thumbnail

15 Important Charter Cases

Based on their significance, can you name 15 of the most important Canadian cases interpreting the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Quiz by
msc00
Rate:
Last updated: May 30, 2026
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
First submittedMay 30, 2026
Times taken0
Report this quizReport
7:00
Enter answer here
0
 / 15 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Significance
Decided
Case
Affirmed that section 8 protects an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy from state intrusion
1984
Hunter v Southam Inc
Established that section 2(a) protects religious freedom and prevents state-imposed religious observance
1985
R v Big M Drug Mart
Recognized that section 7 protects substantive principles of fundamental justice, not just procedural fairness
1985
Reference Re BC Motor Vehicle Act
Set out the test for determining when limits on Charter rights are justified under section 1
1986
R v Oakes
Recognized that state restrictions on abortion can violate a woman's security of the person under section 7
1988
R v Morgentaler
Established the framework for analyzing equality rights claims under section 15
1989
Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia
Defined freedom of expression broadly as protecting any non-violent activity that attempts to convey meaning under section 2(b)
1989
Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (Attorney General)
Confirmed that hate speech falls under freedom of expression, but can be justifiably limited under section 1
1990
R v Keegstra
Affirmed that section 7 protects the rights of accused individuals to know the case against them so that they may defend themselves, requiring broad prosecutorial disclosure
1991
R v Stinchcombe
Elucidated the principle of substantive equality as section 15 requires the government to take steps to ensure marginalized groups have equal benefit of the law
1997
Eldridge v British Columbia (Attorney General)
Held that exclusion of sexual orientation from human rights protections violates the equality guarantee under section 15
1998
Vriend v Alberta
Found that excluding same-sex couples from spousal support provisions violates section 15 equality rights
1999
M v H
Held that extradition without assurances against the death penalty generally violates section 7
2001
United States v Burns
Confirmed that extending civil marriage to same-sex couples is consistent with section 15 equality rights
2004
Reference Re Same-Sex Marriage
Recognized that criminal laws related to sex work violated section 7 by increasing risks to the safety and security of sex workers
2013
Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford
Save Your Stats
Your Next Quiz
Name all 50 states in the USA. Easy, right?
Twenty three cities have hosted the Summer Olympics at least once. Can you click them all without making any mistakes?
Click on all the people who were born in France. But three mistakes ends the quiz!
Drag the pin onto the correct country. Careful, though! Three wrong moves and the game ends.
Comments
No comments yet