Animals in British History

i dont think thats right

While some do consider gerbils to have been responsible for bringing the plague to Europe, it seems vastly unlikely that they would have been responsible for such widespread and rapid outbreaks in Britain, an island with no native gerbils.

I never realized a flea was an animal.

Agreed, it's only the Mute Swan that is considered property of the Crown -- yet mute swan is not even accepted as a type-in. (I do agree that swan should be accepted as a type-in though). Please fix this, and I suggest that the answer display as mute swan, not swan. Cheers. (For the record, I personally think swans, including mute swans, belong only to themselves.)

It's not a widley done thing, I'd never even heard of this prior to this quiz AND it does say 18th-20th so people don't really do it anymore.

Many cultures jelly fishes in their cuisines (e.g. Scandinavian, Japanese, Jewish). Live a little.

This is just crying out for a "yer mum" joke but I fear I might get banned :-|

Well ofcourse they or going to pick the weakest and most drab and pathetic animals. ( though I think most if not all are interesting in their own right. but interesting, or even awesome, does not equal cool)

I don't know... it sort of sounds nice in theory, but I suppose it means almost for a certainty that some hiker at some point is going to get killed who wouldn't have been otherwise - that's one of the main reasons why they got rid of them in the first place.

I consider this comment to be nitpicking based on your incorrect understanding of the meaning of the word "considered", even though that's objectively true as well.

Something being considered a thing doesn't preclude the factuality of that thing.

I typed minx first.. then stoat which was accepted

I typed in hermine. -_-