America is pretty far down the list in the minds of whoever created this list. It's the most guessed answer however, so I think we can see who's winning in the court of public opinion :-)
Poeple who do not know much about the UAE need to educate themselves. You will be surprised how good they have it there in the UAE, esp. Dubai. Dubai is like a paradise....15 million tourist every year visit it. They are surely doing something right.
Social welfare is incredibly strong... probably to the point of being excessive there. The government is very wealthy. It's GDP per capita score is probably the thing that gives it the most points on the above criteria. There are other problems with the UAE, though, and it falls short in most of the other metrics used for the list.
Interesting...USA comes in at 16th, but then why in heck does everybody and their cousins try to get in here by hook or crook, risking their lives in many cases?
Both the Americans crying about the USA placing less than 1st, and the Europeans crying about the USA placing at all or above whatever country they happen to be from: you both look pathetic. And most of the people here commenting on the Middle East appear simply ignorant. Not going to reply to every one of you individually so this takes care of all of them...
Most of the countries are pretty obvious except for Israel. It doesn't really seem like a safe country...
And it might be a good idea to clarify that "small" country refers to population not area and maybe add the exact cutoff point. Otherwise excluding Iceland for being too small but including Singapore doesn't make any sense.
It's an extremely safe country. Beautiful. Vibrant. Full of friendly people. Well developed. Clean. Rich in history and culture. I lived there for a while. Have you ever been?
If by "most of" you're speaking purely in terms of geographic area I think I probably agree with you. If by "most you" you're talking about the urban and suburban areas where the majority of Americans are born, then I think you're probably wrong. However, I would much rather be born in Japan than in the United Arab Emirates. If this list were based on opinion and not a simple calculation then I would find this odd.
See my post above about the criteria. It's objective and based on numbers, not opinion. You've been brainwashed into hating your own country or falsely believing that the grass is greener elsewhere.
Thanks for having the courage to admit that, Geo. You've taken the first step toward recovery. Looking at the world with an open mind in an objective and properly skeptical way is an exciting thing when you do it for the first time so I envy you. Good luck!
Based on the criteria I detailed above if I had to guess I would say 1. high divorce rate 2. lower GDP per capita than many other countries on the list (using Purchasing Power Parity, due to the high cost of living in the UK) 3. higher crime rates than many Western European countries (though the difference is even more negligible than the difference between the US and those same Western European countries) 4. and they were probably docked points for climate due to all the rain.
Wikipedia should never be used as a source because it's always citing another source itself. In this case, it's citing an Economist article from 2012 making predictions about the best places to be born in 2013. The data was already kinda stale when this quiz was made in 2017. Beyond that, there was highly subjective primary research done and even the objective secondary research is rife with cultural biases. But what it does do really, really well is start conversations about these sorts of ideas and what we should be valuing, and that is important.
This quiz should be in 2 parts: 1) Which country is it best to be Born Rich in? ....... 2) Which country is it best to be Born Poor in? ........ Many so called poor countries have the richest people living the life of Gods ..... and some 'Rich countries' have plenty of poverty.
Apparently, this list (not the quiz) is limited to "best" conditions for "western-lifestyle males who happen to practice the dominant religion imposed in their country or that are so rich that religion is not an issue"
yeah... back after stalwart Republican and noted conservative Franklin Roosevelt and his famous Same Old Deal did nothing to change the country, right? Back when the highest marginal tax rate on the wealthy was 90%, just like Grover Norquist always advocates for.
Oh the 50s. When taxes were the highest ever, government spending was through the roof, the social safety net was being expanded, the GI Bill was sending thousands of young men to college, and the government was pursuing vast infrastructure projects. On the economic side of things, the 50s were a liberals dream. What we've been living in since the 80s is a conservative dream.
I think most conservatives looking back at the 50s have some Ozzie and Harriet fantasy of how things actually were. They ignore the prevailing politics and economics of the age and instead look to things like the socially conservative culture, and perhaps racial and gender inequality (though that's not most of them), as the things that made the 50s great. But mostly it's just nostalgia and rose-colored glasses.
The data is what it is. You could say the criteria is dumb (such as claiming the ideal climate is 14 C, that's pretty dumb), but there's nothing wrong with the data.
I didn't read the 'not including small countries' until after I finished and I spent like 20 seconds trying to work out how Israel made it in where as Luxembourg didn't
especially Japan should be high on all the criterias plus alpha.
UAE!! It is an absolute monarchy country, you cant be a politician, you dont have bar on the streets, no horse racing betting, and the food was the worst ever etc.
Very disputable ranking indeed. Being born in the UAE will not be a walk in the park for women for decades. Whereas even in relatively "macho" countries such as Italy, France or Spain, not only was their situation better in the first place, but it is improving significantly, thanks to a small thing called "democratic debate" and "freedom of the press". Unless it doesn't count, of course.
"Does not include small countries such as iceland" I would not call iceland a small country, it being 100.250km² !! yet singapore is included with 687km² . (And israel, taiwan, belgium, netherlands, south korea, austria, ireland, denmark, switzerland and UAE are all smaller countries)
to me it is like asking which person is taller, but excluding some people because they are poorer. Followed by something like; yea but people with more money are "bigger" because they are more important.
If you are talking about small population say small population, not the size of the country.
I would much more prefer to be born in Spain or Portugal than the UAE, since I'm gay. Wouldn't even want to visit that country before they have equal rights!
As 1/10 people are Gay - 1/10 can't live in UAE or Singapore - if 1/10 people literally cannot live somewhere it's not really a top place to live now is it?
people are really brainwashed from the media lol, im from israel and even during war its really safe and high quality of life so stop beliving everything you see on the news lol.
I think there are definitely levels to it I mean perhaps you're right now but I feel at the very least pre-2025 ceasefire agreement it was (or is) very much a two-sided war. Not that the actions of the Israeli government is overall or at all justifiable but also consider events such as October 7th, and the other unjustifiable actions of Hamas too.
I guess they mean countries with small populations. Singapore, for example, has 6 million people. They say the list doesn't include Iceland, which isn't particularly small in terms of land area. It's ranked #106 out of 195 countries on Wikipedia, larger than South Korea, Portugal, Hungary, Ireland, the UAE, and the Netherlands. However, Iceland is very small in terms of population. Its ranked #172, smaller than Malta, the Bahamas, Luxembourg, and even many medium-sized cities like Macau, Nashville, and Zurich. The entire country could fit on Staten Island. But I agree it did lead people off
This is obviously absolutely not the quizmaker's fault, but it's funny how I'd rather not be born or live in some of these countries, especially since others I consider much better are omitted. The subjectivity is staggering, even though they use quantifiable indexes to reach this conclusion.
"does not include small countries such as Iceland"
Includes South Korea, Austria, UAE, Ireland, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Taiwan, Belgium, Israel and Singapore.
Nearly the entire freaking list are countries smaller than Iceland. Only Australia, Norway, Sweden, NZ, Canada, Finland, Germany, US and Italy are bigger.
Edit apparently I made a similar comment 5 years ago, but I will leave this one up, since the caveat really should be altered.
Your previous comment probably wasn't answered because nobody in their right mind considers geographic area to have any effect at all on living conditions except in certain scenarios.
Iceland has 300,000 people. Every other country has millions. Singapore has 15 times the population of Iceland despite being significantly smaller in area.
WHOOOO HOO!
Well, it is done by an US organisation I suppose...
:')
And it might be a good idea to clarify that "small" country refers to population not area and maybe add the exact cutoff point. Otherwise excluding Iceland for being too small but including Singapore doesn't make any sense.
especially Japan should be high on all the criterias plus alpha.
UAE!! It is an absolute monarchy country, you cant be a politician, you dont have bar on the streets, no horse racing betting, and the food was the worst ever etc.
Ive lived in all 3 countries plus US of course.
to me it is like asking which person is taller, but excluding some people because they are poorer. Followed by something like; yea but people with more money are "bigger" because they are more important.
If you are talking about small population say small population, not the size of the country.
By small country they prolly meant the seychelles
The quiz is about being born in the country, not the experiences you've had while visiting.
(although it's ranking would definitely be higher if it had better gun restrictions)
Long live my Switzerland ❤️
...
Singapore
Answer Singapore
Includes South Korea, Austria, UAE, Ireland, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Taiwan, Belgium, Israel and Singapore.
Nearly the entire freaking list are countries smaller than Iceland. Only Australia, Norway, Sweden, NZ, Canada, Finland, Germany, US and Italy are bigger.
Edit apparently I made a similar comment 5 years ago, but I will leave this one up, since the caveat really should be altered.
Iceland has 300,000 people. Every other country has millions. Singapore has 15 times the population of Iceland despite being significantly smaller in area.