Start by naming any country that France borders. Then name any country that borders any of those countries. Then keep going until there are no more countries left to name.
The "Mandela Effect", refers to an event which didn't happen, but which a large number of people claim to remember. It was so-named because many people "remembered" the death of Nelson Mandela long before he died.
The Bible fella is spelt Methuselah i believe, and i think you need alternative spellings to be allowed on the Pharaoh such as Rameses and Ramesses. Fine quiz though...
Yeah. Everybody else on this list - with maybe the exception of Methuselah who has that whole being in the Bible thing to his credit - is well known for something other than just being really, really old.
I got this with Interesting Fact #164: The American politician John McCain was outlived by his mother. She was 106 years old at the time of his death in 2018.
Because many calendars before the Julian calendar were based on lunar months as opposed to solar years, there are those who believe that the ages of characters in The Bible were misinterpreted in translation and that Methuselah lived not for 969 solar years but for 969 lunar months (which is 78 1/2 solar years).
I'm interested as to why you think Jeanne Calment stole her mother's identity, Quizmaster. I've looked at the evidence and it isn't very compelling to me.
It's extremely compelling due to Bayesian inference.
Let's do a thought experiment. I say "think of a number between 1 and a billion". You say 376,452,125. And I say "wow, that's exactly the number I was thinking of". Which of these two scenarios is more likely?
a) We thought of the exact same number
b) The quizmaster is lying
Now realize how incredibly unlikely it is for one person to live so much longer than anyone else. The burden of proof is not on the people who point out the many flaws in Ms. Calment's story, it is on the people who claim that she lived to such an old age.
I have to agree with the Quizmaster. If we look at a list of longest-lived people, we see than Calment lived 3 years longer than 2nd place. The next biggest differenvce in consequent places is 1 year.
To which flaws are you referring, Master Quizmaster? Scientists who confirmed her age said she could remember her teachers and other small facts from her life that her daughter likely wouldn't remember. Also, the main proponent of this theory and the use of Bayesian inference is Nikolay Zak, whose findings were originally dismissed as informal. I have to think that Zak's arbitrary guess at the probability that a signature is a forgery is weak. The mathematical theory seems interesting but I think Zak's use of it looks junky and arbitrary. Some of Zak's argument is based on her having too young of muscle definition and cognition. But... maybe that's why she lived so long? The randomly guessing a number up to a billion is a bit of false equivalency, isn't it? We can't put a real statistical likelihood that she had some sort of unique telomere condition, can we? Unless we take shots in the dark at subjective probabilities. Long story short, I distrust Zak more than her!
Why is it unlikely for one person to live so much longer than everyone else? I have read that once you get past a certain age your probability of dying in any given year is about 1/2 (and it stops increasing). Not unreasonable for #1 to be about 3 years older than #2 if this is the case.
How unlikely do you actually think it is that one person could have lived that much longer than everyone else? I would estimate the probability to be around 1 in 10 (very roughly but certainly to within an order of magnitude).
I feel that this argument misrepresents both Bayesian inference and the burden of proof.
Gerontologists agree that the odds of supercentenarians making it to their next birthday drops to 1 in 2 (https://news.berkeley.edu/2018/06/28/supercentenarians/). I.e. One in two will make it to 111, 1/4 will make it to 112, 1/8 to 113, and so on. Extrapolating from this, once Calment made it to 110, her odds of making it to 122 was 1/4096. Therefore, if we’ve had 4096 supercentenarians, the odds of one of them getting to 122 become really good. The Gerontology Research Group has been able to accurately verify 1739 the existence supercentenarians (https://grg.org/Adams/A.HTM), although there would be more, since the list was last updated in 2015. Using the above information, the odds of at least one of the people on the list making it to 122 is 1739/4096, or 42.5%, a far cry from one in a billion.
In terms of the burden of proof, extensive evidence about Calment’s claims was collected during her life and thereafter, including from people who were alive to know both her and her mother. The most rigorous scientific approach was followed. Apparently, she wasn’t even very well liked, so there would have been incentive to “out” her. You also have to consider the probability of someone telling an entire village that she is now her mother, and everyone just deciding to go along with it. Given the mountains of evidence, the burden of proof now rests squarely with those who dispute her age.
Those interested in a deep dive can use this article to make up their minds: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/02/17/was-jeanne-calment-the-oldest-person-who-ever-lived-or-a-fraud
Beyond childhood, the odds of surviving the next year decrease each year.
For example, the odds I survive the next year are well over 99%. But the odds of a 100 year old surviving the next year fall a lot.
Why would this process suddenly stop at age 110? Surely if the odds of a 110 year old surviving the next year are 50%, then the odds of a 115 year old surviving are much lower.
"Technically speaking, she rules the British Commonwealth." The answer is obvious enough, but this is incorrect.
Technically speaking, she absolutely doesn't "rule" the Commonwealth. She is the figurehead (or "Head") of the Commonwealth, a purely symbolic role that has no element of "ruling". She also serves as constitutional monarch, i.e. head of state with no executive power (and not head of government), of 16 Commonwealth Realms, but not of the the other 38 Commonwealth countries.
Also technically speaking, the Commonwealth has not been described as British since the 1940s. It is more than 98% non-British, in fact, and its full name is the Commonwealth of Nations. I don't know why JetPunk insists on getting this wrong in several quizzes, when normally it makes a virtue (a fetish, some might say) of technical accuracy.
We use the vernacular because commonwealth is a generic term, and there are many different commonwealths including the Commonwealth of Virginia and the Commonwealth of Independent States.
Your point is taken that Elizabeth is not head of state of all commonwealth countries. The quiz has been amended.
And while she is "merely" a ceremonial leader you should know that her legal powers are far from ceremonial, although what exactly would happen if she exercised them is an open question.
Elizabeth famously exercised her powers in Australia in 1975. The Whitlam government was dismissed on the Governor General's advice due to them being denied supply (finance) by the Opposition
You could also have had the Queen Mother who died at the ripe old age of 101. If her daughter also has the long life gene, poor Charles might not live to be king at all.
"Statistically improbable is not the same thing as statistically impossible" - There is no evidence that Jeanne Calment's daughter assumed her identity. None whatsoever. It's a fun, yet ridiculous conspiracy theory on the same level as the Moon being made of Cheese.
accept Ramesses? also a fun fact about Attenborough for anyone who’s interested: when he goes to the BBC to record voiceovers, he does them in 6-7 hour sittings with no breaks
The quiz is titled "People Who Lived A Very Long Time," and the prompt asks, "Can you name these people, past and present..." Why is a tortoise on this quiz?
Why the great Brazilian architect Oscar Niemeyer isn’t here!? He lived 104 years old, and has many incredible projects in Brazil, and around the world. He projected Brasilia (with help of Lúcio Costa), the Contemporaneous Art Museum in Niterói, the Pampulha Architectural Ensemble, in Belo Horizonte, and he projected the headquarters of the UNO in NYC!
I can understand people doubting the age Jeanne Calment, and I think that the fact that she may or may not have stolen her mother's identity is 100% valid as a hint. But the "including me" is a little odd. It is a little presumptuous from the Quizmaster to think that his opinion has the legitimity to be added in a hint, isn't it?
Proof of the age reached by Jeanne Calment is numerous and more solid than for the vast majority of the supercentanarians we know of (cf. documents of the Gerontology Research Group GRG). Her age is scientifically documented beyond any reasonable doubt, even more so after she was accused to have usurped her mother's identity.
Nonetheless the hoax of her "stolen" age continues to live on and the fact that she indeed lived up to 122 years won't be accepted by people who only want to believe in what they call "their truth".
Let's do a thought experiment. I say "think of a number between 1 and a billion". You say 376,452,125. And I say "wow, that's exactly the number I was thinking of". Which of these two scenarios is more likely?
a) We thought of the exact same number
b) The quizmaster is lying
Now realize how incredibly unlikely it is for one person to live so much longer than anyone else. The burden of proof is not on the people who point out the many flaws in Ms. Calment's story, it is on the people who claim that she lived to such an old age.
Gerontologists agree that the odds of supercentenarians making it to their next birthday drops to 1 in 2 (https://news.berkeley.edu/2018/06/28/supercentenarians/). I.e. One in two will make it to 111, 1/4 will make it to 112, 1/8 to 113, and so on. Extrapolating from this, once Calment made it to 110, her odds of making it to 122 was 1/4096. Therefore, if we’ve had 4096 supercentenarians, the odds of one of them getting to 122 become really good. The Gerontology Research Group has been able to accurately verify 1739 the existence supercentenarians (https://grg.org/Adams/A.HTM), although there would be more, since the list was last updated in 2015. Using the above information, the odds of at least one of the people on the list making it to 122 is 1739/4096, or 42.5%, a far cry from one in a billion.
Those interested in a deep dive can use this article to make up their minds: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/02/17/was-jeanne-calment-the-oldest-person-who-ever-lived-or-a-fraud
Beyond childhood, the odds of surviving the next year decrease each year.
For example, the odds I survive the next year are well over 99%. But the odds of a 100 year old surviving the next year fall a lot.
Why would this process suddenly stop at age 110? Surely if the odds of a 110 year old surviving the next year are 50%, then the odds of a 115 year old surviving are much lower.
Technically speaking, she absolutely doesn't "rule" the Commonwealth. She is the figurehead (or "Head") of the Commonwealth, a purely symbolic role that has no element of "ruling". She also serves as constitutional monarch, i.e. head of state with no executive power (and not head of government), of 16 Commonwealth Realms, but not of the the other 38 Commonwealth countries.
Also technically speaking, the Commonwealth has not been described as British since the 1940s. It is more than 98% non-British, in fact, and its full name is the Commonwealth of Nations. I don't know why JetPunk insists on getting this wrong in several quizzes, when normally it makes a virtue (a fetish, some might say) of technical accuracy.
Your point is taken that Elizabeth is not head of state of all commonwealth countries. The quiz has been amended.
And while she is "merely" a ceremonial leader you should know that her legal powers are far from ceremonial, although what exactly would happen if she exercised them is an open question.
Also add Vera Lynn to the Quiz!
I’m surprised that Niemeyer isn’t here... really.
Lillian Gish (silent film actress) 1893-1993 - aged 99
Renee Simonot (actress and mother of Catherine Deneuve) b. 1911 and still living
Angela Landsbury (actress) b. 1925 and still living
George Schultz (Secretary of State under Reagan) b. 1920 and still living
Norman Lear (TV producer) b.1922 and still living
Kane Tanaka (world's oldest verified living person) b. 1903 and still living
Bob Barker (Price is Right) b. 1923 and still living
But one of the hints was related with a tortoise. I think that this is a mistake.
RIP Prince Philip
RIP Betty White
He has been alive since the stone age? He's currently the Presidential Counsel for President Marcos
Nonetheless the hoax of her "stolen" age continues to live on and the fact that she indeed lived up to 122 years won't be accepted by people who only want to believe in what they call "their truth".