Only missed two. I was going to guess Sri Lanka, but then second guessed myself and didn't think it would be on here. I don't know why I didn't think to guess Syria though.
Can someone explain why Japan can have 250,000 soldiers when the 9th article of the Japanese Constitution forbids it? Also, is China such a big threat to Japan that they need so many soldiers?
As far as I understand it, their army is purely for defence and that is allowed. The military may be used in law and order, disaster response and as a form of welfare giving youth some training and discipline...
And yes, China is threatening the stability of east Asia
This has been an interesting subject to me; it is rather misleading to discount paramilitary forces. Japan for example has quite small paramilitary forces, so presumably the military takes on tasks which in other countries it might not. Italy on the other hand has military forces that are not small by European standards but also has a large paramilitary force (Carabinieri) which in the eventuality might well be deployed to a war zone in a way that another country's paramilitary would not (but then perhaps Italy's 'civilian' police forces are correspondingly smaller). Having said that, both these countries attempt to avoid doing any such thing, and sometimes it is hard to argue that they are wrong.
This quiz says it was updated January 2018 but it appears that Sudan's listed active military is still combining Sudan and South Sudan's military numbers. South Sudan has 185,000 active while Sudan only has 104,300.
Just created a similar quiz looking at the countries with the most active military troops per capita (https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/108298/countries-with-the-most-military-troops-per-capita). Makes for a much different list, though with a couple countries that cross over.
The sri lankian govt has been fightning the tamil tigers for decades. they also are close to several massive military nations with indonesia, burma, india, pakistan and iran.
Because Sri Lanka had an active war zone against the LTTE Terrorists in the northern part of the island for over 30 years, which ended in 2007. This meant that military recruitment was over the roof to account for the losses in active duty and to overpower the terrorist strongholds. To their credit it worked, and by the time the leader of the LTTE was killed in 2007 the LTTE cause was pretty much finished.
Only by the time the war was won by the government forces the military was such a juggernaut and the public propoganda was so effective that the army never stopped growing in size. Now thirteen years after the war has ended the military is still getting stronger and larger every year.
Wholeheartedly surprised that Palau isn't on this list. What happens when the strong Tuvalu military comes and attacks them. The Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands should be afraid!
Fun quiz. I had always thought DPRK was top, maybe that was percentage of population perhaps. Had to really think about some of these so was a nice challenge. Thank you.
Well, No one can easily attack Bangladesh except India,and Bangladesh can't match Indian army Even spending 100% of Their GDP.Also India is friendly toward Bangladesh. So Bangladesh Govt. is not so focused on their military.
India does most of the heavy lifting for Bangladesh. For a small background...
In the original partition of India, the Muslim majority areas (current day Pakistan and Bangladesh) were made on single country Pakistan. There was vary little in common between the Bengali partition and the rest of Pakistan and the political and military power was concentrated in current day Pakistan. By the late 60s a genocide had broken out in current Bangladesh. Bengali guerilla groups backed by India started fighting back against the Pakistani military. Pakistan fearing Indian involvement preemptively struck targets in Northern India which brought India into the conflict on East Pakistan's side. With the aid of the Indian military Pakistani forces surrendered in 1971 and Bangladesh was given it's independence. Since their independence, there has been little need for military presence due to their common relationship with India and the lack of treat from Burma (it's only other neighbor).
No European countries on here. Even if you summed up ALL of the European nations that are part of NATO, they would still be 3rd on the list. Double the population of the USA and about equal military personnel, with Russia breathing down their necks. Only 5 of these European NATO nations meet their 2% commitment on defense. Maybe it's time to get those numbers up.
Poland would now make it on. Also the source is just flat wrong for Ukraine's numbers (and it would have been in 2023), though looking about it is very hard to find confident sources on Russia's and Ukraine's wartime numbers, so it seems most sources just use their pre-war peacetime figures.
Idk, still seems weird. 15 years is plenty of time to disband, and Sudan, which has more people and is in a middle of a pretty brutal civil war, isn't even on here.
The colour coding for country quizzes like these is consistent across JetPunk. Dark blue is Europe, red is Asia, orange is North America, green is South America, purple is Africa, light blue is Oceania.
I’m not sure if there is any real meaning behind those colors, but…
My best guess is:
-blue 🔵 for the European flag
-red 🔴 for the communist party
-green 🟢 for the Amazon forest
Those I’m not so sure of:
-light blue 🔵 for the color of the sea. When I read Oceania I think about the color turquoise
-yellow/orange 🟡 for gold. Think of the gold rush in the 1800s, especially in California. But then there are many other countries where gold mining was an important aspect of history
For the last one I didn’t have any idea so I had to look it up. Best thing I found is:
-purple 🟣 symbolizes independence, prosperity, healing. But also, I learned that “The Color Purple” is a big movement in the black african community amongst women advocating against abuse, violence, rape etc.
I looked into this more and apparently all 18 year old Eritreans are conscripted into the Army indefinitely and used as forced labour for infrastructure projects, so are basically State owned slaves.
It's kinda insane how Russia, which is in the middle of a war, still has less active troops than North Korea during peacetime, despite having more than 5 times more people.
Russia though not thriving has an economy outside of food production and the military. In North Korea there is nothing besides food production and the military. Might as well put the non farmers in the military because having them loafing around without anything to do probably gets people thinking about how crappy their life and their government is and they don't want any of that.
Monaco has 121 soldiers per km2, even though they only have 255 soldiers...
And yes, China is threatening the stability of east Asia
Only by the time the war was won by the government forces the military was such a juggernaut and the public propoganda was so effective that the army never stopped growing in size. Now thirteen years after the war has ended the military is still getting stronger and larger every year.
In the thumbnail you can see a picture of
Mao Tse Tung who is former chairman of china indicating China as one of the answers most likely
In the original partition of India, the Muslim majority areas (current day Pakistan and Bangladesh) were made on single country Pakistan. There was vary little in common between the Bengali partition and the rest of Pakistan and the political and military power was concentrated in current day Pakistan. By the late 60s a genocide had broken out in current Bangladesh. Bengali guerilla groups backed by India started fighting back against the Pakistani military. Pakistan fearing Indian involvement preemptively struck targets in Northern India which brought India into the conflict on East Pakistan's side. With the aid of the Indian military Pakistani forces surrendered in 1971 and Bangladesh was given it's independence. Since their independence, there has been little need for military presence due to their common relationship with India and the lack of treat from Burma (it's only other neighbor).
My best guess is:
-blue 🔵 for the European flag
-red 🔴 for the communist party
-green 🟢 for the Amazon forest
Those I’m not so sure of:
-light blue 🔵 for the color of the sea. When I read Oceania I think about the color turquoise
-yellow/orange 🟡 for gold. Think of the gold rush in the 1800s, especially in California. But then there are many other countries where gold mining was an important aspect of history
For the last one I didn’t have any idea so I had to look it up. Best thing I found is:
-purple 🟣 symbolizes independence, prosperity, healing. But also, I learned that “The Color Purple” is a big movement in the black african community amongst women advocating against abuse, violence, rape etc.
I think I ran through every country over 20m on Africa and then I just gave up because I figured my brain wasn't working.
Interesting read, I had no idea!
dprk chooses to leave most in active