it seems quite probable that there are tigers in N. Korea too, but as you say, it's difficult to prove.
the amount of tigers in Texas alone exceeds all tigers in the wild, they are much happier to breed in captivity than in the wild, unlike a certain Chinese bear.
We definitely should focus on conserving the critically endangered species much more so though
If you think Siberian Tiger populations are in bad shape, take a look at their relative in the region, the Amur Leopard. There are roughly 60 left in the wild.
So as I can see, Cambodia has been removed from the quiz. And Myanmar is unknown, surprised by that. Let's hope the 2 in Laos can meet, and they're male and female.
They are extinct in the wild in Cambodia but used to live in the wild there. Singapore is too urbanised for wild tigers, plus it’s an island (although Indonesia is a group of islands and has wild tigers).
All signs point to them not being around anymore. All the while some chinese man thinks it will make him larger downstairs, these animals have no chance of surviving.
Are you telling me that there’s no tigers in Mongolia? The photo of the Mongolian shepherd with the AK-47 and the Siberian tiger as a pet is fake then.
Florida is not a country, it is a US state and there are no wild tigers in the US. Nor are there wild ones in Australia. Only at zoos.
In Australia they have tigers at Dreamworld (an amusement park on the Gold Coast) and at several zoos nationwide. Although it is more common to find a zoo with lions or cheetahs than one with tigers.
What would be even more surprising to you is that it's the national animal of Bangladesh.
And regarding the density thing, it seems that you don't know that the country has forests and sparsely populated areas like the Sundarbans and Chittagong Hill Tract.
Yeah, like @Aficionado said, even though the country overall has a high population density, there are still a lot of natural areas. Most of the tigers in Bangladesh live in the Sundarbans, which is actually a fairly large area. There's a reason why the most famous tiger variety is called the Bengal tiger!
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/30/unicorn-lair-discovered-north-korea
We definitely should focus on conserving the critically endangered species much more so though
India's tiger population has shot up two fold since 2010 declaration.
For now...
To find poo.
them*
have*
In Australia they have tigers at Dreamworld (an amusement park on the Gold Coast) and at several zoos nationwide. Although it is more common to find a zoo with lions or cheetahs than one with tigers.
And regarding the density thing, it seems that you don't know that the country has forests and sparsely populated areas like the Sundarbans and Chittagong Hill Tract.