I worked at the National Gallery of Art in DC for $8.00/hour in the store, but I learned more art history than I think most who take undergrad classes in the subject.
I did so well with the first three rows and was feeling all proud of myself for knowing art, only to be brought low once again by the last two rows. I just kept staring at the last picture going "that one's by that Spanish guy I just know it" and guess what. It was that Spanish guy.
He actually did a painting of each day. His "Second of May" is much less known than this one though. I've got to get to the Prado some day and see them both...
Just an interesting note that there’s some discussion on whether the fountain was actually made by duchamp! It was submitted anonymously (because it was quite controversial for obvious reasons) and duchamp took credit after and began making readymades in that style, but he wrote a private letter where he said a female friend of his sent it in under a pseudonym (the chance of a woman’s submission being accepted being quite low), and his stories from later in his life on where he got the urinal don’t add up.
There’s decent circumstantial evidence for two women in the New York dada scene: the Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven and poet Louise Norton. I personally find the Baroness account the most credible: she had been producing readymade art pieces for years before the Fountain.
The wikipedia page of Fountain has a decent write up and cites the academic articles that make the case.
There’s decent circumstantial evidence for two women in the New York dada scene: the Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven and poet Louise Norton. I personally find the Baroness account the most credible: she had been producing readymade art pieces for years before the Fountain.
The wikipedia page of Fountain has a decent write up and cites the academic articles that make the case.