More than 50% of the population of Canada lives at a lower latitude than Seattle.
428
The northernmost point on land (that we know of) was discovered in 1998. It is a small island of rock named 83-42 for its latitude.
429
For some reason, the King of the United Kingdom can drive without a driver's license. He is the only person in the UK who can legally do so.
430
There is no evidence that MSG has any negative health effects, either in the short term or long term. It also makes food delicious. Furthermore, the country where MSG was invented - Japan - uses it liberally and has the highest life expectancy of any major country in the world. So why aren't you eating MSG again?
Well who was the last king without a license? Charles had to wait till almost 74 years old to be coronated. George VI was coronated in 1865 would never have had to get a license before dying in 1936.King Edward VIII ascended in Jan and abdicated without coronation- seems likely he had driven a vehicle by age 42 in 1936 (perhaps illegally if he never was licensed- but unlikely).
George VI, Edward's younger brother was 3 days shy of 40 at the abdication (coronated 1937), even more likely to have a license prior to his becoming King- that leaves only Charles. I posit that this law has never had a single occasion where it could have any value.
The most likely case where it would have an effect would be in the case of a very young child king-and then it could be problematic indeed.
But the "fact" is wrong- it applies to the monarch not just Kings. Eliz II drove ambulance in WWII so she clearly needed a license for that. The trivia has been misstated although Eliz probably never renewed.
I'm not being so in any way, shape or form. #430 says MSG has zero unhealthy effects, eat it, it's delicious, there's zero evidence it's bad for you. MSG-laden foods are unhealthy. Processed, packaged crap loaded in sodium that leaves you desperate for liquid is terrible for your health. The Mayo Clinic is one of the cornerstones of modern health research on Earth.
So why combat misinformation with more misinformation? You could have said there was no evidence it was more unhealthy than salt, and that would have been accurate while also drawing attention to the myths.
I disagree. I know three people who can tell you whether a food has MSG in it because they start to swell up and have difficulties breathing. It is generally considered safe but anything in large amounts can cause issues. The fact that the Japanese use it in large amounts doesn't mean it is safe for everyone.
Quite a few. Most were fuel stops or drops or pickups and not beyond an airfield. I have no desire to explore a lot of those places. Outside of Europe, parts of the Middle East and North America it's rarely beyond a narrow locale or 2 in a country, if I've been beyond the airport.
The sodium content of table salt is around 39%, whereas MSG is only about 12% sodium. Because MSG can be used as a food seasoning in lieu of table salt, it is thought to be one contributor to the Japanese longevity “paradox”.
Peru cannot be 'Due South' of Cuba, as 'Due' means directly South. PS Nitpickers I usually find annoying and here I am doing just that, so, I am awarding myself a 'Golden Nitpickers' medal for May 2012.
re: The Queen and Driving Licences - UK Driving Licence are issued in her name, and so she doesn't need something to say she is allowed to drive, because she's clearly given permission to herself.
Not sure about this 'for some reason' business. HM can drive without a licence - AND travel abroad without a passport - because these documents are issued in her name.
I'm sure it would go something like the probably-not-true-but-funny story about LBJ getting pulled over in Texas after he left the White House. The trooper says, "Oh my God!" and LBJ replies "And don't you forget it, son!" before driving off.
The reason why the queen can drive without a licence is techically all driving licences are issued in her name so as she is the queen she didn't need one because she can just tell the officer that she is allowed to drive
83-42 was discovered in 2003, not 1998. Also, it's unknown if it's permanent, or if it is still above water at high tide. The northernmost undisputed, permanent land is Kaffeklubben Island, but due to rising sea levels and erosion, it probably won't be forever.
#427 makes complete sense to me, as the majority of Canadians live in southern Ontario (Toronto, Hamillton, etc.) or southern Quebec (Montreal, Quebec City, etc.)
It's not for just some random reason. Same reason why the Queen/King can travel without a passport. Legal documents in the UK are issued in the name of the monarch, so they don't need to issue one to themselves as they are the monarch.
be better with YOUR grammar, past me.
George VI, Edward's younger brother was 3 days shy of 40 at the abdication (coronated 1937), even more likely to have a license prior to his becoming King- that leaves only Charles. I posit that this law has never had a single occasion where it could have any value.
The most likely case where it would have an effect would be in the case of a very young child king-and then it could be problematic indeed.
But the "fact" is wrong- it applies to the monarch not just Kings. Eliz II drove ambulance in WWII so she clearly needed a license for that. The trivia has been misstated although Eliz probably never renewed.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/sodium/art-20045479
Guys, what are you thinking?
That is because all UK passports and UK Driving Licenses are issued in the name of the reigning monarch or sovereign, this is the reason.