Thank goodness for Genocide Studies. In prepping the course, I read an early 1900s American study that dispelled the myth that Jewish people have “aquiline” noses (I think the study said that the majority of Jewish New Yorkers had “Greek profile” noses and not aquiline; it challenged the longstanding stereotype with actually evidence in any case).
In hind sight (always 20/20) I recall hearing about aqualine beaks on eagles. That's the question I missed. But all too often when I've rolled through the first 9, I whiff on 10.
Yeah as I recall, Scouts in the UK don't have the same rankings as they do in the US. Generally, it is divided into three age categories: Beavers, Cubs and Scouts.
The section for the oldest scouts in the UK used to be the Venture Scouts when I was young but I believe that has been split into Explorer and Network sections with the latter going up to age 25.
The highest "Rank" in Scouts is Chief Scout......Is the question asking for the oldest division of Scouts, in the United States? (Devil is in the detail.......)
Yes, and only 9 days ago. Just laughable. It's remarkable how laziness is rewarded here.
Anyway, who wants ten questions on the same topic? My guess is a small minority. I've been submitting gems of questions, original and interesting, but of course they are ignored like the vast majority. And instead you see a lot of basic bitch trivia so hackneyed and cliche, or just obscure in a bad way.
Yeah chill mate, it's just a bit of fun. I know it can be frustrating when your questions aren't selected, but no need to use aggressive language here.
Most users who want their questions used will submit dozens/hundreds of questions; this guy’s strategy is to yelp about it and insult the one person who runs it. Bold strategy. Let’s see if it pays off.
As the person who started this, I feel the need to say something, I completely understand QM's large workload, I was simply pointing out a mistake which can easily be made by anyone, not insulting the site's owner because he doesn't pick my questions. Sorry for igniting the flame.
You submitted 6 questions, one of which was a duplicate.
Sorry if I accidentally had a duplicate on a long-running series with several thousand questions. It will happen again, too. It's a free service.
Writing trivia is hard. One of the hardest parts is knowing what other people know. That was the thing that made your questions unusable. They were too hard. We MIGHT have one question of that difficulty level per quiz, but usually not. This isn't the world championships of trivia.
About a week ago I pointed out there was a duplicate and you said you would try and make a better effort, then boom, today an absolute shocker. Anyone too lazy to use the search function should get a 1 year ban on submitting.
My "duplicate" was actually a better rewording of something I submitted a couple of minutes earlier. No confusion there.
I often get 9 or 10 in these quizzes. That is not fun. And actually I can't remember all of the questions I submitted, but logic and process of elimination could be used for some of them.
I think it would be fun to have a harder version too. But the average score is usually around six. Given that it's a multiple choice quiz, I'd say if anything it's too hard.
To make a harder version we'd have to charge money. If we got 1000 users to pay $1/month it might be worth it. But I don't think there is demand.
As it is, I'm spending a LOT of time on this feature and the payout is very small. It's mostly a labor of love. Spending even more time is a non-starter for us.
I agree that very few people check for duplicates before submitting. But if we banned them for a year, we'd have no submitters left except maybe Dimby. And since I apparently can't even do it correctly myself...
Amazing new idea introduced! Yell at site owner to try and beg for questions while simultaneously hating their question selections! Lets see how this works out!
I like hard questions. I wouldn't mind seeing what a 3 average would be like for a while.
Might cut down on cheaters too.
I'd prefer to learn stuff, than to boast about a high score every day.
Doesn't have to be "who was the governor of Louisiana in 1924?", but general college-level questions about hard sciences, and some less-common trivia, would be refreshing. Even lower level general sciences.
I'm one of the quiz takers that gets about 6 out of 10. Average 6.6 or so after 441 quizzes and a grand total of 9 10/10s. I don't mind there being difficult questions, what you know, you know and everyone knows different trivia.
I love the themed quizzes.
I don't care if the odd question repeats, for whatever reason, it's fun to know the answer stuck (if it did 😉).
I also love reading the comments and go back to the previous day to see what was written since I did the quiz, hence this comment.
I understand people being competitive but not when it turns aggressive or insulting.
Ahh totally understandable, that was one of those questions where I definitely didn't *know* it, but when I looked at the options I asked myself "which of these seems the most outrageous?", and figured a bird eating primates would make for the best bit of trivia haha
The first question only applies to the US. It does not apply in Australia (I was a Queen's Scout which was the highest level achievable when I was young).
I didn't know about scouts but knew the highest rank of guide, when I was one, was the Queen's Guide, so was looking for Queen's (or King's Scout). Had no idea of the available choices.
And pursuant to above comments, I highly appreciate the tremendous effort that QM puts in to manage/administer JP and other contributors of quizzes, questions, development of new formats (e.g. Sudden Death), and responsible comments. As QM says, this isn't a 'Champioship'. If you don't like DTC themes or is it too easy, take another quiz, there are plenty that are harder. For example, my fishing knot quiz! Nobody has taken it, I think because it is to obscure, too 'niche'.
Just took the fishing knot quiz. If it had only been pictures I wouldn't have gotten any, but managed to guess a few thanks to the clues. Despite several years as a cub scout I've never been good with knots.
Two 10’s again today, 2nd one from a 2024 quiz not taken previously. And now I don’t think I’ll ever forget again that it was the Eagles who sang Hotel California (just never remembered that on previous quizzes).
Indeed, just checked the book again. It wasn’t explicit how, but they were lifted up and borne away. Doesn’t sound like Sam and Frodo were on the backs of the eagles.
though i would the exception proves* the rule
*old sense of the word
I guess life scout, but now I know
Anyway, who wants ten questions on the same topic? My guess is a small minority. I've been submitting gems of questions, original and interesting, but of course they are ignored like the vast majority. And instead you see a lot of basic bitch trivia so hackneyed and cliche, or just obscure in a bad way.
Sorry if I accidentally had a duplicate on a long-running series with several thousand questions. It will happen again, too. It's a free service.
Writing trivia is hard. One of the hardest parts is knowing what other people know. That was the thing that made your questions unusable. They were too hard. We MIGHT have one question of that difficulty level per quiz, but usually not. This isn't the world championships of trivia.
My "duplicate" was actually a better rewording of something I submitted a couple of minutes earlier. No confusion there.
I often get 9 or 10 in these quizzes. That is not fun. And actually I can't remember all of the questions I submitted, but logic and process of elimination could be used for some of them.
To make a harder version we'd have to charge money. If we got 1000 users to pay $1/month it might be worth it. But I don't think there is demand.
As it is, I'm spending a LOT of time on this feature and the payout is very small. It's mostly a labor of love. Spending even more time is a non-starter for us.
I agree that very few people check for duplicates before submitting. But if we banned them for a year, we'd have no submitters left except maybe Dimby. And since I apparently can't even do it correctly myself...
Might cut down on cheaters too.
I'd prefer to learn stuff, than to boast about a high score every day.
Doesn't have to be "who was the governor of Louisiana in 1924?", but general college-level questions about hard sciences, and some less-common trivia, would be refreshing. Even lower level general sciences.
I love the themed quizzes.
I don't care if the odd question repeats, for whatever reason, it's fun to know the answer stuck (if it did 😉).
I also love reading the comments and go back to the previous day to see what was written since I did the quiz, hence this comment.
I understand people being competitive but not when it turns aggressive or insulting.
I think it'd probably be easier to call out the absurd scores
Whenever I could narrow it down to a 50/50 chance, I picked the wrong one... :-(
And pursuant to above comments, I highly appreciate the tremendous effort that QM puts in to manage/administer JP and other contributors of quizzes, questions, development of new formats (e.g. Sudden Death), and responsible comments. As QM says, this isn't a 'Champioship'. If you don't like DTC themes or is it too easy, take another quiz, there are plenty that are harder. For example, my fishing knot quiz! Nobody has taken it, I think because it is to obscure, too 'niche'.
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/1701573/go-fishing-do-you-know-your-knots